Lions Posted July 19, 2010 Share Posted July 19, 2010 I have a selected in the. Ini WM9I have no idea which update brings the 10.x.DLLs on the system. Do you?I think I reactivate this update for WMP9...Hmmm...Hi all,I think this is an HFSLIP (1.7.9. & 1.7.10. beta x) problem, which does not properly handle the WMP multiple updates in respect of WMP9.You can see also this post (http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/142829-missing-ieshimsdll-werdll/page__view__findpost__p__916989), referring to KB973540, but the problem (in my experience) is common to all WMP multiple updates.For now, the only way I could solve this problem was to put all WMP multiple updates in in \HFSVCPACK_SW1 folder. CiaoLions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mim0 Posted July 20, 2010 Author Share Posted July 20, 2010 (edited) I think this is an HFSLIP (1.7.9. & 1.7.10. beta x) problem, which does not properly handle the WMP multiple updates in respect of WMP9.You can see also this post (http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/142829-missing-ieshimsdll-werdll/page__view__findpost__p__916989), referring to KB973540, but the problem (in my experience) is common to all WMP multiple updates.For now, the only way I could solve this problem was to put all WMP multiple updates in in \HFSVCPACK_SW1 folder.Hi Lions,thx for the hint. After reading this thread I think the problem is not the same - all is running here. But I looked what's inside of wmfdist95.exe (what's the problematic update in your linked topic): wmasf.dll 10.0.0.3802 (and much more)But wmfdist95.exe is the reason why KB941569 is needed (I think).I will make a test...If my thought is correct, I add a dependency in the file-checker that KB941569 is expected if wmfdist95.exe was found.Otherwise I will put back KB941569 to this list in general for WMP9. Edited July 20, 2010 by Mim0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mim0 Posted July 20, 2010 Author Share Posted July 20, 2010 (edited) (...) Edited July 20, 2010 by Mim0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mim0 Posted July 20, 2010 Author Share Posted July 20, 2010 (edited) ...But wmfdist95.exe is the reason why KB941569 is needed (I think).I will make a test...If my thought is correct, I add a dependency in the file-checker that KB941569 is expected if wmfdist95.exe was found....So, I've tested the following:using the setting from Trustee with the following changes:- no WU/MU (I think it doesn't makes the difference)- DON'T using wmfdist95.exeThe result: Windows-Update doesn't expecting KB941569!So KB941569 is only needed when using WMP9+wmfdist95.exe!!!New file-checker extension for XP:2010-07-20- Fixed: Reactivated KB941569 and added a dependency: This update is needed when using the combination WMP9 + wmfdist95.exe (KB891122)- Fixed: Update-check for Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.9Thx @ all for reporting these bugs!!! Edited July 20, 2010 by Mim0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
My2GirlsDad Posted July 21, 2010 Share Posted July 21, 2010 ...But wmfdist95.exe is the reason why KB941569 is needed (I think).I will make a test...If my thought is correct, I add a dependency in the file-checker that KB941569 is expected if wmfdist95.exe was found....So, I've tested the following:using the setting from Trustee with the following changes:- no WU/MU (I think it doesn't makes the difference)- DON'T using wmfdist95.exeThe result: Windows-Update doesn't expecting KB941569!So KB941569 is only needed when using WMP9+wmfdist95.exe!!!New file-checker extension for XP:2010-07-20- Fixed: Reactivated KB941569 and added a dependency: This update is needed when using the combination WMP9 + wmfdist95.exe (KB891122)- Fixed: Update-check for Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.9Thx @ all for reporting these bugs!!! Mimo,With your new extension I'm getting KB941569 missing. I have wmp11 in the ini file. You said it only necessary for wmp9.Can you correct this or should I put it in IGNORE?Thanks for you time.M2GD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mim0 Posted July 21, 2010 Author Share Posted July 21, 2010 (edited) With your new extension I'm getting KB941569 missing. I have wmp11 in the ini file. You said it only necessary for wmp9.You're faster than me... : That's what I want to post now!Yesterday, after uploading and shutting-down the computer I noticed that I've forgotton the remark KB941569 with the hint