T D Posted July 14, 2006 Share Posted July 14, 2006 I get the error that says something about not being able to access "table 221" in explorer.exe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RainyShadow Posted July 15, 2006 Share Posted July 15, 2006 I would always disable systray for the mere fact that you can access what it provides easily through the command line anyway. Only reason I run it right now is due to not knowing the command to access the 'stop hardware device' applett from the command line. Otherwise I would flat out keep it disabled.Never experienced any problems with it disabled. It would free up about 2-3% resources however being disabled.I am curious however, I_D.. what problems were you experiencing with it off?Here it is:C:\WINDOWS\RUNDLL32.EXE shell32.dll,Control_RunDLL hotplug.dllHTH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chozo4 Posted July 15, 2006 Share Posted July 15, 2006 (edited) Greatly appreciated RainyShadow. You are a savior ^^I can finally ditch systray for good and knock off a few % of consumed resources : Edited July 15, 2006 by Chozo4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eidenk Posted July 15, 2006 Share Posted July 15, 2006 I never run systray but I didn't know that one, thanks. Never had a problem unplugging hardware going "blind" though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erpdude8 Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 Minimum processor?386DX-25MHz.nope. Minimum CPU requirements for Win98fe/Win98se are Intel 486 processor 66Mhz or better with 16 megabytes of memory. making Win98 run on a 386 processor and you will regret it - BIGTIME! the CPU requirements of Win98 were printed on the Win98 product boxes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LLXX Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 Minimum processor?386DX-25MHz.nope. Minimum CPU requirements for Win98fe/Win98se are Intel 486 processor 66Mhz or better with 16 megabytes of memory. making Win98 run on a 386 processor and you will regret it - BIGTIME! the CPU requirements of Win98 were printed on the Win98 product boxes.That's what M$ says, but I've successfully run a minimal Win98se installation (nano98) on a 386DX at 25MHz with 8Mb of RAM. It was actually much less sluggish than I expected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now