D.Draker

You're welcome. Why does 2016 matter, if the patch didn't change to this day? It still patches into the retardness. The links are the same. And you still patch Monkey like in the 80s, you wrote yourself.

C'mon, I kinda liked the deep, rich red colour he chose. You probably, and most likely, don't have enough sRGB on your monitor to understand and fully appreciate the colour shades.

How about that? "Get notification Blocked attempted request to: https://support.9oo91e.qjz9zk/chrome/?p=e_awsnap_rl" https://github.com/ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium/issues/104#issuecomment-256545702

"Okay, so now I can replicate one notification: Go to https://mcdonalds.fi/ Get notification Blocked attempted request to: http://www.95tat1c.qjz9zk/generate_204 This notification comes only with HTTPS connection. I'm not logged into Google, so it can be replicated in incognito mode too. This is what I see when I go to that page (due to the invalid certificate): Your connection is not private Attackers might be trying to steal your information from www.mcdonalds.fi (for example, passwords, messages, or credit cards). NET::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID Back to safety HIDE ADVANCED This server could not prove that it is www.mcdonalds.fi; its security certificate is from a248.e.akamai.net. This may be caused by a misconfiguration or an attacker intercepting your connection. Proceed to www.mcdonalds.fi (unsafe)" Link

For starters, there are rules, and in contrast to you and another member starting with "V", I have to follow them. I could care less whether it was Shift, Capslock, or your stuck finger, you didn't have to write a poem about that. Broadcasting to odd links has been known for decades, including the ungoogled Chromium fork. The question is, whether it's the case with your edits of Monkey! "Now I got a new notification: Blocked attempted request to: http://www.95tat1c.qjz9zk/generate_204 Immediately after opening https://translate.google.com. I was logged in in Google (through web). What I'm wondering is that, is this normal behaviour? Do you guys too get these notifications regularly?" https://github.com/ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium/issues/104#issuecomment-254244492

There two most likely possible scenarios.. The Seagate drive will die much faster than the any cable. Second, the sponge material will degrade over time, creating no tension.

And please stop with the CAPSLOCKING. The "super clever" developer of Ungoogled simply replaced "chromium" with "ch40m1um". Is it a 2 year old kid, or what? https://bugs.ch40m1um.qjz9zk/ I'll tell more, there are all sorts of retarded replacements all over the file, like "www.9oo9H"! Google with shmoogle, and so on. You, with your rep of 3.2K, you still wanna tell me the browser will not broadcast rubbish?

I do, and you'd better not touch the veteran wolf of the internet. With your rep of 3.2K you're supposed to be at least somewhat *tech savvy*, and know how to use WinHex, no? Well, despite your usual disrespectful talk, I do. Now use a tutorial on how to get to this. Need help? Get back to me.

With modern browsers, they are "taught" to work with odd links, so like I said, it can and will try to connect. I think, there's still a discussion can be found on how they (ISP and whatnot) spot Ungoogled chrome, it broadcasts rubbish to the net because the developer simply broke Google links, like you, but didn't clean them up.

You can't, but the browser isn't "familiar" with randomly broken links, so it still tries to go there, whereas it was coded to properly deal with the address of 0.0.0.0. Meaning - attempt nothing when it "sees" the zeroes, since it's been a standard for many decades.

Of course it does work. Fast: "0.0.0.0 is not an address of anything". Slow: "127.0.0.1 is the loopback Internet protocol (IP) address also referred to as the “localhost.” The address is used to establish an IP connection to the same machine or computer being used by the end-user." And redirection can't be faster. All because. "You can't send data to 0.0.0.0 or actively open a TCP connection to 0.0.0.0 because there is nothing there; 0.0.0.0 isn't even an unreachable or non routable address" All quotes from here: https://superuser.com/questions/949428/whats-the-difference-between-127-0-0-1-and-0-0-0-0

Please keep us updated. Best regards,

I meant insert https://0.0.0.0 into Google lytics, not home page, And home page, simply edit it out completely, the whole string with the quotes, what's stopping you?

Then listen to D'Darker's raving wisdom and replace with https://0.0.0.0

If you run several extensions, it obviously will make sense to remake them with zeroes.

Well, then sorry for the assumption, but 90's aren't around anymore, are they? And 0000 consumes nothing, it's a general recommendation since the day Vista came out.

This is what you saw how the not-so-clever russian 360chrome repackers did it, and aped it, but it's wrong and silly, the browser will still broadcast rubbish and/or try to connect to it wasting the precious CPU cycles. You need to replace e.src="https://ssl.google-analytics.com/ga.js"; with "0.0.0.0" Like they do it in the HOST file. Or with the loop "127.0.0.0", but it's SLOWER. @Sampei.Nihira, this is only for @NotHereToPlayGames, so don't read, you just don't and never appreciated advice from me.

You need to be precise with the model. The label doesn't mean it was produced by WD, For example, somewhere in 2016, WD acquired Hitachi, they are of good quality. They only produce 6TB and up, for WD. Example: WD80EZZX and WD80EFZX are labelled as US7SAJ800 equating an Ultrastar He8-8 model.

They now replaced EFRX with EFZX, it sucks 'cause it's also shingled.

Respectfully @Cixert, I know you're a good guy, but you should always listen to D.Draker. xD I literally ate tons of HDDs. Buy Enterprise grade drives, only those are still being made somewhat good. EDIT. @Karla Sleutel, EFRX is a good choice, sucks they don't produce them anymore,

@D.Draker's on vacation. Winter holidays. Nothing surprising. You have to wait.

It sounds very racist! You, yes you, without any shred of shame, discussed, and made a gazillion of topics on how to remove the telemetry from the Chinese-made Extreme Explorer 360! So, how discussing how to break/modify Tampermonkey's telemetry is any different? Oh, those famous double standards!

I once had a similar device, but had to add a very thin, flat air ventilator for the cooling, Oh, and for XP. 1) "Optimize for Quick Removal - This setting disables write caching on the disk and in Windows, so you can disconnect this device without using the Safe Removal icon" 2) "Optimize for performance - This setting enables write caching in Windows to improve disk performance. To disconnect this device from the computer, click the 'Safely Remove Hardware' icon in the taskbar notification area". https://forums.tomshardware.com/threads/hot-swapping-a-sata-drive-in-windows-2000-and-xp.1097903/

Dietmar, that device isn't locked to any specific OS, Anything starting Vista would do just fine. Bear in mind, the temps might get hot there with any HDD above 6TB, or even 4TB,

From what we all see on numerous forums/posts, Seagate is/was always in the lead of all failures, be it their build quality, firmware, poor warranty or anything else. The question is, why even bother buying them? This information is all over the internet for many decades.