morocco31477 Posted January 4, 2006 Share Posted January 4, 2006 That list view sucks. I was able to get that view, that's considered list? #1 it's vertical not horizontal. People read from left to right, not up to down. So a natural look would be horizontal. #2 there are only two columns. No good.It doesn't "suck" it is just different. Explorer draws more columns as you stretch the window. Does it matter if we read left-to-right if we're reading columns which are top-to-bottom?I maximized the window, still only two columns. It's not as efficient so to speak as the current list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raskren Posted January 4, 2006 Share Posted January 4, 2006 (edited) I maximized the window, still only two columns. It's not as efficient so to speak as the current list.Ummm, okay? Edited January 4, 2006 by raskren Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmX.Memnoch Posted January 4, 2006 Share Posted January 4, 2006 That looks pretty darn close to the current list view myself. I personally prefer the Details view anyway so I can quickly sort by file type, date, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fizban2 Posted January 4, 2006 Share Posted January 4, 2006 details view provide almost to much information now, it can be semi overwhelming if you don't know what you are looking at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boggen Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 sadly with every OS make it dos5.0 to win3.1 to win95a,b win98, win98se, winme, winxp home/pro, winnt3.x, winnt,4.x, win2003 and now vista and longhorn on the way.vista will be winxp/2003 with all its updates with extra featers added to vista and vista will have its own set of new bugs plus some old bugs from xp / 2003. i just hope they auto include more advance features that may be found in a server os compared to a current standard home os. from secuirty to applications to feature wise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Innocent Devil Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Vista coding is supposed 2 start frm scratch (i read so somewhere)so there willbe oly new vista bugs ,no XP/2K3 :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nerwin Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 It can't wait when it comes out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suryad Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 Vista coding is supposed 2 start frm scratch (i read so somewhere)so there willbe oly new vista bugs ,no XP/2K3 :-)Incorrect. Vista is based on Win 2k3 SP1 code just like Windows XP 64 bit is. So there will be bugs but I am hoping less because they had a very solid baseline to start from. I just hope all the avalon and the presentation foundation crap they added is not full of security holes. And also just because Vista is implementing UNIX style security is not going to protect end users unles they DO use that feature. I hae seen a disturbing trend where the beta testers are turning that feature off....stupid really come to think about it. MS is getting flak for morons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fizban2 Posted January 13, 2006 Share Posted January 13, 2006 suryad is right, the code base for Vista starts with w2k3 Sp1, which is a pretty good place to start, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now