Kiki Burgh

hello! just like to ask if there's a feature that would enable a hover-like function on flags displayed in member's post, especially for those whose From: entry is not visible? what i do when i see interesting/informative posts (if not check on profile) is check on flags to see the member's country of origin & check on their time-zone as i feel it'd help to post inquiries when time is most appropriate ... however, i do not know each nation's flag so i still look it up to be able to identify it correctly ... ... this is just a wishful thinking cheers!

great ... the unassociated file name is "1" can i say yes to this? thanks! can i say yes to this too? hmm ... wouldn't have found out 'twas firefox's plugin: adblock plus filter rule: block image ... it's automatically added to the filter everytime it loads the page & restricts the image from loading ... for ie though image can be seencheer!

thank you!

my apologies if presentation above was misleading (beta b as outcome). thanks for the more updated beta.

thanks -X-! yeah it does too since ver 1.0 as documented in Extras cheers!

appreciate it -X- ... i'm just not sure now if this could be processed in HF ... i recall tc used to have links to updates containing long file names ... if i have \HFSLIP\HFCABS\LegitCheckControl.cab, would it be safe to say i don't need the other 2? i just don't like it when i still get instruction to download validation plugins when downloading from ms either using ie8 or ff357 ... i've seen from your list that you recommend WGA_Validation_AddOn_1.9.40.0-2_-_redxii.7z ... cheers!

hi james! how about 3.5.7? appreciate it.

thanks Mim0! you might want to check on Article ID: 974905 - Last Review: January 13, 2010 - Revision: 2.0 another FIX for wmp came across it here, courtesy of rick cheers!

my current playlist ... alive & kicking - simple minds (jim kerr with robin clarke) woman in chains - tears for fears (roland orzabal with oleta adams, phil collins) pan within - waterboys (mike scott) dear god - midge ure (james ure) suedehead - morrissey (steven patrick morrissey) 1st picture of you - lotus eaters (peter coyle) question of lust - depeche mode (martin gore) more to lose - seona dancing (ricky gervais) matador - x'mal deutschland (anja huwe) everytime i see you - fra lippo lippi (per øystein sørensen) burning flame - vitamin z (geoff barradale) 2 rivers - adventures (terry sharpe) fire in cairo - cure (robert smith) don't dream it's over - crowded house (neil finn) love moves in strange ways - blue zoo (andy 'o') new year's day - u2 (bono) linger - cranberries (dolores o'riordan) nostalgic for more ... http://wxb102forever.com/ http://www.live365.com/stations/xb_102

hi! since there is no direct link published by ms (or is there ... for a more current 1 than this file: windowsxp-kb892130-enu-x86_72e487d115be77f49f64053893a23ecb58bc59cb.exe? ) for KB892130, does any of the following cover for it's absence in HF: \HFSLIP\HFCABS\LegitCheckControl.cab \HFSLIP\HF\WindowsXP-KB905474-ENU-x86.exe also, what would prevent validation plug-in from being asked to be installed from within firefox & ie? though i don't exactly recall if i was prompted using my latest build where i had the following: \HFSLIP\HF\WGAPluginInstall.exe \HFSLIP\HF\windowsxp-kb892130-enu-x86_72e487d115be77f49f64053893a23ecb58bc59cb.exe \HFSLIP\HF\WindowsXP-KB905474-ENU-x86.exe \HFSLIP\HFCABS\LegitCheckControl.cab it's quite annoying to go through validation esp when downloading updates from ms (if 1 has genuine os). raised related concern here thanks!

indeed running the script this time is faster ... few minor observations though ... after the run there's this file which is left parallel to the other HFSLIP dirs --- "1" (an unassociated file but may be opened by notepad) ... this file is basically similar in contents with move.txt in \HFSLIP\HFSLIPFC.MOV\ except file "1" has header like: ----------------------------------------------------------- Running HFSLIPFC Build 2010/01/16 at Sat 01/16/2010 10:10:40.89 -----------------------------------------------------------while the former doesn't just thinking, could the log be something exactly like the one in the cmd window from start: ------------------------------------------ File-Checker (Build 2010/01/16) for HFSLIP See following site for further details: people.freenet.de/MisterMoster/hfslip.htm ------------------------------------------to end: Finished Press any key to continue . . .though i know we can easily mark all, copy & paste from the dos box ... & appended w/ the findings (result of moving files) there's 1 file which probably wasn't resolved accordingly by hfslipfc as it resulted to this: Checking existing updates for wrong, obsolete or unknown: --------------------------------------------------------- unknown: HFSVCPACK_SW1\XPSEP XP and Server 2003 32 bit.msi The syntax of the command is incorrect.incidentally, this file was not moved to \HFSLIP\HFSLIPFC.MOV\ even if it was marked as unknown this next portion you can forego ... it's merely a thought ... hehehe!

