NotHereToPlayGames
MemberContent Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by NotHereToPlayGames
-
I do not get any popups on any of those links, if that is what you are asking. But remember, I do not allow javascript. I would have to break my own rule of not allowing javascript on a popup test site just to test to see if I get a popup. That would be what is called a self-fulfilling prophecy.
- 2,340 replies
-
If you have a legit reason for having two, that is one thing, I'm not trying to tell you how to run your own computer. Generally speaking though, it's not really a good idea to have two antivurus programs installed, two popup blockers installed, two script-blockers installed, et cetera. <off topic> Reminds me of my college days. I was not the party-type but some of my friends were. One of my friends would brag to anybody and everybody that he "double wrapped it" for "extra protection". He was the FIRST person that semester to impregnate his girlfriend - despite us all telling him that you DO NOT WEAR TWO!
- 2,340 replies
-
1
-
Why TWO extensions just to block popups? Is that an XP x86 SP2 thing? Are popups that bad on x86 SP2? I swear on all four grandparents' graves (make that five, my dad's mom passed away when I was 3 and grandpa remarried), I haven't seen a popup in over twenty years and I don't have any popup-blocker extensions and I don't even use 360Chrome's built-in setting to "disable popups". Okay, okay, TWENTY years might be a SLIGHT exaggeration. I did just track down one of my installation discs from 2004 (seventeen years ago) where my default browser was GreenBrowser coupled with Proxomitron. The author of Proxomitron passed away in 2004 and I used it long before 2004, I just can't find physical proof via installation media. GreenBrowser used to basically compete with Maxthon and Sleipnir. I went back and forth between Sleipnir and GreenBrowser as my default back then. They were basically "frontends" to Internet Explorer. It gave me TABBED BROWSING long before IE ever introduced it. The company I worked for at the time was hit with a virus that Firefox spread throughout the company network (circa 2006 to 2010, don't recall exactly). My GreenBrowser coupled with Proxomitron - my computer was the only computer in the company (200+ computers spanning 6 midwest facilities) that was NOT hit with the virus [production-level, excluding management and "big whigs").
- 2,340 replies
-
1
-
I've already found the culprit for the Web Store. Ungoogled Chromium (v88 tested in Win7 -- https://chromium.woolyss.com/ ) does the same thing, no "Add to Chrome" button! This to me is not a "side effect" but rather a PREFERENCE in much the same way that I always preferred "Ungoogled Chromium" over the "regular" version. I'll see if I can find a different way to prevent the unwanted persistent Google cookie. At the very least, I may have to go a route similar to what https://chromium.woolyss.com/ takes -- two releases, one "regular" one "ungoogled".
-
I may end up KEEPING this "side effect" in my own personal-use version, but I will return the Chrome Web Store functionality to the public-use uploaded version. I download .crx files from https://www.crx4chrome.com/, modify locally, then install locally. I never actually install directly from the Web Store. Can you please tell me the key name? HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\360chrome is created WHILE the browser is running, but should DELETE ITSELF when the browser is closed.
-
Running Windows 98 in 2020 and beyond...
NotHereToPlayGames replied to Wunderbar98's topic in Windows 9x/ME
AGREED! I don't even own a phone! NONE! No land line, no cell phone, NOTHING! A very stress-free lifestyle! In the news a week or so ago, Facebook was under fire for internal office memos being discovered where Facebook is AWARE but DOES NOT CARE that their Instagram app is the direct cause of 1 in 3 teenage girls having MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES directly tied to them spending all their time on Instagram. My only comment at the time this "news" broke - NO DUH! But not only does Facebook (owner of Instagram) NOT CARE, but NEITHER DO PARENTS. Because they FALSELY think their child's SAFETY is all tied to them having access to a PHONE. BULLCRAP! 1 in 3 teenage girls with MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES all on account of SOCIAL MEDIA. But you think this is ONLY teenage girls? Look around at the ADULTS you see "tied to their phone" - you can't tell me you don't see glimpses of MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES among those ADULTS also. Don't get me wrong, I'm not undermining the importance of taking care of folks with mental health issues - quite the opposite in fact! -
Updated links for my v11 and v12 rebuilds. Might be another day or so before I can update my v13 (I haven't visited it in a while and unsure of how many fixes/tweaks it is behind relative to v11 and v12). These fix a Google "feature" present since Chrome v69 where a Google cookie is stored in 'local storage' and does not clear on exit despite the user's preference to clear cache and cookies on exit (so no real effect for those that keep cookies from session to session). It also disables a few depracated embedded APIs (that were disabled in early v13 rebuilds but not 100% positive if they remained disabled in later v13 rebuilds after I merged my rebuild notes with some Humming Owl tweaks). A quick note - an easy way to UPGRADE and KEEP your current profile (needs performed when 360Chrome is closed) -- navigate to your CURRENT Chrome\Application directory (contains two folders and two files), DELETE the two folders and two files, COPY the two folders and two files from the below .zip into that Chrome\Application directory. When UPGRADING, you keep your existing 360Loader.ini, 360Loader.exe, and Chrome\User Data folder untouched. https://www.dropbox.com/s/v45xr0pj9g4ka7a/360ChromePortable_11.0.2031_rebuild_2.zip https://www.dropbox.com/s/aozhovtrevt4dii/360ChromePortable_12.0.1247_rebuild_6.zip
-
That popup blocker seems to cause heartache after heartache, isn't there anything better that still fits your needs? We all have different preferences, I truly understand that, I haven't seen a "popup" in over twenty years (I disable javascript and only allow it on a whitelist basis) so I don't use any popup-blocker extensions.
- 2,340 replies
-
@msfntor Keyword there is "Possible" attempt. That's not the same thing as saying "An" attempt. Personally, I'd try three or four different browsers or three or four different "canvas blockers" and see if they all agree with each other. If they do not, then it's a FALSE POSITIVE.
- 2,340 replies
-
Will try the suggestions discussed in that link over the weekend or so. Found a Google "feature" that has been present since Chrome 69 buried in 360Chrome v11, v12, and v13 that I have fixed in v12 and need to port the fixes and a few cosmetic changes since last upload all to v11 and v13. Once I upload newest v11, v12, and v13 rebuilds, I can then focus a little more on XP x86 SP2. I admit that I am quite interested in comparing my own builds to Humming Owl's builds in XP x86 SP2 - I'm not trying to "compete", just always trying to "improve".
- 2,340 replies
-
2
-
I'm getting 2160p YouTube videos without faking my User Agent in v12. So maybe that was only a v11 issue on YouTube, I don't recall offhand.
- 2,340 replies
-
Good deal. I'm going to remove the fake User Agent for my next rebuilds. People that do need them for specific needs generally know how to fake them.
- 2,340 replies
-
2
-
That is a side effect to faking a User Agent. Open the 360Loader.ini file and remove the --user-agent="Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/93.0.4577.82 Safari/537.36" (include the space before the first dash) at the end of the Parameters line. Save the file then close and restart 360Chrome. But now your YouTube will max out at 1080p max resolution so you have to decide which is more important to you.
- 2,340 replies
-
2
-
I have observed this also. But I also haven't been able to PROVE that the checkbox actually DOES anything. We have broken all IP Addresses and Telemetry that we have been able to find so the "checkbox" might say "enabled" but if you watch your DNS and TCP traffic and also your cache and cookies, it's not actually DOING anything.
- 2,340 replies
-
1
-
Already verfified that. I've tried XP x86 SP2 with default IE6 -- 360Chrome will not connect. I've tried XP x86 SP2 with IE8 updates -- 360Chrome will not connect.
- 2,340 replies