NotHereToPlayGames

There are only three "requirements" for Win11 that I am aware of. TPM, Secure Boot, and 8+ GB RAM. RUFUS removes all three. Legal and legit OS by all metrics. Just modifies the installation to install on systems not meeting all three of those "requirements". (edit: though I'm not sure why a Win11 requirements post was placed in a Win10 ESU thread, but regardless, use RUFUS to remove those ARBITRARY "requirements", be it Win10 or Win11)

Just a hunch, but you (Antonino) are very likely replying to a "spambot" (RDS).

There are some good AI-blocking lists for uBlock. Unsure if they would remove what you are encountering. Me? I haven't used them. I just use custom style sheets to hide the dumb AI content. But I also use custom style sheets to also hide YouTube "comments". So we are clearly two birds of a different feather.

Sounds like an oddly "modern" metric to gauge a web site's usability. Not for me, but yeah, "to each their own".

No firsthand experience. Supermium was never very stable on my computers. But as @jumper pointed out, I'm pretty sure that the developer already provides rebased .dll's. Haven't visited that GitHub project in a very long time so no clue where they are located. I've actually erased/deleted/permanently-moved-on from all of my XP "experiments", be they Supermium, Thorium, Pale Moon, New Moon, you name it, they ***ALL*** were nothing but "headaches". I obviously keep my own 360Chrome's around, but seldom are they ever launched. And the only Serpent that is reliable for my needs is a VERY OLD version - new updates only introduce new problems, nothing but "headaches".

Apologies again, but I'm afraid I'm not the person to ask. I ditched XP roughly a year or so ago and my life has IMPROVED a million-trillion-zillion times a million-trillion-zillion ever since! XP was holding me back !!! It's up to you to decide if all of the time spent to do things on XP is a waste of your time or not. Sorry. XP, to me, is like Linux, neat and novel, a good HOBBY, but nothing more than a HOBBY.

Apologies, but no. This rabbit hole is far too deep for me to get pulled in any further. Sorry. You will need to use Supermium and "let go" of the notion that a v86 Chrome engine can be made to do whatever you throw at it.

You're not going to like the answer. You need something like PROXOMITRON to change ":autofill" to "-webkit-autofill" for any version of Chrome older than v110 for the below javascript - But that's ony the FIRST HURDLE. Once you get past that, the error console will fill up with tons of more errors to overcome one by one. ie, once you resolve the required -webkit-autofill for Chrome versions older than v110, the paypal site then loads TWO captcha's that 360Chrome cannot pass (especially in XP). One from www.recaptcha.net and one from hcaptcha.com.

You would have to provide the web site where you are not able to register. I highly doubt that the autofill error in the console is the root cause for the inability to register.

Unsure of your real end-in-mind. If it is for your browser to autofill usernames and passwords, this is what I use -- https://www.crx4chrome.com/crx/328301/

The test also works with Chrome v126 and Supermium is now at v132. The test would have "started" working at some version between v97 and v126 - feel free to try each and every one of those versions to track it down specifically. Generally speaking, you cannot use javascript (querySelectorAll) to affect pseudo-elements (:after, :before, :checkmark, :placeholder, etc) or to affect pseudo-classes (:autofill, :active, :modal, :fullscreen, :enabled, :disabled, :nth-child, :checked, etc). You could try "::autofill" instead of ":autofill" (two colons instead of one), but I suspect that won't solve the javascript code using querySelectorAll to hunt down a pseudo-class.

Your issue is with the developer.mozilla.org "test". findLastIndex does not require a polyfill in Chrome v97 and that "test" does not work in Chrome v97. It most likely does not work in v98, v99, v100, v101... et cetera... And doesn't "start to work" until who knows where. Again, Chrome v97 wholly and fully implements findLastIndex and even v97 cannot 'pass' that "test".

Awesome! When I attempted, I could not figure out how to apply ungoogled patches. Will you also be attempting ungoogled patches?

Why does that even matter? Why interject social class into this thread? I don't understand that at all. Me personally, I could care less what poor people deal with, they should be happy with what they do have and not think they are somehow "entitled" to the things they do not have. Do "poor people" complain about the tinny sound from their "Obama Phone" and think some government-subsidized program should upgrade their Free Cheese to Dolby? All of my sound is Dolby 6.1. The equipment is capable of 7.1, but I only wired for 6.1. But come on, I'm seriously failing to see the issue with Chrome and Dolby. Carry on, no further discussion required, we've both said our side.

We had Dolby CDs also. Had laserdisc and betamax when very few of even my aunts and uncles at the time ever even heard of them. I kind of agree AND disagree. Yeah, both at the same time! One of my biggest pet peeves is folks that use their d#mn mobile phone on "speakerphone". I have a work office with a door and I have no problems whatsoever in SLAMMING THAT DOOR to make a point when lab techs are on "speakerphone". The "sound" out of those d#mn mobile phones MAKES MY EARS BLEED just thinking about it! "Chrome" is *NOT* how true audiophiles get their audio !!! It just isn't, nor is it really (in my opinion) "realistic" to think that "theater sound" should somehow emanate from a laptop speaker.