hi tp! for me, there's 1 ftpsvc2.dll in C:\WINDOWS\system32 (file ver: 6.0.2600.5875 (xpsp_sp3_qfe.090904-1906)) & another in C:\WINDOWS\system32\inetsrv (file ver: 5.1.2600.5512 (xpsp.080413-0852)) ... seems Security Update for Windows XP (KB975254) concern is apparent in the last stable rel likewise ... hope this helps iron this out edit: let WU install updates just now ... including KB975254 ... left both ftpsvc2.dll in their current locations ... after restart, checked on the vers again & found out that the 1 in C:\WINDOWS\system32\inetsrv has been updated to 6.0.2600.5875 (xpsp_sp3_gdr.090904-1413) edit2: tried to remove ftpsvc2.dll from C:\WINDOWS\system32 & re-accessed WU ... no prompt to install KB975254 hi tp! did further checks in: C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\Download\ & presenting it here:...\SP2GDR is ftpsvc2.dll (file ver: 6.0.2600.3624 (xpsp_sp2_gdr.090904-1413)) ...\SP2QFE is ftpsvc2.dll (file ver: 6.0.2600.3624 (xpsp_sp2_qfe.090904-1414)) ...\SP3GDR is ftpsvc2.dll (file ver: 6.0.2600.5875 (xpsp_sp3_gdr.090904-1413)) ...\SP3QFE is ftpsvc2.dll (file ver: 6.0.2600.5875 (xpsp_sp3_qfe.090904-1906)) just wondering if adjustments would be necessary (based on feedback above) in the next rel? thanks!

hi Mim0! just wanted to report results of trying out hfslipfc_100115b ... i had the following settings: [font="Courier New"]------------------------------------------------- ! Move wrong (updates of a component which is not ! belonging to a selected component), obsolete or ! unknown updates to a new folder. ! ! MOVEWRONG: Setting for wrong updates ! MOVEOBSOLETE: Setting for obsolete updates ! MOVEUNKNOWN: Setting for unknown updates ! ! Possible values: ! 0 - Don't move the file (default) ! 1 - move the updates to "MOVETO" ! ! MOVETO the destination-folder. Default: ! HFSLIPFC.MOV ------------------------------------------------- MOVEWRONG=[color="#0000FF"]1[/color] MOVEOBSOLETE=[color="#0000FF"]1[/color] MOVEUNKNOWN=[color="#0000FF"]1[/color] MOVETO=[/font]& somewhere below: [font="Courier New"]------------------------------------------------- ! hfslip-folders to check for obsolete, wrong and ! unknown updates (not missing!). When using more ! than one folder, separate them by semicolon. ! Default: ! HF\*.*;HFGUIRUNONCE\*.*;HFCABS\*.*;HFSVCPACK_SW1\*.* ------------------------------------------------- FOLDERSET=[color="#0000FF"]HF\*.*;HFGUIRUNONCE\*.*;HFCABS\*.*;HFSVCPACK\*.*;HFSVCPACK_SW1\*.*;HFSVCPACK_SW2\*.*[/color][/font]& as result in \HFSLIP\HFSLIPFC.MOV\move.txt were these only: [font="Courier New"]unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: unknown: [/font]no other file could be found (except for move.txt)... was expecting these wrong, obsolete & unknown hotfixes be moved based on this: but were not ... was there something amiss in my settings for these to be the result? btw, please correct me if i was mistaken but running it the 2nd time (with HFSLIPFC.MOV dir retained as well as move.txt file inside (while leaving FOLDERSET= to default setting this time) only resulted to appending the current number of "unknown" items (making it twice the number of "unknown" instances in the 1st run: i.e., from what used to be 25 to 50) ... wouldn't it be better for this entire dir be deleted & recreated every run of hfslipfc? (i understand there shouldn't be a need to answer my last inquiry as this wouldn't have happened if identified files were moved to the designated directory & parsing it the 2nd time would certainly not produce the results i encountered.) just my thoughts ... cheers!

hey Mim0! i just perhaps misinterpreted this. hehehe! perhaps you are still digging deeper about the aforementioned updates. cheers!

