what's your computer's performance?

[foy]

5.6 on new computer build

Processor - 5.9

Memory - 5.9

Graphics - 5.9

Gaming - 5.6

Hard disk - 5.9

Foy

memory went up to a 5.9 (fixed timings)

Edited November 5, 2007 by foy

[Biohead]

Got a nice cheap desktop now... 4.3

Processor - 4.9

Memory - 4.5

Graphics - 4.3

Gaming - 4.5

Hard disk - 5.9

Not bad for £194?

[deda]

3.6, thanks to ATI9600 256Mb (3.7 Graphics / 3.6 Gaming); P4 2.8Ghz (3.9); 1Gb RAM DDR 333Mhz (4.1); HD Samsung (5.3). It fits what I need.

[Hoxking]

get 3.4 in Build 5536. Then installed build 5384 and upgraded to build 5536, now only getting 3.2.

[Scotteq]

Q6600 on a DFI P35 mobo. 8/400 multis, memory 1:1, 7200.11 HDD

Edited November 4, 2007 by Scotteq

[sblabs]

[rutix]

Processor: 5.2

Memory: 5.4

Graphics:5.9

Gaming graphics: 5.9

Hard disk: 5.8

[ajb2528]

Does anyone care? As long as it runs what you want it to run does it really matter?

[ajua]

tha main goal of vista's performance index is to provide casual users with a score so they can understand how well (this is very subjective to me) that particular computer is performing.

also it was designed to provide application setups and/or programs an easy way to check for hardware requirements. but the editing of an xml file renders this feature useless.

here's my score to comply with this thread: 5.7 5.5 5.9 5.9 5.4

[ajb2528]

tha main goal of vista's performance index is to provide casual users with a score so they can understand how well (this is very subjective to me) that particular computer is performing.

also it was designed to provide application setups and/or programs an easy way to check for hardware requirements. but the editing of an xml file renders this feature useless.

here's my score to comply with this thread: 5.7 5.5 5.9 5.9 5.4

I agree that it was designed to provide application setups etc with information but do we really need people asking/telling what their particular score is? They really need to get out more...

[ajua]

we all probably need more time off...lol

[sergejk]

Hi!

Here we are ...

Edited January 27, 2008 by sergejk

[The008]

I got 3,4, thanks to my onboard video card (but mine is notebook), but I'm loving this notebook anyway!

cya!

Edited January 28, 2008 by The008

[blinkdt]

5.6 here on Vista Business x64. Good news is that I can go 45nm Quad when they become available and could always pop in a different graphics card. 5.9 is the top rating available at this time, if I understand correctly.

[Andrew932]

Not bad I suppose, better than I thought on some of them. Runs smoothley so I'm not worried.

Sais I can upgrade to 64-bit. Any idea how I would go about that?