cluberti

Sounds like an offline files cache size configuration issue, honestly.

See if you can upload it to the FTP site I just PM'ed you.

Also note that if you've configured the queue for snmp management, then snmp must tell the spooler the error has cleared from the printer to the print server, and this rarely works. Restarting the spooler will clear it, as will unchecking the snmp box in the printer properties (to take it offline), click OK, and then re-check it to bring the printer back online.

You may also want to run process monitor while clicking setup.exe to make sure you don't have an issue with permissions (seeing access denied) or missing registry values or files (not found).

I've been trying to download this since Friday, but it's quite slow and fails frequently.

Thanks for the compliment, Andromeda43, it is appreciated. And the KB he refers to with regards to deleting the paging file when imaging is here, because I've already been PM'ed on it .

By "not work", what exactly do you mean? What errors, if any, are you getting, and what have you tried thus far to rectify the situation?

Because part of the page from google is secured with https, and part of the page is being transmitted unsecurely (via http) - I'd contact Google and see if this is something that should be happening or not, as it's basically a message telling you that you're visiting a page secured via SSL (https), but some of the page is being sent from an unencrypted (http) location.

I'd second the BartPE option, as it's likely the drive is still fine and just Windows is corrupted. You wouldn't get the splash screen if Windows couldn't find the boot sector on the C: drive and load the kernel files or registry (hint hint), so the tech just didn't try.

Photoshop, for one, requires a paging file. Also, the kernel may need it if the system gets very busy to back kernel paged pool memory and the registry. Also note that, by default, all memory I/O is backed by pages in the paging file as well unless it's I/O on a "memory-mapped" file, so disabling the paging file also increases the (albeit small, but still possible) chances that a power outage or disk failure will corrupt files. Also, you won't be able to page out pages from RAM to disk, so you'll technically not be able to run as many simultaneous applications as well, as otherwise the memory manager can "swap" pages in memory to disk for an idle app and give memory to running apps that need it. 4GB of RAM might seem like a lot, but when working with graphics and multimedia apps, it really isn't. Yes, if you can keep page file writes to a separate physical disk, this can improve performance during disk-intensive operations. By default, it's stored on the same drive as the OS (usually C:\pagefile.sys), and can be changed under the Advanced tab of System properties, under Performance > Settings button > Advanced tab > Change button. The paging file is configured in the registry, and changing it there will change the pagefile size/location after a reboot, so that is one way to change it during an unattended install - the values you'll need to modify are under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory Management, and the value you need to modify is the "PagingFiles" string value here.

Note: instructions here for reference as well The first thing to do, before doing ANYTHING else, is to download and install the "Debugging Tools for Windows" Once you've installed the tools, here are instructions on how to create a dump of explorer.exe the next time it crashes: 1. Create a directory called c:\adplus 2. Open a command prompt and change to the directory where you installed the debugging tools. By default, this is "C:\Program Files\Debugging Tools for Windows" 3. Type the following command in the command prompt: cscript adplus.vbs -crash -pn explorer.exe -quiet -o c:\adplus The next time explorer.exe crashes, it should generate a folder structure in C:\adplus, and it will contain a .dmp file there (amongst other files) - these files will tell us why explorer crashed. If it happens again and you get data, zip the C:\adplus folder up and place it somewhere we can download it, and we can help.

Sure, run the following command in a command prompt (note that the command below is all to be typed on one line): secedit /configure /cfg "%windir%\security\templates\setup security.inf" /db ss.sdb /overwrite Also note that there's already a KB on this, and a quick search here and on google came up with this KB as well. Remember to try and search before posting, as your question has already been touched on many times here and your wait time for a response would have been lower .

It's a hoax anyway.

Virtual PC 2007 doesn't support running x64 OSes as guests, it only supports x64 as the host OS.

I've seen it when you have task manager running minimized in the taskbar or the notification area, and the task manager is set to "always on top". It's wierd, but I found that after I cleared "always on top" in task manager, the problem never recurred.

Perhaps you could be a little more specific? I've not found anything I use day-to-day other than my antivirus that didn't work just fine on Vista x64.

you won't need to use the keyboard, the stop 9f should generate the memory.dmp file all on it's own. No worries there, just see if you can get that file placed somewhere once it's compressed.

You will have to call customer central and explain your issue to them, and see if you qualify.

The error code says explorer is crashing because of a bad or invalid parameter passed to it by flvsplitter.ax (that's what the c000000d status code means), but without an adplus dump of explorer.exe of it occurring we cannot tell you more.

It would help us if you told us what the "problem" is that you required sfc for in the first place?

Vista Ships with DX 10 (and DX9L for side-by-side), so I'm not sure why you'd wan't to do this.

Hmm, that's tough, and I empathize with you - getting a job later in life with less than adequate "real" experience (at least to employers) is difficult nowadays, with the market somewhat saturated with young, cheap(er) talent and outsourcing. The only real thing I can suggest is to try and get in with a very large company, or a very small one - and avoid job postings that look like buzz-word bingo for certs and experience, as they're usually just fishing to get resumes to have on file "just in case". Landing a job with a small company will mean you'll have to wow them with your professionalism and breadth of knowledge of everyday things IT, but will afford you more chances to learn and have an impact in the company's direction, which I always found quite rewarding. Going for a job with a very large company usually means that they'll hire anyone who comes to the interview in a suit, has excellent communications skills and uses appropriate grammar (both in the interview and on the resume), and shows some troubleshooting skills and basic knowledge. While you'll just be a cog in the machine, you'll have a good chance to be exposed to a wide range of technology (old and new), and you'll probably get some regular (basic) training year over year as well. I can't stress enough what it can mean to have certifications though, when your resume is thin on real-world jobs in the field. Most times I'd say certs are secondary achievements, but when you need to beef up your resume to get in the door to wow them with your personality and skills (and I'm sure you can do that ), certifications mean a vendor has (rightly or wrongly) certified you to a level of expertise commensurate with their testing methods, and you have at least a baseline of competence that an employer can rely on. This can be really key in getting that interview instead of your resume falling into the circular file, but it's always the interview itself that makes or breaks it for most companies. Good luck, and hopefully you can get some other good tips from the guys and gals here.

http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=100672

If you could, create a complete memory dump the next time it occurs, and then zip or rar it up and place it somewhere we can get to it to analyze the 9f's.

Superfetch is.... a little more than that . Check it out: http://blogs.technet.com/askperf/archive/2...readyboost.aspx