Jump to content

D.Draker

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,846

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    171

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

  • Country

    France

 Content Type 

Everything posted by D.Draker

  1. D.Draker
    14 years, let me see... The end of 2008, people were buying Quads in huge quantities, smth like Q9550 was on the top of popularity list (price/performance). Such PC could still handle 360 explorer with no problems ! eMachines T3656 looks like a very underspecced PC for that era, like it was stolen from school or smth., no offence, lol.
  2. D.Draker
    It's full of bad omens. I see at least several signs of apocalypse in your dream. First, I already wrote - no lizards. Second - no birds ! Cats ate all birds ? There are more... that I will not write about. Sounds like bad omens, esp. considering they happen to you every year.
  3. D.Draker
    No, I don't have. Jakob, there's a topic dedicated to the CPL here. https://msfn.org/board/topic/184056-breakthrough-p2-new-pascal-special-microsoft-nvidia-driver-port-for-vista-x64/page/2/
  4. D.Draker
    I aready said that when mentioned why there's no lizards.
  5. D.Draker
    The list of supported devices is in the topic. EDIT: But you may try , of course.
  6. D.Draker
    From what I gather, @msfntor is a highly religious person and lives by the Bible. He doesn't celebrate Halloween, saying it's "satanical", etc. Lizards are missing from his weird dream and this could be seen as somewhat satanic and anti-bible because according to the bible all species should be present 'cause they are all God's creations. I'm not religious, I might be wrong, and I'm not good at reading dreams. I don't know why he asked me. My dreams tend to be more vivid and forecasting, I'd say. So I think it's not a miracle, it's otherwise, it's a sign of disaster - the World without lizards.
  7. D.Draker
    You mean you will do us another driver ?
  8. D.Draker
    Thanks ! But what are you gonna "try" ? I wrote except G1030 , no ?
  9. D.Draker
    Including lizards ?
  10. D.Draker
    Thanks, I'm flattered my posts encouraged you to join MSFN 1 hour ago.
  11. D.Draker
    Works on Vista with only 3 files by win32 © added to the folder, as you can see on the screenshot.
  12. D.Draker
    What does it have to do with the absence of lizards in your dream ?
  13. D.Draker
    Several days 24/7, all is fine so far on the dedicated kernel testing PC, some weirdness with chrome's explorer, no icons, look at the pic. And in local mode still can't open any explorer window, like I wrote some time ago.
  14. D.Draker
    And older (portable versions) here https://github.com/portapps/ungoogled-chromium-portable/releases Stiil , I *of course* like the MiniBrowser from this topic !
  15. D.Draker
    Indeed, I took it from here. Can't say it's 100% safe, I guess so, but I only used it for a short amunt of time. All version here, except for the latest 109 and 108. https://github.com/ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium-windows/releases
  16. D.Draker
    Hi, msfntor, of course , as you wish ! Wait, what , no lizards ?! Gotta be something wrong with the dream, all I can tell.
  17. D.Draker
    Just tried a new version of Chromium 104.0.5112.102 (Official Build, ungoogled-chromium) (64-bit) on the same Emma, only a bit above 100MB.
  18. D.Draker
    I guess it could this be the reason for NVCPL not starting, no ?
  19. D.Draker
    DAVE, it looks like it's with extensions enabled, the default should be four instances and about 600MB (approx. 150 each). Still is waaaay too much, compare to any chrome , look at my previous post or the next post.
  20. D.Draker
    MiniBrowser from this topic is based on Chromium 87.0.4280.66 and consumes only about 100mb of RAM, despite being newer than 360. Also, it has only three instances running at the same time, compared to the four of the 360 13th version ! The screengrab is from the same "Emma" PC with 8GB od RAM.
  21. D.Draker
    I use the ungoogled chrome. I should've mentioned earlier, sorry. You're totally right, no one can use the original.
  22. D.Draker
    So I started to dig deeper the 385.69 and compared with a usual Vista (non-kernel one). These all are inside of the NVCPL pack. NvUI.dll missing in SHELL32.DLL Shell_NotifyIconGetRect nvWsS.dll missing 345 (0x0159) "N/A" in COMCTL32.DLL nvxdapix.dll missing the following in USER32.DLL GetDisplayConfigBufferSizes QueryDisplayConfig DisplayConfigGetDeviceInfo SetDisplayConfig Do we have all of these in the kernel ? Thanks
  23. D.Draker
    No wonder there's almost non-existent interest in a browser that old. Current Chrome is 109.
  24. D.Draker
    I currently use Chrome v102 on my systems with 32GB RAM. I currently use Chrome un-gogoled, yes , don't laugh, I remember many of us had negativity towards it, but no choice, really. At least for now...
  25. D.Draker
    Maybe, I also have a feeling, my BIOS is watching me . Jokes aside, I can't update the default 32-bit Vista on that PC. While I absolutely can the 64-bit version. Weird, right ? The only way for me is to sign the drivers, doesn't matter whether the kernel installed or not.
×
×
  • Create New...