looking4awayout Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 Is it possible to replace the connection components with the one of another version? 26.5 works great if it wasn't for this issue.
roytam1 Posted February 4, 2020 Author Posted February 4, 2020 23 minutes ago, looking4awayout said: Is it possible to replace the connection components with the one of another version? 26.5 works great if it wasn't for this issue. the changes in network connections are minimal comparing with stock pm26.5.
looking4awayout Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 Would it be possible to back port those from NM27? I have the issue on three different computers, there must be a reason.
roytam1 Posted February 4, 2020 Author Posted February 4, 2020 (edited) 48 minutes ago, looking4awayout said: Would it be possible to back port those from NM27? I have the issue on three different computers, there must be a reason. there are 14 gecko versions between them, changes between them are huge Edited February 4, 2020 by roytam1 1
siria Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 looking4awayout said: > I wanted to try New Moon 26.5, to see how it would perform on such a dated laptop, > and interestingly, video performance is great: scrolling is incredibly smooth and fast, > as if I am using Internet Explorer, but it has a huge drawback that prevents me to use > such a browser on that computer: loading pages causes the browser to freeze for > around 30 seconds. If I load a page with externally hosted pictures, no hope Interesting, that reminds me of one of the killer probs with KG74 (for Win2000) on my specific 98 machine: For every link on a page it adds a 0.2sec freeze, cumulating them all, before even showing anything. NM26 and KG74 have the same engine, now wonder if that'S possibly related somehow... Did you notice any dependance on the *number of links* contained in a page? My home page is just a local link list, quite long but pure html, no frills, that demonstrates the prob clearly. (BTW another killer: can't use it anyway, since after loading any LOCAL page the browser will crash when calling 2 or more WEB pages, and vice-versa, very weird) 1
looking4awayout Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 49 minutes ago, siria said: cut It's pretty much the same problem I had with NM 26.5 on my three computers.
Sampei.Nihira Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 (edited) Pale Moon update. https://www.palemoon.org/releasenotes.shtml Quote v28.8.2.1 (2020-02-04) This is a minor release in response to YouTube deprecating their old web UI. This change will enable the new YouTube UI by default. Edited February 4, 2020 by Sampei.Nihira
NojusK Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 13 minutes ago, Sampei.Nihira said: Pale Moon update. https://www.palemoon.org/releasenotes.shtml What they did is change the User Agent for youtube.com to bump the Firefox version from 42.0 to ~60+(?) (In my Opinion, I prefer the old UI since it's less CPU intensive with my hardware and I like it too =P)
Sampei.Nihira Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 2 minutes ago, Nojus2001 said: What they did is change the User Agent for youtube.com to bump the Firefox version from 42.0 to ~60+(?) (In my Opinion, I prefer the old UI since it's less CPU intensive with my hardware and I like it too =P) Right, this change should be verified in our old OS. @roytam1 My friend, take your precautions from possible infection with Coronavirus..............
Nicholas McAnespy Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 1 hour ago, Nojus2001 said: What they did is change the User Agent for youtube.com to bump the Firefox version from 42.0 to ~60+(?) (In my Opinion, I prefer the old UI since it's less CPU intensive with my hardware and I like it too =P) Yes, the "Classic" YouTube UI is less CPU and memory intensive, but Google is going to stop supporting the "Classic" UI. FYI, New Moon 27.9 and K-Meleon 76.2 are also capable of supporting the "Polymer" YouTube interface, they just need a manual UA override. 1
roytam1 Posted February 5, 2020 Author Posted February 5, 2020 7 hours ago, Sampei.Nihira said: My friend, take your precautions from possible infection with Coronavirus.............. it is hard to get enough surgical mask here.
Sampei.Nihira Posted February 5, 2020 Posted February 5, 2020 (edited) 9 hours ago, roytam1 said: it is hard to get enough surgical mask here. Amazon? In my country, 2 Chinese tourists are hospitalized in the same hospital that isolated the virus: https://conservativeus.com/report-coronavirus-has-been-isolated-by-the-italian-researchers-in-rome/ but despite experimental therapies, their conditions have worsened, they need assisted breathing. Edited February 5, 2020 by Sampei.Nihira
roytam1 Posted February 5, 2020 Author Posted February 5, 2020 2 hours ago, Sampei.Nihira said: Amazon? because of anti mask law, amazon don't ship surgical mask to here.
Sampei.Nihira Posted February 5, 2020 Posted February 5, 2020 If you need I am available to buy them for you and send them to you. If that doesn't violate your laws and maybe you get into trouble. 3
Recommended Posts