bledd Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 Ryan, it really is a nice pack to have, breathes a bit of new life into XP
fluid Posted December 16, 2004 Posted December 16, 2004 What's included in the hotfix files?I can't download the files. Other links?
fluid Posted December 16, 2004 Posted December 16, 2004 Thanks man. Does this work hand in hand with Ryan's update pack?
XPero Posted December 18, 2004 Author Posted December 18, 2004 XPize 2.5 Installer is out. First post edited. Enjoy!
keytotime Posted December 18, 2004 Posted December 18, 2004 XPero if you want to zpize the admin tools these are the files you need to modifycertmgr.dllmycomput.dllciadmin.dlldevmgr.dlldfrgres.dlldmdskres.dllels.dllfilemgmt.dllmmc.exenetplwiz.dllsysmon.ocxgpedit.dllwsecedit.dllcomsnap.dll
XPero Posted December 18, 2004 Author Posted December 18, 2004 XPero if you want to zpize the admin tools these are the files you need to modifycertmgr.dllmycomput.dllciadmin.dlldevmgr.dlldfrgres.dlldmdskres.dllels.dllfilemgmt.dllmmc.exenetplwiz.dllsysmon.ocxgpedit.dllwsecedit.dllcomsnap.dllThanks All those will be for 3.0
keytotime Posted December 18, 2004 Posted December 18, 2004 Sure, I love your packs so much the least i could do is help .Oops comsnap.dll - dosn't have any bitmaps or icons or anything editable
XPero Posted December 18, 2004 Author Posted December 18, 2004 Good news about XPize installer: you can install it silently with the /S switch.Example: "XPize v2.5.exe" /SYou could also just rename it without the space, then you wouldn't need the quotes.Example: XPize.exe /Smake sure in your unattended file though you're using start /wait EDIT: Does this mean that we can rid of "classic" XPize packs? Need some testers. Please report your experiences with this method. Thanks
kalavera Posted December 18, 2004 Posted December 18, 2004 NO! Don't get rid of classic packs ... maybe create a patcher (not installer) for the installation files, this way no more probs with versions, just change the resources of the dlls.
keytotime Posted December 18, 2004 Posted December 18, 2004 Don't get rid of the classic packs.1. Increase install time2. Increase size of cd3. Increase size of xp when installed4. Increases time needed to install xp.5. Forces use of $oem$ folders
RyanVM Posted December 19, 2004 Posted December 19, 2004 I'm inclined to agree that classic packs should remain. Direct integration is very nice and like keytotime said, it allows users to use it without necessarily having an unattended CD.
sfamonkey Posted December 19, 2004 Posted December 19, 2004 I'm inclined to agree that classic packs should remain. Direct integration is very nice and like keytotime said, it allows users to use it without necessarily having an unattended CD.there is still the orginal files There towards the end of the first post.He decide to get a installer cause people @ n e o w i n wanted to install the pack but not reinstall windows
klasa Posted December 19, 2004 Posted December 19, 2004 i think the updater needs to be an extra in the "unattended" pack, so users who don't want to use the installer can still be able to update his/her files with the updater
Recommended Posts