ED_Sln

I think he just didn't repackage, internet is fast, wired internet usually doesn't have traffic limits, so it doesn't matter what the file size is.

The 7z archive is also used in the official Chrome installer. And e3kskoy7wqk just extracted it from the installer, you can check, download ungoogled-chromium_135.0.7049.41.1_installer_x64.exe and extract chrome.7z from it, the hash should match. Properly you should have extracted and re-archived, but with normal compression, format is not important in principle, everyone has some archiver to open any format.

It looks like e3kskskskoy7wqk just unpacked chrome.7z from the installer, and there it is packed without compression. If I compress in 7zip (with ultra compression) the unpacked Chrome-bin folder, I got an archive size of only 101 MB for the 64 bit version of the browser.

Probably not, I've read that many people complain that it can't be turned off.

No, he hasn't updated the Vista version.

@D.Draker there is good news and bad news. The good is that the --disable-features=UserAgentClientHint flag has been returned, and the bad is that there will no longer be support for Vista and 7 without SP1. A project https://github.com/Chuyu-Team/YY-Thunks was used to return compatibility, but the author no longer wants to use it.

Created Issue.

Looks like that flag just got changed, so now it's --enable-features=RemoveClientHints In chrome://flags it's called #remove-client-hints

Maybe it's the same problem as it was with Chrome-like browsers in WinXP, when they consumed a lot of memory due to installed C++ 2015-2019. Try unzipping those dlls into the browser folder, if the memory consumption drops, then that's it. corrected_api_sets.zip

D.Draker ungoogled 134 is made for Vista, check it out.

Created an issue, asked if he could make an ungoogled version that works on Vista and 7 without SP1. And 134 is the current version, but 136 is the nightly version, so the version is higher.

del

The new build of Firefox 138 now works on Vista too, only the 32 bit version of the browser for now, and it's not guaranteed to work, but it's clear that it's moving in that direction, you just have to wait for the new ungoogled version.

Yes, he already answered that this is only possible on ungoogled versions.

Yes, when I moved the profile to another computer, the extensions disappeared. I created an issue.

How can I check if they work? I wrote these parameters in the shortcut, launched, but the browser does not write messages that some parameters are not supported, in chrome:// it also says that the browser is launched with these parameters. I checked in chrome 136 regular and for Vista, but in 7 SP1.

I just now saw, there is a build for Vista, try it, maybe it will work on 7 without SP1: https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Chromium-for-windows-7/releases/tag/136.0.7063.0

I don't know, I don't have 7 without SP1 anywhere, so I don't even have anything to test it on. But I don't think there will be anything else besides Supermium.

No, the problem is not my IP, r3dfox 128 opens all sites from Cloudflare. 115 and older ones don't pass the check. 115 sometimes, and versions below 98 always fail.

Provider's personal account, but you can't check it without a login. Cloudflare sometimes fails verification while they fix it, but they wrote about it too: https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/04/cloudflare_blocking_niche_browsers/

It's supported, but some sites don't work well in it anymore, or ask to refresh the browser. And Cloudflare doesn't work sometimes.

It does not require VxKex or other kernelex to work. Firefox https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Firefox-for-windows-7/ https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Firefox-for-windows-7/releases Chromium https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Chromium-for-windows-7 https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Chromium-for-windows-7/releases

Software will play, but for hardware acceleration, you need to have a decoder that supports NVDEC and video card was Nvidia 700 or 900 series. I checked on GTX950, LAVFilters and MPC-BE and MPC-HC, on XP x32 h265 8bit plays, but there are artifacts, apparently the driver is such, but on XP x64 h265 8bit plays without problems. Hardware acceleration h265 10 bit is not supported by NVDEC in 700 and 900 series, appeared only in 1000, but there are no drivers for it on XP.

I don't know, I haven't checked that. I'll have to check it out.

Downloaded the list of supported CPUs, you can download the Excel spreadsheet there. https://www.upload.ee/files/17540532/H110MHV3__CPU.zip.html