Jump to content

Mathwiz

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,827

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    50

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

  • Country

    United States

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Mathwiz

  1. Mathwiz
    Thanks for posting, @Jody Thornton. To me, the thread looked like just a straw man attack on Win XP: what happens if I turn off the firewall and connect my PC directly to the Internet without an AV program or even a router for protection? Oh, wow; bad things! Well, obviously the fault must be Win XP, not the fact that I turned off the firewall and connected my PC directly to the Internet without an AV program or even a router for protection! As for New Moon, there was just that one comment - and he seemed mostly angered by those who ask for NM support at the PM forum, despite the fact that @roytam1 and the rest of us constantly tell anyone who'll listen not to do that! Certainly not @roytam1's fault.
  2. Mathwiz
    Interesting. Unfortunately I don't see a specific answer to who owned the x.com domain, which (I assume) wasn't a big thing before Musk decided to rebrand Twitter as X (leading me to refer to the two domains collectively as Xitter.com).
  3. Mathwiz
    Off-topic: I wonder who owned x.com before Musk bought it? Surely someone did - I bet they made a bundle.
  4. Mathwiz
    Even if we got HEVC pass-thru working (on PCs with hardware HEVC decoding) it wouldn't help. You'd need the newest Widevine version to watch DRM-protected streams. No realistic chance of that happening on a browser targeting older OSes.
  5. Mathwiz
    You have to log in to view that forum. Could you summarize for those of us unwilling to do that? But even without reading the above, my theory is, Tobin trained them to hate us - how dare we presume to do anything differently than them - don't we understand they're perfect and all their decisions, including refusing to support XP/Vista, are correct? And that feeling lingers, even with Tobin out of the picture.
  6. Mathwiz
    OK, now things have gotten beyond ridiculous. Chase.com is one thing, but now I can't even open the Micro$oft Update Catalog in Serpent 55! It starts, but gets stuck in the "loading" state; never finishes (not even with a blank screen). User agent overrides appear to have no effect, although I obviously haven't tried every possibility. Thing is, I can open M$ Update Catalog even in 360EE, so it doesn't require a particularly new browser to load it. Edit: Never mind. M$ update catalog loads just fine in a clean profile. (FWIW, Chase.com works more reliably in a clean profile too, although "fill login" is still broken in Serpent. I don't even need my StructuredClone polyfill any more!) Obviously one of my add-ons or about:config tweaks is interfering. Someday I'll learn to check with a clean profile before posting an issue.
  7. Mathwiz
    You'd think if that were the problem, the forum could at least be a little bit less opaque and just say, "you can't say '<whatever>' here!" There were no swear words, so next time it happens, I'll just post a screen shot and let someone else explain to me what I said that was 403 forbidden. BTW, on my Chase.com issues, I discovered that, sometimes, it does work in Serpent, although that's rare on my home PC. I now suspect Chase has some kind of timeout, and since my home PC is slower than my work PC, the timeout rarely happens at work. (So now Chase is trying to require not only a modern browser, but also a modern-enough PC to run its Javascript-addled site quickly enough for its taste!)
  8. Mathwiz
    Something is wrong with the site - I can't seem to post more than one line without getting "403 Forbidden."
  9. Mathwiz
    I just wish Chase would quit "fixing" things that ain't broke...
  10. Mathwiz
    test
  11. Mathwiz
    Off-topic, but this is a pet peeve of mine. Why doesn't Micro$oft (or anyone else, for that matter) print huge numbers like that with commas (or periods for Europe) - or, since we don't really need to know the RAM usage right down to the byte - just abbreviate it to 2.57 GB? It's virtually impossible to quickly gauge the magnitude of a long string of digits like that - instead you have to stare at it and count digits from right to left! It's as if they've forgotten that computers were invented to do drudgery like that for us!
  12. Mathwiz
    More Annoying Chase.com Changes Chase.com is at it again, with two new annoying changes. Their first change, after only ten days (!), broke my workaround for their previous change that broke Chase.com in Serpent - https://msfn.org/board/topic/185966-my-browser-builds-part-5/?do=findComment&comment=1265370 - but oddly, only on my Win 7 home PC! It still works on Serpent on my Win 11 office PC. It's not yet clear to me what the difference is besides the OS. I'll have to try porting my Serpent profile from my office PC to my home PC and see if that fixes it. Their second change is more of an inconvenience: it broke the "Fill Login" feature - not only in Serpent, but in every browser I still use - Edge 109, Firefox 115, and Serpent at work. The site itself has a "remember me" feature for the user ID, but now I have to type my password every time I log in. Edit: Well, I take that back: Edge just signed me in automatically. A bit slow but it worked. OTOH, Mo 115 is now completely broken. I have a suspicion that Chase is making changes as complaints roll in. I probably need to wait until things settle down.
