AnX Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 If you wish to properly use Windows 2000 on any multiple core, thread, or CPU system, you must not install Update Rollup 1.This update has a bug which basically breaks proper Win2k multi-cpu support. it causes them to reach abnormally high temps. Instead, use Gurgelmeyer's USP5 and then Update Rollup 2, and then UUR or BWC ext. kernel. That's how I do it, and Win2k runs great with any multi-core setup, recognizing upto 8 cores flawlessly. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesseJH Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 That's interesting... I thought W2K could only see 2 cores/cpu's/threads 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebolt Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 I love the smell of 8 cores in the morning. Smells like...victory. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnX Posted July 25, 2015 Author Share Posted July 25, 2015 (edited) Yeah. i don't know what MS's intention was, but it certainly wasn't good. Especially considering they released this very rollup the same year the first multi core CPUs came out... Edited July 25, 2015 by AnX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebolt Posted July 25, 2015 Share Posted July 25, 2015 (edited) Windows 2000 “Update Rollup” was always such an oddity. Just what did they have in mind? Someone obviously thought the idea would go somewhere or other (Update Rollup 2?) but the concept apparently never took off. We know the rest, and what a turnaround: no more service packs for W2K Pro, not even a final Service Pack. At least there were some cumulative updates released later. They short-changed XP on service packs as well, as their longer-term strategy took shape: don’t compete with alternative operating systems, get rid of them. So far they’ve more or less cut off both support and hardware (we here being a little less “cut off” than most computer users, buyers and builders, because of what we know). Going forward (if you can call it that) the creep clearly intends to cut off installation of anything other than the Rolling Nightmare it calls Windows 10, which frankly looks to me like one long, evolving Service Pack to nowhere. I’d rather fight than switch. Edited July 25, 2015 by bluebolt 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMaguire Posted July 25, 2015 Share Posted July 25, 2015 This is interesting. I've had a lot of problems with Windows 2000 on dual core and multi-threaded systems. For a while I just assumed that it was Unofficial Update Rollup causing the problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdfox7 Posted July 27, 2015 Share Posted July 27, 2015 Windows 2000 “Update Rollup” was always such an oddity. Just what did they have in mind? Someone obviously thought the idea would go somewhere or other (Update Rollup 2?) but the concept apparently never took off. We know the rest, and what a turnaround: no more service packs for W2K Pro, not even a final Service Pack. At least there were some cumulative updates released later. They short-changed XP on service packs as well, as their longer-term strategy took shape: don’t compete with alternative operating systems, get rid of them. So far they’ve more or less cut off both support and hardware (we here being a little less “cut off” than most computer users, buyers and builders, because of what we know). Going forward (if you can call it that) the creep clearly intends to cut off installation of anything other than the Rolling Nightmare it calls Windows 10, which frankly looks to me like one long, evolving Service Pack to nowhere. I’d rather fight than switch. Microsoft has gotten progressively lazier with each NT release. Every NT operating system since 4.0 has had subsequently fewer service packs. NT 4.0 had 6, 2000 had 4, XP had 3, Vista had 2, and Windows 7 had one. Anyone who needs to install Windows 7 from Service Pack 1 to today (or in 2019) is going to have a boatload of updates to install. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomasz86 Posted July 27, 2015 Share Posted July 27, 2015 If you wish to properly use Windows 2000 on any multiple core, thread, or CPU system, you must not install Update Rollup 1. This update has a bug which basically breaks proper Win2k multi-cpu support. it causes them to reach abnormally high temps. I think this may be a solution to the problem: http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/156521-unofficial-sp-52-for-microsoft-windows-2000/?p=1103612 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phenomic Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 My 8-core works fine with Unofficial Updates Rollup and Logical CPU Limit Break, but it doesn't throttle p-state. I posted in some thread here recently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts