schwups
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by schwups
-
-
Which msvcrt version does this refer to? Every version have different dependencies.
ExKernel can't load without kext. Some additional APIs are required.
My MD5 of ExKernel: 215C38470A3D6325D58A4C24C975CB38
0 -
Completed with NVSIZE BIOS PATCH: Now DXDIAG gives 506MB VRAM. It has reduced available 32bit RAM by 512MB.
3008MB => 2496MB
POST: 7104MB => 6592MB
1 -
Tested and confirmed FAT32 detection by default - without registry entry!
1 hour ago, defuser said:Most likely, some volume is reserved by the built-in graphics. This value can usually be changed in the BIOS. I also have 8GB, but the ramdisk size is different:
P965 hasn't built-in graphics, but yes the reserved size is different for each board. POST gives 7104MB here, what is quite little.
0 -
I found my mistake. Setting the command path beforehand on system seems crucial.
On 8/20/2024 at 11:07 AM, Drugwash said:- the command path (either in pure DOS mode or Safe mode DOS window) is set to [C:\]WINDOWS\SYSTEM;
Until now I thought it doesn't matter and I could enter the entire path starting from the command path C:\, which apparently doesn't work in this case. In any case, the new file was created without comment and confirmation. Thanks to you all again.
0 -
It was a bit strange with the reg file. It was allegedly successfully merged into the registry, but "UseFAT16"=hex:00 was missing. So I merged it manually. Now I have indeed 3.99GB FAT32! Thanks.
0 -
Thanks to you both.
There is no "read only" and the ShutdownPatcher patches the file.
So far I thought upper and lower case doesn't matter.
I'll check everything else.
0 -
4 hours ago, SweetLow said:
Under Windows ME on RAM drive you should get FAT32 volume (not FAT16) by default with size ~4.5 GiB on 8 GiB RAM.
Sorry, of course I mean RAMDrive and not swap file.
It is to be assumed that the drive should grow accordingly with size of RAM and switch to FAT32 by default. The question is why this didn't happen here.
0 -
I had installed 8GB, too. In this case the size of the
swap fileRAMDrive remains at 1.99 FAT without setting anything. Is this correct?0 -
On 8/17/2024 at 8:23 PM, Joaquim said:
is there any patch for add 'send to...' on context menu?(inlued the removal drives)
Do you mean, that you don't have "Send To" in your context menu or do you only need "Unplug or Eject Hardware" inside SendTo?
The start order of "Unplug or Eject Hardware" is "RunDll32.exe shell32.dll,Control_RunDLL hotplug.dll".
Maybe somebody here can write you a simple bat/cmd file.
0 -
On 6/30/2024 at 6:18 PM, roytam1 said:
tested and it seems to be work, put some effort to integrate it to my GreenPad:
https://github.com/RamonUnch/GreenPad/issues/58#issuecomment-2198607531
Did you compiled a browser with this change to test?
0 -
Yes, probably no time bomb. I also just set the clock back 5 years - to no avail.
0 -
My condolences. I wish you the necessary strength. My Mother still lives and is 91 years old. First I only compared MD5 of PTCHNVSZ.zip and PATCHNVC.EXE. These are the same. NVCheck and NVSize work. Thanks for sharing.
0 -
No problems so far, also with swap file set to max size.
0 -
I hope you are doing well. I want to set the clock back a few years next and if that doesn't work I check it on another machine. Or is it possible, that the patch is broken?
0 -
Check the requirements:
https://web.archive.org/web/20071220153359/http://www.nero.com/enu/downloads-nero7-98me.php
or try version 6
0 -
I tried to install R.Loews "NVIDIA GRAPHICS CARD SIZE PATCH" (PTCHNVSZ.zip) for a GF7950GT 512MB. I got "cannot open source file" on prompt "PATCHNVC NVCORE.BAK NVCORE.VXD". What am I doing wrong or does anyone have an idea?
0 -
First test was OK - without blue screen. Swap file set to max 1000 on RamDrive.
0 -
I always remove the flash drive before shutting down. On start the flash drive messes up my partition order, so that my desktop partition shortcuts no longer work. I can't remember, if there where other start problems.
The bootlog should be directly in partition C.
0 -
I've tried it and it works. My RAMDisk is a bit small with a size of 1.99GB FAT. I used a stored board P5B (up to 8 GB RAM) from the basement and put a 450 Conroe-L single core on it. (6 GB RAM DDR2 - 800 => 3008MB RAM + 1.99GB RAMDisk)
--------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 2.2 (C) 2007-2008 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
--------------------------------------------------Sequential Read : 1527.052 MB/s
Sequential Write : 1505.381 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 1476.697 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 1439.799 MB/s
Random Read 4KB : 669.878 MB/s
Random Write 4KB : 587.463 MB/sTest Size : 100 MB
Date : 2024/08/16 23:08:53HD Tach version 2.70
Drive: SweetLowRAM Drive PSE 0000
Access time: 0.0ms
CPU utilization: 100.0%
63 zones to be tested (32768kb zones).Burst speed: 2481.8MB/s
Average read speed: 34120 -
Nero 8 is probably untested with (latest) KernelEx, so there is no workaround.
0 -
KernelEx 4.5.2: It is suitable for end users. It allows to run Firefox 3.6.28 or 9.0.1. For issues and solutions see KernelEx Wiki on WaybackMachine. The nss updates by RoyTam are also required for these Firefox versions. Javascript is too old for modern websites. It's usually better to turn it off to ensure stability.
Little history: KernelEx 4.5.2016.16 was the first version with the possibility to start Firfox 24+ or a Firefox 24+ based browser (fork). Kex Update 18 brought improvements with regard to Firefox profile creation.
20 hours ago, Radovan said:So if I download and install this kernelex KernelEx 4.5.2016 the website display better?
As defuser already said, Roytam's browsers, based on Palemoon 28 or Firefox 52, generally display most sites fairly correctly. You should install latest KernelEx, but it's still in development and test phase - not really ready for end users.
0 -
On 7/8/2024 at 10:37 PM, schwups said:
I think the driver 82.69 isn't 100% compatible with G71 / G72 chips. Maybe you can find something about GF 7300 here on Msfn board 9x/ME, if you search. I've a 7900GS (G71) and yes there is a black screen on ME start for a second that doesn't really bother me. This doesn't happen with the G70.
My black screen is apparently caused by old FritzDSL (2005) software in combination with a Geforce G71/72/73.
0 -
Ok, you have set compatible mode in BIOS.
8GB RAM - then you can also test R Loew's RAMDSK32/64 or SweetLow's ramdrv4m.
Is DMA enabled in DeviceManager/DiskDrives/Drive Properties/Settings?
2TB HDD: Make sure, that RLoew's HIGH CAPACITY DISK PATCH and TERABYTE PLUS PACKAGE is included (in Patchmem CAB files?) to avoid data loss.
0 -
Yes, I still have it, but I hardly use it. (Java 1.8.0.292 (Azul Zulu 8.54.0.21)) I just tried jdownloader-portable-17334 2024-05-24. I think it's still running fine. Good to know.
0
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Posted · Edited by schwups
Serpent, NM28: I get an error in gkmedias.dll, e.g. qwant.com. There is no error, if I replace the file with the one from last week. However, I haven't started with a fresh profile yet, nor do I have tried it on a clean XPSP3.