  13. Mathwiz
    +1 for the recommendation. What's the advantage of 1.4.3 over newer versions?
  14. Mathwiz
    Well, we knew he was unpredictable. I know he had a strong objection to having to register his app with all the major email services just to use OAuth2, which they pretty much all require now (and was also the reason I started this thread). I don't know if that factored into his decision though.
  15. Mathwiz
    Dragging myself back on topic, I discovered a workaround for chase.com on Serpent. At least it works on 55; haven't tried 52 yet but it'll probably work there too, at least as long as you use my StructuredClone polyfill via ???Monkey. When you first log on, you get the dreaded: But if you click "Plan & track," then click back to "Accounts," it will come up and work fine! Well, mostly fine; if you have multiple accounts, the "Transfer money" option is broken. You can't select the other account to transfer money to. Have to use a more modern browser for that function to work. But at least it's usable outside of that function.
  16. Mathwiz
    Maybe so; but I don't see much point in running either Supermium (especially when you can have Ungoogled Chromium instead) or r3dfox on Win 10 or 11. The main reason these forks exist is so you can run them on older Windows versions! I could sort of imagine doing this at the installer level - the installer picks Win 10-optimized dll's if you're installing on Win 10, Win 7-optimized dll's for Win 7, etc. The installer might be a bit bloated, but once you're done installing, you can delete it and not waste space on a bunch of code that's dead on all but one OS. But you'd still need to give Win 10/11 users a reason to pick your browser over vanilla Cr/Mo. That's not as scary as it looks. It's intended for mobile devices (laptops, tablets, phones) that may need to connect to public WiFi services. When you start the browser, it silently connects to a test page at Mozilla. If it gets what it expects, it knows it has Internet connectivity; otherwise, it knows it's on a "captive portal" that the user needs to sign on to before using, and presents the page it got - typically the WiFi service's sign-on page. Obviously, if you don't need that functionality, you can and should disable it as @Sampei.Nihira did.
  17. Mathwiz
    Yes, it does; and Chase is working on my old phone again. Firefox retains compatibility with phones even older than mine - although I went with 115 instead of 125, just to be stubborn. At least I know I can upgrade again when that nag comes back, and the phone itself will work as long as I don't drop it and 4G still exists. (4G will go away at some point, but my old phone probably has another year or two left.) Almost certainly, at least if you use Facebook/Instagram/Snapchat. At least Meta isn't quite as pervasive as Alphabet (yet); you can avoid using anything Meta owns - at least, if you know that they own it! But the whole darn Internet buys Google ads, uses Google products and services, watches YouTube videos (even on other sites), etc.
  18. Mathwiz
    Good question; here's an answer, straight from Moonchild himself: https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=62&t=18678#p137637 TL;DR: Using https to encapsulate another protocol is inefficient, and a VPN would accomplish the same thing more efficiently; therefore DoH isn't needed. Counter-arguments are provided in other posts on the thread. I agree that it's inefficient, but I'm not sure everyone is willing to haul out the VPN sledgehammer just to thwart ISP snooping. After all, if you don't trust your ISP, you're probably skeptical of most commercial VPNs too. DoH lets you separate the knowledge of your browsing into different buckets: your ISP knows which IP addresses you visit, but not which sites at those addresses; the DoH provider knows which sites your IP address is looking up, but not who you are (only your ISP - and probably Google - know that), nor which of those sites are active visits and which are just "noise" from browser plugins and whatnot. (Of course, if you're really worried about these things, you should probably choose a DoH provider other than Google!)
  19. Mathwiz
    Interesting. I may have to go this route on Win 7. As much as I love @roytam1's Serpent, it looks increasingly like the end is near. My hunch (that's all it is) would be no. The author wouldn't expect anyone to run r3dfox on Win 10 since they could just run vanilla Mo. Besides, why? The question reminds me a bit of @Jody Thornton's request for a 64-bit build of MailNews. Sure, it could be done - the program could check the Windows version and then make different OS calls based on the result - but what advantage would it bring?
  20. Mathwiz
