Sorry if I didnt explain myself very well. No. What I want is something that does exactly what Junxion does. Does anything like Junxion (EXCEPT Junxion), exist? The only reason I dont buy Junxion is because it is very expensive!
I think most of the people know the Junxion box. What I want is, something that does what Junxion Box does, but I dont want to pay the absurdous amount of $600. Does anyone know any kinda of product that does this? I dont think there nothing else!
Lol. @ prathapml @ Alanoll - Well, than maybe, instead of letting the users add them so Mods can delete them later, why not edit the configuration of the board to not allow the input of x carachters?
Why were the signatures deleted? If you want them to be at max 4 lines, ok, but there is no need to delete them. It would be much easyer just let the users edit them, in case they didnt, then you could delete them! This sucked ...
Guys, does anyone have any knowledge using Advanced Poll? I am having everything a weird error. MySQL Error : Connection Error Error Number: 1045 Access denied for user: 'gouki@localhost' (Using password: YES) Date : Tue, October 18, 2005 22:13:08 IP : 212.113.164.98 Browser : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716 Firefox/1.0.6 Referer : PHP Version : 4.3.11 OS : Linux Server : Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) mod_log_bytes/1.2 PHP/4.3.11 FrontPage/5.0.2.2635 mod_ssl/2.8.22 OpenSSL/0.9.7e Server Name : blog.goukisp.com Script Name : /PollFolder/admin/index.php I have the config file well configured. Any help would be apreciated!
I dont know if this should be on the Tech News. However, mods can move it to the appropriate forum. I was looking on milw0rm site, and found that a new Exploit has been found on Firefox 1.0.7. I have found some info about it: "The weakness is caused due to an error in the handling of overly large size attributes in the "Iframe" tag." I dont think that the Exploit who was submited yesterday on http://milw0rm.com/ uses the same vunerability (Iframe tag). Anyone know anything about this!?
I think he meant executing the .EXE that contains the theme files. He maybe disables the service, executes the .EXE and then starts the service and apply's the new theme that he installed. Lol. Dont ask me why, but thats what I understood!
Well, is that for Windows XP SP2? Cause I read the bulletins on the hotfixes, and dont remember seeing something like: Like I said on my previous post, 902400 replaces 873333. And only 87333 - for SP2