tommyp Posted February 4, 2007 Posted February 4, 2007 I don't think those are the same INF files. The INF files I was talking about are the ones in the svcpack folder. These are launched via hfslip.cmd, also in svcpack. All of my hfslip###.inf files are working correctly. Open your hfslipwu.inf and see if something looks like this:[ROROE]HKLM,"SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\RunOnceEx\ZZA","200",0,"RunDll32.exe %11%\AdvPack.Dll,LaunchINFSection %10%\HFSLIP\HFSLP200.INF,DefaultInstall"...all of that was supposed to be one line
Super-Magician Posted February 4, 2007 Posted February 4, 2007 The [ROROE] section is fine. Everything is as it's supposed to be there.
Tomcat76 Posted February 4, 2007 Author Posted February 4, 2007 @TommyPI did that intentionally because I noticed that the CMD file that runs at first GUI logon (HFSLPGUI.CMD) would quit too soon if I didn't use START/WAIT for every line. I assumed that the same problem might occur with HFSLIP.CMD at T-13. Does this break installation of INF files?Another thing...The syntaxrundll32.exe setupapi.dll,InstallHinfSection DefaultInstall 128 filename.infseems to produce an error message at first GUI logon. I'm forced to do it like this:rundll32.exe advpack.dll,LaunchINFSection filename.inf,DefaultInstallShouldn't it be done like this in HFSLIP.CMD as well?
tommyp Posted February 4, 2007 Posted February 4, 2007 (edited) TC - The hfslip.cmd inf processing doesn't work in the test release, but it works fine in the latest final. In the beta, the INF doesn't process, the only thing I get is an error window (and an INF that doesn't process). I never really understood why sometimes it's setupapi and sometimes advpack. But, if it ain't broke..... Edited February 4, 2007 by tommyp
Super-Magician Posted February 5, 2007 Posted February 5, 2007 (edited) In my second test using 70203b, I've just encountered the same problem denoted above. Edited February 5, 2007 by Super-Magician
Tomcat76 Posted February 5, 2007 Author Posted February 5, 2007 Is it the same problem? I don't think TommyP uses HFSLPGUI.INF.BTW... You are the second person for whom the GUI stuff runs at T-13. I don't get it... This NEVER happened to me.I'm aware of some problems and they'll be fixed.
Super-Magician Posted February 5, 2007 Posted February 5, 2007 (edited) I'll see if 70202b creates the same problem. Edited February 5, 2007 by Super-Magician
tommyp Posted February 6, 2007 Posted February 6, 2007 Sorry, I can't test out the fix. I'm out of town for a week.
Tomcat76 Posted February 6, 2007 Author Posted February 6, 2007 (edited) @Super-Magician1) Do you have any files in HFGUIRUNONCE?2) Is HFSLPGUI.INF present in SOURCESS\I386?3) Do you see any references to HFSLPGUI.INF in SOURCESS\I386\TXTSETUP.SIF?4) Is "1200 = HFSLPGUI" defined in SOURCESS\I386\TXTSETUP.SIF?I just finished a test with a fully updated XPSP2 source including .NET1/2/3, Adobe Reader 8.0, JRE 6.0, four addons (Sidebar, FGCBA Handler, VistaUAP and VAIOXP-b2) and some dummy INF and CMD files... Works as intended... Edited February 6, 2007 by Tomcat76
Super-Magician Posted February 6, 2007 Posted February 6, 2007 (edited) (1) Yes; a previous version worked with these files.(2) Yes.(3) Yes, once.(4) Yes.Everything seems to be OK, except for that one error. When I take a look inside C:\WINDOWS\HFSLPGUI, I discover that there's only four files (see my HFSLIP.LOG file below), none of which are HFSLPGUI.INF.P.S. The driver files should not affect it in anyway because I have not changed them since my last successful run a few days ago. Edited February 6, 2007 by Super-Magician
Tomcat76 Posted February 6, 2007 Author Posted February 6, 2007 You should be seeing four files, but it should be these:HFGUI1.EXEHFGUI2.EXEHFSLPGUI.CMDHFSLPGUI.INF
daddydave Posted February 6, 2007 Posted February 6, 2007 At this point I'm more interested in comments on the "alternate input folders" feature. At the current rate of interest it won't make it into the final...Perhaps if I understood their intended purpose...
S3pHiroTh Posted February 6, 2007 Posted February 6, 2007 Hi Tomcat I've a question for you, you have written this:[not XPSP1]new HFANSWER.INI variable (INCALLSKINS=1) to include all abandoned WMP skins that still exist in the source (overrides INCWMPCSKIN=1)This means that, if I use Windows XP SP2, I should remove the old variable INCWMPCSKIN and replace it with the new INCALLSKINS? Or INCALLSKINS has an highest priority than INCWMPCSKIN?
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now