1chaoticadult

@blinkdt 1) Add the property ISSETUPDRIVEN to the property table via the Direct Editor and give it a value of 1. 2) Add a condition to the "OnCheckSilentInstall" custom action in the InstallExecuteSequence via the Direct Editor that will always resolve to false or remove the custom action from the sequence. Credit: appdeploy.com

Thats fine. I'm just trying to stop people from posting the same thing over and over again. Later.

@Astalavista I've been doing this lately, editing WinRAR SFX for different programs I install.

Whatever. I'm tired of bickering with you back and forward. I have better things to do. You can pretty much talk to yourself for all I care. This is the end of this saga. *Moderator close this thread again*.

@Canar You are just annoyed at the fact that I can come up with argumentative remarks against anything you post based on this situation. I'm disgusted with your all of your dialog thus far. I would advise you to leave.

Stop responding then if its irrelevant. Well I'm annoyed how developers don't take advantage of an installer's unattended or silent installation ability properly without the user going through too many changes.

@Alanoll This thread is becoming hellspawn, hehe.

@Alanoll This is one of the major issues and Canar you still aren't getting it. You should admit your were wrong about this.

Canar you still have no clue what you are talking about. You bring up trivial issues (i.e. my sig, which shouldn't be a concern) to try in justify your way of handling situations. You don't know if I've participated in the foobar2000 community or not. Because this and your low post count this makes you a newbie which you provide nothing to this community. You should give respect to people such as myself you provide for the community you are just here for "news and things. About the installer again, I only said what I said to say this, a true developer trys to help another one out. You obviously don't know the meaning of sharing or the role of a community or developer for that matter. I wonder why I took this stance ummm... Let's see you just popped in this thread and said this is illegal without giving info about the Peter's stand,whose opinion matters and how its illlegal. Your opinion of me or the installer doesn't matter in my eyes because you are not the developer.

That's where you're incorrect. The major issue has to do with the redistribution of much of the AAC decoding code, which is licensed to Peter, and does not allow distribution outside of the standard foobar2000 release package. Furthermore, several third-party components were included without the express consent of the third-party devs. Those are the legal ones. However, there are more issues. First, none of the third-party component vendors whose work was used were contacted. In fact, this whole "FB2K Xtreme" project was completely unknown to the foobar2000 community. Our initial response is to request removal until the redistributor shows himself to be actually somewhat concerned about what the community thinks. 1chaoticadult has done nothing of the sort. Despite having invested effort into creating this innosetup package, he has still yet to contact Peter in any way, nor request comment from the community or anything. Although this behaviour is not illegal, it's certainly not orthodox. We've had issues with this kind of behaviour before. Second, there are several issues with the installer that were raised during a quick test/inspection of the innosetup package by myself and a group of foobar2000 component developers. Most notably, it doesn't properly install in Windows 98, has some issues with platform-level utf8api.dll selection, and so on. As it is broken, Peter asked for its removal. As he is the primary copyright holder, I'm reasonably sure he has that right. The foobar2000 community has a very low tolerance for bug-ridden software. We fight a never-ending battle against clueless developers, and do not care to be associated with them in any way. If 1chaoticadult cares to legitimize his installer, he's more than welcome to do so, and I have made it clear that if he wishes to continue distributing the package, he can contact Peter by a number of methods. As it stands, however, he's refusing to admit he might have even been in the wrong. There are proper ways to do things and improper ways to do things. 1chaoticadult or drthawhizkid or whatever his username is today did not do things the proper way. First of all I admitted I was wrong in action nothing was needed to be said. The action being I took the installer & links down. Second of all, I know it doesn't install in Windows 98 because I don't have a Win98 system to test it on and don't want to be bother with it. Most people had windows xp who downloaded my installer anyway. Third, Since you mentioned proper ways of doing things let me make a point of that. You should have pmed with the issue you and others had instead of trying to flame me in my own thread which was very rude, impolite, inappropriate for the thread and it seems you just wanted to say I stopped another what you called "clueless" developer from redistributing foobar2000 (like get brownie points or something). I even asked you to do pm me, you had no response and continued with your escapade. I like how you present yourself in being this knowing all individual when you know nothing but what you see and hear. Again you keep talking about community. If you were to bother to search I even had a poll asking about this installer before I created it, but I don't care about people's opinions right? Wrong. Its also clear that you didn't make much of an effort to check my installer deeply but did a quick test to blow it off persay. Its also funny I asked people to report bugs to me on my website and in this forum but again I don't care community right? Wrong. As I said before, if they were issues you could have informed me and I would have fixed them instead of you bashing me. If you really cared about MSFN community, which you don't seem to, then I think you would post more often at MSFN but you don't. My advice to you would be stick with the foobar2000 community because you obviously don't fit in well here. I could care less about foobar2000 now anyway . I have moved on to other things so should you.

Interesting Alanoll....

Yep the files are there. The profile sfx just doesn't work properly.

Right... I got your pms. I going to edit a newer version soon so expect an announcement about it.

@bcoste1 Do you have system restore on? You could try that reinstalling Window Media Player 10 or manually kill Windows Media Player 10 by deleting the directory and using a registry cleaner to clean out registry entries.

@a06lp If you want I could make a setup for ya.

Nevermind I think I figured it out. One of the extensions is causing problems. Nah I take that back I think its because I'm using a nightly build. Oh well I will figure it out hopefully.

@Astalavista Your method works for me sort of. I'm not using simonsays's installer (no offense) but a zip + inf (provided by prathapml) made into a sfx file. After extract that sfx and the profile sfx, firefox loads and everything visually is there but when I click buttons, etc. nothing seems to work. No tabs, windows or nothing. I was wondering does anyone know what I did wrong?

@Rico.JohnnY I heard of people having success with this, but its difficult to make an universal unpacker similar to innounp because of the different versions and different headers with each version (i.e. 2.00, 2.01, etc.) I haven't seen any version of an unpacker for it. If I find something I will post a link.

Already discussed before. Use search before you post a new topic. Previously talked about here: http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showto...uneUp+Utilities and http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showto...uneUp+Utilities and http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showto...uneUp+Utilities and http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showto...uneUp+Utilities and there a few more threads after this. The point is search should be your first choice and best friend here at MSFN.

Please use search before posting a new topic. Has been talked about before. Here: http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showto...=o&o+defrag and http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showto...=o&o+defrag.

That's true. I like AutoIt anyway.

@blinkdt There is a way to use an the msi limewire creates to silently install this. It requires editing the MSI though.

Moderator close thread....

Look Canar the link is down so the issue is solved like I said. Have you ever heard of patience?

Moderator close this thread. I'm done with this issue.