Jump to content

MagicAndre1981

Patron
  • Posts

    6,232
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    United Kingdom

Everything posted by MagicAndre1981

  1. nuhi also can't help. I've have slipstreamed Sp1 into a RTM image and next Sp2 into this Image (both offline with the same hacks) and it breaks the Image. The Servicing Stack completely comes out of order and creates a broken pending.xml which results in wrong installed packages whith the result, that a lot of required files are not present and Windows fails to boot Offline Sp2 Slipstreaming into a clean MS Sp1 ISO works fine
  2. disable the automatic reboot and make sure that your system creates the dump files when a Bugcheck occurs. Now reboot and install the following tool: http://www.resplendence.com/whocrashed and let the tool analyze the dump if you are not familiar how to do this your own and post the information you see.
  3. Hi, run vLite -unwim to unregister the WIM Filter. Now reboot and start vLIte again. Now vLite wants to reinstall the WIM driver. Maybe this helps
  4. what's your temp folder?
  5. MUI versions depend on their specific SP versions. The versions on WU are for Sp1. This is a mistake from WindowsUpdate.
  6. looks like a bad shell extension. When explorer crashes follow this guide to get it analyzed: http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=130004
  7. the emphasis is "feels" not is! You're listing to you feelings not to facts
  8. MagicAndre1981

    input string

    ImageX from WAIK 1.0 is bad. This version has bugs. If you have errors loading the fully captured image only integrate IE + Updates and install the Application the old-fashioned way with $OEM$.
  9. setup is faster because MS removed some components and moved drivers to WindowsUpdate. The faster startup is based on optimizations inside the kernel which make it able to load several services parallel not serial like in all prev Windows version and triggered start of services. This has nothing to do with the WinSxS (Backup) folder.
  10. no, nonsense. Installation is almost the same and the way how both versions handle Updates / Installation of Features is exactly the same.
  11. yes, german users also discovered this. Integrating Sp1 into a DVD with offline Hacks (vLite) causes trouble while installing Sp2.
  12. MagicAndre1981

    input string

    so ImageX from Win7 WAIK works and ImageX from WAIK 1.1 not?
  13. no, I've also used the german Vista Sp2 integrated ISO and I have no issues.
  14. MagicAndre1981

    input string

    which ImageX version did you use? The one from Win7 WAIK or WAIK 1.1?
  15. don't delete anything inside the WinSxS folder. This is the folder of the Windows Resource Protection which stores important boot files after installing updates.
  16. my Windows 7 uses 510MB commit after start but only 1,3GB of cache. So there is every time wasted unused free RAM of my 2GB. my Vista uses 560MB commit after start and 1,5GB of cache and no free wasted RAM. That's why Vista is much faster for me. Both machines use the same software (office 2007, VS 2008, svn, ff 3, tb2, firebird db server, NOD32 v3 and many more).
  17. that's why NT6.x uses the old SMB1.0 too. If you have 2 RAM modules (1 DDR2 800 and 1 DDR2 533) the fast module will run with the speed of the slower module. So this is the same. You are slowing down the possible speed to be compatible
  18. ok, post your last session.ini.
  19. network is outstanding with Vista/Win7. Do you know what SMB2 is?
  20. please post the whole error message + details and post the steps you did when this error happens.
  21. Have you disable Autorun?
  22. afaik, vLite doesn't have such an option to bypass the memory limit for SBS/EBS 2008
  23. people who disable UAC read this: http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=135143
  24. FAQ: What is the UAC? With the beginning of Windows NT MS introduced the concept of control access and creates several types of user accounts. Standard users, administrators, power users, guests and many more. All those account types have different rights. Administrators are the most powerful accounts. They can do (almost) everything and are able to write to C:\Program Files and the Windows folder. Standard users are limited accounts which can do all stuff you do when you use your pc for normal work (listen to music, browsing the www, writing emails and documents), but you are not able to change settings which effects the PC (like installing new hardware drivers, installing applications, changing the system time, running apps which require hardware access through drivers and are NOT able to write to C:\, C:\Program Folders and the windows folder). Power users are standard users but can do some operations which only administrators can do. guests have the same rights like standard users but they only have a temporary profil which is deleted at every logoff. When Windows XP came out, Ms made the decision to make all new users part of the administrator group. So you can do mostly everything on your PC. And that's why working with administrator rights is so dangerous. Malware also runs with adminrights and can do also nearly everything on your PC like the user. If you put your new created user, under XP, into the stand users group and try to do operations which requires administrator rights, you are not able to do it. It fail's with an Error 5: Access denied. So you have to use the fast user switch to logon as a member of the administrator group, change the settings you want and go back to your limited account. This is very annoying and so most of the users stay with the administrator accounts. But in 2002-2004 several virus and worms attacks happen and so many PCs with XP were infected because most people are using an account of the administrator group. Now MS realizes that running with a limited account is better. But Windows XP doesn't offer a way to combine running with limited rights and having the ability to do operations which require administrator rights. So Microsoft introduced LUA (limited User Account) in the first Beta of Vista which was renamed to UAC in the Final. With UAC turned on MS combines 2 accounts (standard users and administrator) into one. For normal work all applications are started with limited rights (shell, all launched applications). If you want to do things which require elevated rights (installing apps, deleting files where standard user don't have the rights to do it) UAC prompt is shown and you have to accept it. When you accept the UAC prompt the operation is started inside your user account but with administrator rights. Wow, this is cool! There is no need to create a second account which is part of the administrator group and use fast user switch to logon with this second account. because of this you are no as safe as you are when you are using a standard suer in XP, but you can easily run operations (writing to C:, C:\Program files, windows folder or installing new drivers) by accepting the UAC prompt. So, why do most people hate the UAC? That's because mostly 99% do not know that they are limited users. They check their useraccount inside the "groups and user" setting and still see that they are part of the administrator group. But as I already told you, that's not true. So, the UAC NEVER annoys you, it HELPS you to to operations with administrator rights very easily without having switching between 2 accounts. Try the same things with a limited user account under XP and you'll see that this is annoying. All the message boxes popping up with the message "Access denied". What did Microsoft do in Windows 7? In Windows 7 MS introduced a slider where you can adjust where you can see the UAC prompt. The default setting allows the users to change windows settings and install drivers, updates without accepting the UAC prompt. This is done by adding a small entry to the MS applications. But why is this bad? As we learned you are a standarduser when UAC is on, so this is a violation of what standard users can do. It also introduces a security risks, because malware can bypass the UAC prompt by using the build in Windows 7 applications like Leo Davidson demonstrated on his homepage ( http://www.pretentiousname.com/misc/win7_uac_whitelist2.html ). SUMMARY: With the UAC MS combines a limited account and an administrator into 1 account. You are able to do operations which allows to have administrator rights. And by running with standard user rights UAC also protects you against viruses and trojans. So the UAC nevers annoys you it helps you. The Way it was done in Windows Vista is right (but MS failed to make clear, that you are no longer administrator by default) and when you use Windows 7 always set the slider on top so that you are always prompted to accept the UAC dialog. If you are interested in understanding the UAC from the technical point, read the book "Writing secure code for Windows Vista" from Michale Howard and David LeBranc and read the Articles on Technet.
  25. next time read my sticky post: http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=127712
×
×
  • Create New...