Jump to content

Lowest RAM usage you've ever achieved?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello from Maine,

I was super pumped to get an XP down to 40 MB of RAM usage out of 196, but I really have nothing to compare it to. How low did you get yours ?

Thanks,

Craig


Posted

I believe some time in the past I was at around 80MB on one machine and think that's pretty good. No idea when and how I did it anymore though :)

Posted (edited)

usualy around 30-40mb with wlan drivers and sound drivers..

look at pic I uploaded ^_^

btw, I could have done alot of other things such as have 16bit graphics instead of 32bit to lowe it even more.. but I chose not to.

edit: ncm, cant upload bmp's...

Edited by godfromdfo
Posted

Around 60MB with installed MUI in virtual machine with 256MB of ram. Of course the OS is Windows XP. Probably if I disable the Bulgarian MUI I can achieve better results, but this is good enough for me

Posted

There is a similar thread in the HFSLIP section of this forum.

(or at least was, can´t find find it right now...)

Am pretty interested in this topic too, even though I´m on W2K (but XP will be on my machine soon).

btw. for arcade emu I´m using daphne, ´cause there is nothing, that beats the old classics :

dragon´s lair and space ace ;)

Agi

Posted

Drivers change memory usage a lot.

For instance, in vmware, vmware tools increase memory usage by 5 to 10MB (not the tools, only the drivers). Nvidia drivers on real install, by as much as 20MB (and probably even more now).

And so on.

19 MBs is unachievable (practically) except if you deal with RAM usage and not memory usage, i.e. you use swap.

Posted

Thank you Camarade Tux !

Do you have the actual link to the other thread ?

My bookmark seems not to be working anymore and google is (for me) not available at the moment.

Agi

Posted

Is it http://www.msfn.org/board/I-can-t-get-XP-t...AM-t116422.html ?

Btw, I've taken a look at some (now old) screenshots and in a virtual machine, having nod32, vmware tools (including the tray application) and drivers installed with driverpacks adds about 35MB of memory usage. Non-virtual machine drivers add even more (so much that if you claim a certain memory usage, you have to specify whether it is virtual machine or not).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...