I want a program to convert CMD to EXE

[The Black Cloud]

hi 4 all

this is a good program

but not free

(emil me to send you the crack)

Download

Note :

Please change your user name

thanks

[Synapse]

(emil me to send you the crack)

READ THE RULES!

1. This is not a warez site! Links/Requests to warez and/or illegal material (porn, cracks, serials, etc..) will not be tolerated. Discussion of circumventing activation/timebombs/keygens or any other illegal activity will also not be tolerated. If you ignore any of the aforementioned you will receive a final warning. If you choose to continue, you will be banned without notice.

As for changing his username, i see nothing wrong with it... he is expressing his religion.

[RyanVM]

@The Black Cloud: OMFG, ARE YOU REALLY THAT STUPID???

[prathapml]

(emil me to send you the crack)

READ THE RULES!

Yes, please keep talk of cracks out of the forum.

[chezy666]

WTF's happening here.

[RyanVM]

WTF's happening here.     

People are continually ignoring the rules even after it's been brought up in the thread

[^_^]

well, he can talk about cracks as long as it's a** or sidewalk

but as far as .cmd to .exe, why would one need to do this?

batch files are simple and fast

[prathapml]

.cmd to .exe, why would one need to do this?

batch files are simple and fast

There are many practical reasons why you'd want to do it. But if you satisfied with your batch-files as they are, then there's no reason for you to think about converting to EXE.

One downside of .CMD to .EXE, is that you can't edit the script at will, any more (since EXE is binary now).

[The Black Cloud]

I am sorry for that

thanks

[^_^]

prathapml, that's why I use the .cmd format, because it can be edited

Since I use my unattended setup to install on customer computers, I need the flexibility of batch so I can customise the installation according to software needs of the customer.

1 question on it tho, is one method faster installation? batch vs binary?

[prathapml]

I've heard people say that its faster if you compile the batch-file into an EXE or COM. But I haven't really noticed any such thing. I think if you have a very big batch-file, then the EXE will execute faster than CMD.

[www2000]

My main goal with this ideal is to make an exe to where I can use an Autorun.inf for other programs.

After being tired of people asking me how to install their stuff *What do I click next?*

I make an silent install of it, make the cmd file to run them, make this cmd file to an exe to have it autorun once put in the CD/DVD Rom drive and BAMN... It installs the stuff, they CAN'T possibly ask me DIDDLY other than how to use it of course.

It has it's advantages unless someone knows a way or program that makes cmd file autorun

Wisc

[Radimus]

for one perfect example would be greenmachine... He is very touchy about people even looking in XPCREATE... you'd think he'd have been the first one to jump on a bat to exe compiler... assuming it is a real compiler and not a self-extractor.

[moo]

Hi to all.

I tryed bat2exe before, but it has some limitations, cmd2exe working good but I don't wanna spend my money on it, so, I ended with Inno Setup.

Works for me.

moo

[Nologic]

If one is looking to create a exe...why not just use AutoIt...simple to use and fairly powerful for whats normally being done here on these forums.