Jump to content

ArcticFoxie/NotHereToPlayGames -- 360Chrome v13.5.2036 rebuild 1


Recommended Posts

On 5/17/2023 at 11:07 AM, rereser said:

// ==UserScript==
// @name Inject findLastIndex Polyfill
// @version 0.0.1
// @match *://*/*
// @run-at document-start
// @grant none
// ==/UserScript==

Similar to Anbima's question: will copying the text of the quote on top of the script proposed by Articfoxie suffice to work on TM?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Is there a difference in polyfills between 13.5.2036 and 13.5.1030?
Can 2036 do more than 1030?

Which polyfills are important now?
Maybe these can be listed again in one post so that these can be easily inserted into Tampermonkey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Anbima said:

Is there a difference in polyfills between 13.5.2036 and 13.5.1030?

No.

 

6 minutes ago, Anbima said:

Can 2036 do more than 1030?

No, not really.  But the original developers of 1030 define it as "experimental" and do not recommend it for daily use.

 

6 minutes ago, Anbima said:

Which polyfills are important now?

Depends entirely on the web sites that you visit.

NONE of my weekly/daily visited web sites requre ANY of them.

But it's so extremely easy just to install them and with essentially zero impact on performance that the risk-reward is humongous to the upside, have it "ready" for that 1 out of 10,000 web sites that isn't going to work without them.

Only time will tell just how "mainstream" any of these will become.  If they become "mainstream", then that 1 out of 10,000 (purely plucked from the sky) web sites today will turn into 1 out of 100 web sites a few months from now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

No, not really.  But the original developers of 1030 define it as "experimental" and do not recommend it for daily use.

 

1030 runs much faster.
Why should this not be used?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My process count is identical when comparing 1030 with 2036.

RAM on 2036 is only 4MB more than 1030 - not worth worrying about.

I show 2036 to be slightly FASTER.

And when it comes to squeezing the turnip, every FRACTION of performance is welcomed so I run 2036.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I can do is laugh so hard that I'm crying.  Metaphorically speaking.

A little over two years ago, the "web" basically forced me to migrate from NM28 to 360Chrome because I want ONE browser to do ALL of my internet needs.

Two years ago, I could no longer pay my water bill via NM28 and 360Chrome became my ONE browser for ALL of my internet needs.

This month's water bill will not open in 360Chrome but does open in latest NM28 (but I do not own a phone and require Google Voice which does not work in NM28 or St52 or St55).

I guess I have until next month's water bill to see if I can polyfill whatever in Hades my water bill company just rolled out.

It's a vicious and unending circle!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With 2036 I have an intermittent delay when opening a web page (also when opening the settings).
I have tested it several times with the 1030 alternating with the 2036 and it is only with the 2036.

Can anyone confirm this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...