    You're right, but it's not a matter of DoH someday becoming the "only option" because the last holdout, MCP, finally caved and supported it! DoH's mere existence threatens ad blocking at the router. Let's say you have a Roku app, which of course is completely unrelated to your computer or Web browser. The author of that app doesn't want you to block ads, so he/she/it already has a huge financial incentive to build DoH into the app so you can't. And DoH already exists, so there's nothing (besides a little development cost) to stop the author from doing so. Thanks for the suggestions, but what does it buy me? You of all people should know how much work it takes to remove all the telemetry from 360Chrome. BTW, the soon-to-be-minimum versions at chase.com are Chrome 116 and FF 115. The former won't run on W7, so it's either Supermium, Thorium, one of the 360Chrome versions above, or Mo (my new abbreviation for modern Firefox) 115 ESR. I think I trust Supermium v118 most, but in any case, there's very little true choice left among "modern" browsers. Edit: I just learned of r3dfox (pronounced "red fox"), a Win 7-compatible fork of Mo that will hopefully outlast v115 ESR. Which proves the point @VistaLover was making - that's only five versions above your current "primary" and only five versions older than the "latest and [supposedly] greatest." Google has us all on their "upgrade" treadmill now, even if you skip a handful of versions each time.
  21. Mathwiz
    Well, that explains the otherwise odd-seeming upping of the required minimum from 113 to 115, at least, if it's the last Win 7-compatible version. In any event, Chase lowered the boom rather quickly this time. I can no longer sign in using either Serpent or 360EE. There appears to be a JSON parsing error in my Chase-specific StructuredClone polyfill. @UCyborg's more sophisticated polyfill doesn't do the trick either since it doesn't handle self-referential objects (same problem as with the StructuredClone built into UXP). Also not working: Chrome 106 on Android 6.0. Edge 109 (on Win 7) still works (so, I assume, Chrome 109 would too), but for how long? It too now has the ominous "We'll stop supporting this browser soon" nag. FF 115 ESR will presumably have a somewhat longer lifespan, but the end is in sight there too. Looks like it's gonna be Thorium and/or Supermium in my future, whether I like non-unGoogled Chromium derivatives or not. I appreciate your honesty; but I daresay your "not-so-humble" opinion very likely puts you out of step with the vast majority of MSFN members. Yes, I know you "upgraded" to Windows 10 and are currently using Chromium 114, so perhaps you don't care what happens to those of us who still use earlier Windows versions (even 8.1); but there will come a day when your OS/browser will stop working too, at which point I will be overjoyed to remind you of your "not-so-humble" opinion! I just rename the folder; e.g., rename "New Moon" to "Old Moon" (delete the "Old Moon" folder first, if it still exists from the last update) and restore the new version into a new "New Moon" folder. I even wrote a batch file that automates the process. You don't lose any settings (unless you made your New Moon installation portable). Yes, I noticed that too, some time ago. It's a longstanding bug that also affects the pages shown by long-clicking the Back button. I just decided to live with it. I think their discussion was specifically about DNS over HTTPS, which wasn't a thing until long after XP EOS. Unfortunately, not likely, given MCP's position: DoH is a double-edged sword. It can be used to conceal your browsing habits from your ISP (probably a good thing) but it can also be used by apps to thwart ad blockers like Pi-Hole, which most users would consider a bad thing. But as usual, MCP fails to understand that their decision not to support DoH will have exactly zero effect on its "bad" uses coming to fruition; all it does is mean that Pale Moon users can't easily avail themselves of its "good" uses. (The apostrophe - D'OH - was clever though.)
  22. Mathwiz
    https://www.tomsguide.com/ looks to me like that stupid link rel="preload" issue we also see at Micro$oft's Web pages. Proxomitron and/or Modify HTTP Response might be able to fix it. Someday I'll find the person who came up with that "preload" nonsense and wring his neck. AFAICS it accomplishes nothing other than breaking Web pages on older browsers. OTOH, I cannot understand why MCP still hasn't addressed link rel="preload" in UXP. It's been an issue for a long time, it breaks major sites like Micro$oft's, and (although I'll admit I don't know enough to be sure) it doesn't seem like something that would be all that hard to implement.
  23. Mathwiz
    To me, that indeed sounds like the most plausible explanation, especially considering that they did not increase the minimum version for Chrome/Edge! Although if "security" is the reason, I would've expected them to require at least the WebP fix, which V115 lacks.
  24. Mathwiz
    Hi folks! My bank's site, chase.com, is once again upping the minimum browser version for Firefox. (This hasn't yet been implemented. At this point, a nag appears if your user agent reports a version that's "too old," but everything still works - for now.) The last time they did this, they raised the minimum to v113, and I changed my user agent to match that minimum. This time, they're raising it to ... v115. Setting the user agent to v115 or later removes the nag. I was flabbergasted! I half expected v117, the last version for Windows 7, at least. What's the point of raising the minimum by a mere two versions? What did FF v115 bring to the CSS/Javascript table that Chase just had to have? I'm anticipating a future breakage of chase.com with bated breath.
  25. Mathwiz
    From the r3dfox readme:
×
×
  • Create New...