that's it's needed only in combination with WMP9. And the file-checker is the same what you see in my list. I have also to 'mark' KB941569 in the FC with WMP9.Today I'll uploading it again.Btw... KB941569 should only be listet as missing when wmfdist95.exe was found. And if you select WMP11 and use wmfdist95.exe, wmfdist95.exe should be listet as 'wrong'.CU, Mimo--- edit ---Btw... KB941569 should only be listet as missing when wmfdist95.exe was found. And if you select WMP11 and use wmfdist95.exe, wmfdist95.exe should be listet as 'wrong'.That's another thing I've fixed! This type of dependency was not handled correctly when searching for mssing updates (it just works if existing updates are checked for wrong/obsolete). Edited July 21, 2010 by Mim0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mim0 Posted July 21, 2010 Author Share Posted July 21, 2010 (edited) new file-checker:2010-07-21- Fixed: "+"-dependencies are now working when searching for missing updates.new file-checker extension for XP:2010-07-21- Fixed: Moved KB941569 from the (general) WIN-section to WMP9 Edited July 21, 2010 by Mim0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
My2GirlsDad Posted July 22, 2010 Share Posted July 22, 2010 Thanks for the correction, Mimo! Works great now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mim0 Posted August 2, 2010 Author Share Posted August 2, 2010 New xp-update-list:2010-08-02- Added: KB2286198- Removed: KB967715 (replaced by KB2286198) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Mim0, KB967715 doesn't get replaced. It adds the following reg entry. If you delete it from the registry, KB967715 reappears on WU.[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\policies\Explorer]"HonorAutoRunSetting"=dword:00000001 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NLZ Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Mim0, could you add a check for obsolate items in the ignore list? Maybe something like this: The ignore for WindowsXP-KB967715-x86.reg is obsolete.And could it be possible to log what have been ignored? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mim0 Posted August 3, 2010 Author Share Posted August 3, 2010 Mim0, KB967715 doesn't get replaced. It adds the following reg entry. If you delete it from the registry, KB967715 reappears on WU.[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\policies\Explorer]"HonorAutoRunSetting"=dword:00000001Hi -X-, great hint! THX!!! I will update the list...Mim0, could you add a check for obsolate items in the ignore list? Maybe something like this: The ignore for WindowsXP-KB967715-x86.reg is obsolete.Hi NLZ, if I understood it right, the file-checker shall check if there are entries in the ignore-list which are unneeded, because the corresponding update is now obsolete?And could it be possible to log what have been ignored?To log missing updates which are not reported as missing because they are on the ignore-list? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NLZ Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Yes, if possible.No, I mean it lists those updates that would have been checked, but left out because the ignore. So you wouldn't miss an update unintentionally because a wrongly configured ignore list.And the link for opuc4.cab and IEAWSDC.CAB is broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mim0 Posted August 3, 2010 Author Share Posted August 3, 2010 And could it be possible to log what have been ignored?To log missing updates which are not reported as missing because they are on the ignore-list?No, I mean it lists those updates that would have been checked, but left out because the ignore. So you wouldn't miss an update unintentionally because a wrongly configured ignore list.Isn't it the same?Example: Conditions:- HF\abc.exe is expected (because it's an active update) but missing (the file abc.exe is not in HF)- The ignore-list contains abc.exe, the missing update will not be reported as missingReaction: write a log-message like that: Expected HF\abc.exe is missing, but it's no prob, because it's on the ignore-listOr do you just mean to log the complete ignore-list? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mim0 Posted August 3, 2010 Author Share Posted August 3, 2010 New update-list for XP:2010-08-03- Added: WindowsXP-KB2286198-x86.reg to add the registry-entry "HonorAutorunSetting" which is previously done by KB967715.Thx to -X- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now