On quick-view it seems to be true.KB960225: Schannel.dll 5.1.2600.5721 (only this) KB968389: Schannel.dll 5.1.2600.5834 (and much more) KB960803: Winhttp.dll 5.1.2600.5727 (only this) KB971737: Winhttp.dll 5.1.2600.5868 (only this) Updated list&file-checker is coming asap Mimo hi Mim0! just wanted to share results in recent run (with consideration to the ones mentioned above):[font="Courier New"]Check missing updates for Windows XP SP3: ----------------------------------------- missing (S): HF\WindowsXP-KB960225-x86-ENU.EXE (MS09-007: SChannel (Secure Chann el)) missing (S): HF\WindowsXP-KB960803-x86-ENU.EXE (MS09-013: HTTP Services)[/font]thanks!

great ... i'll check on it too. edit: it seems you considered it worthy to be added to your addons. appreciate it rado!

hi Muppet Hunter! i am sure that HFSLIP users benefit from having your list & Mim0's list out there (to add to this, i likewise check on -X-'s list) ... & since you are on the path to modifying (or improving) it, a dynamic list used to be maintained by tomcat was very user friendly (it'd be nice to have) ... the_guy too maintained his own (& tommyp & fdv) ... just kinda sad tc & the_guy ceased to maintain it ... but who's to fret when we have the current lists serve the same purpose work such as this is greatly appreciated!

hi tp! for me, there's 1 ftpsvc2.dll in C:\WINDOWS\system32 (file ver: 6.0.2600.5875 (xpsp_sp3_qfe.090904-1906)) & another in C:\WINDOWS\system32\inetsrv (file ver: 5.1.2600.5512 (xpsp.080413-0852)) ... seems Security Update for Windows XP (KB975254) concern is apparent in the last stable rel likewise ... hope this helps iron this out edit: let WU install updates just now ... including KB975254 ... left both ftpsvc2.dll in their current locations ... after restart, checked on the vers again & found out that the 1 in C:\WINDOWS\system32\inetsrv has been updated to 6.0.2600.5875 (xpsp_sp3_gdr.090904-1413) edit2: tried to remove ftpsvc2.dll from C:\WINDOWS\system32 & re-accessed WU ... no prompt to install KB975254

hi acheron, hi tp! i actually checked on this (in my last build using 1.7.9) ... tried installing IIS with FTP & WWW sub-components added & i was able to install it completely ... it's found too in HFSLP277.INF (i386) ... used WinUpdatesList by Nirsoft & it shows it as installed ... however, i accessed WU & it shows as an update needed to be installed ... hmm ...

hi strel! in this case brought up by My2GirlsDad, would there be a way for us to test the end-product so as to validate if all components have been processed accordingly other than testing it either on vm or live install (we can work with the silent installer but either all .nets must be uninstalled (or thru using .NET FX Cleanup Tool) or have not yet been installed prior to running .NET Framework setup verification tool)? have yet to make my iso so i can't confirm any findings yet. thank you!

hi! i read from -X-'s post sp3 update list: . perhaps, table could be updated over at Mimo's hfslipfc thread. cheers!

hi Mim0! hope you don't mind if i compared Table 5: Optional updates for Media Player with that of Boooggy and n7Epsilon's WMP11 Hotfix List. by this, there are 2 KBs listed that is not in table 5, namely: KB954067 & KB973442 ... just thought you might like to add these. cheers!

Hi! I'm pretty sure Kiki was reffering to mbsa(msi), when he said that he had it in HFSVCPACK_SW1... (which isn't required for WU either...)on the dot on 2 counts Martin H. i only mentioned about mbsa for more or less comparison's sake & a little additional info ... cheers!

hi Mim0! afaik, this has nothing to do with windows update for it is basically an anti-virus of sort ... mbsa 2.1 would be more likely to fit the bill as & it serves as & i have it in HFSVCPACK_SW1. cheers!

hi! you may find it HERE & save it as WindowsXP-KB968389-x86.reg ... it's in Mim0's list: table 2, cheers!