Jump to content

gUiTaR_mIkE

Member
  • Posts

    105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    United States

Everything posted by gUiTaR_mIkE

  1. True - the more resources you have available to the guest OS the better. I know for the simple task of loading a test OS, running it through it's paces, clicking around, checking for errors, in fact I even programmed in my VM with VB6 Enterprise, wxPython, and used HTML Workshop - a Host system (XP SP3) with 1GB of RAM on an Athlon XP 1.533 Ghz CPU (or equivalent) should allow a Guest OS (XP SP3 or older) to load and function just fine - it did for me. Anything more recent like Vista or 7 would not be worth the effort but I have installed XP, 2K, a Linux breed or 2 on this setup with no problems, booting the host to a bare minimum - about 20% resources used, offering 512MB to the guest OS - no speed records were broken but the OS was usable. Anyway, having read thru this thread a bit I can see some issues so I don't want to add to your frustration, suffice it to say a VM would be the best option for testing your new install disks over installing to your main system. Also, most if not all the projects seem to be geared towards updating an installation disk so bone up on the jargon - slipping patches (hotfixes) versus addon packs, source disk, extracting the zip (or 7z) files, folder structure used, running .cmd or .bat files (you may want to open the files in Notepad, have a look at the logic), expect to offer full unedited error messages, explain in detail (leave out the non essential stuff) the steps you were performing. Get any tools (utilities) setup ahead of time - like 7zip, and get used to how they work. Don't use your desktop for your project - use a safe partition with plenty of space available for the project folder and new image file. It's no excuse (I'm guilty on another forum) being short but understand these guys have offered the same explanations ad nauseam so the quicker to the point with a hint of effort does help soften the blow
  2. You may want to use a virtual machine to test your images before bothering with a full blown install - sorry if you already intended to do so
  3. just wonderin', what's the name of your cousin's corporation, what line of work is he / she in?
  4. I think the item is 'ToolTip'
  5. You might look into AutoPatcher's .Net Framework Addon, I'm sure there are other options as well. This is pretty simple for a running system. Also, you might get by with 3.5 and 4.0 - I would install 3.5 first, reboot, confirm no errors during the install, then install 4.0. If all goes well, then I would install any additional updates after the base is in place. Read This! short post on setting up APUP to download the release. Instead of XP SP3, select .Net Framework when following the instructions. Note, the program will detect your OS, uncheck whatever OS is selected, you only want .Net, the first 2 selections are needed so keep them checked.
  6. Sorry, typo, meant mp3. Agreed! This is a time consuming task, the more you care about the result the more you want to get it right the first time, during the capture and edit phases. Set it and forget it isn't in the vocabulary of an audio editor, or engineer - which is what you will be acting as There are many 'for fee' tools you can use but really, a decent wav editor should clean up just about any wav file - Wavosaur is one such tool and it runs on 98/XP/Vista, and free. I would suggest playback and capture at 0db or slighly above (yellow, no red). On your deck, no Dolby, etc buttons activated. Go easy on the 'color' (effects) you apply to the files, if anything add 'color' during the editing process, not while you're recording (capturing) the tape. Finally, unlike the tape that degrades a bit each and every playback the digital file (still a lossy source though) will remain the same after 1000 playbacks (assuming the file remains intact) - so take your time, you'll be proud of your efforts. Good luck.
  7. I'm not sure if an app exists that will cut at the correct spot, name tracks etc without a cue file or some sort of index. Also, most users want an opprtunity to edit so in many cases capturing to wav is ideal but... Check out Audacity and Total Recorder Pro, if for nothing more than excellent tips on recording. The eval version of TRP you may not like, I wouldn't bother. I've used both methods and they work great, I wanted wav files to edit, you may be able to export directly to .mps with Audacity - not sure, TRP yes, but costs.
  8. I believe you're correct ...MS11-003 - Critical (KB2482017) - http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS11-003.mspx ...Replaces - MS10-090 (KB2416400) & (KB2467659) - http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS10-090.mspx
  9. So true. A simple thank you for reading my topic and taking time to respond isn't much to ask - the lack of civility 'I think' turns some people off from helping on forums. Picture this, you're in Home Depot and somone walks up to you and asks "can you direct me to the paint isle", you help them, and the person turns and walks away - is there much of a differenece (rhetorical). my $0.02 - and dead horse beaten
  10. Nice script -X-, good work. Does the script verify the downloads or does nlite? The reason I ask, the script showed KB89083O-v3.15.cab as 8+ MB, the file downloaded was 1KB in size, the second run, the script saw the file name, seemed to ignore the size, showed it as present and moved on. Btw, is the # correct for this file - 89083O - it seems the last '0' is in fact an 'O', not a zero. I guess I should pay attention - I was using another tool and it was that tool that downloads the larger MRT *.exe, I see now what you're doing with the .cab file. Anyway, nice script but I guess it's geared towards an always-on connection, the script moved right over WindowsXP-KB958644-x86-ENU.exe with only 79K downloaded after resuming from a disconnect.
  11. Start with using the same size for both 'Intial' and 'Maximum' - also, there are differing views on the size but usually 1.5 times the amount of physical RAM works... 1GB ( 1024 MB ) ~ use 1536 MB ~ ( 1024 x 1.5 = 1536 MB ) // 2GB ( 2048 MB ) ~ use 3072 MB ~ ( 2048 x 1.5 = 3072 MB ) ... Make sure you have plenty of hard drive space Btw, this is a recommendation (for a healthy system) so don't change anything from the above recommendations until you fix your problem. Also, you might try running 'System File Checker' ( sfc.exe ) and scan your system for changes to important system files.
  12. @johnb0647 The easiest way to do this and stay legal is to use a method that downloads directly from Microsoft's servers all Microsoft updates - the torrent method would be illegal. Post #2 offers an option, and post #3 is a method I'm familiar with - AutoPatcher - your needs are exactly why AutoPatcher was created. The latest Official release is about 293 MB for the Windows XP SP3 package that tries to match WU/MU requirements. I don't recommend using AutoPatcher to slipstream the updates, there are better tools for that but in terms of getting all the updates to one location and having a nice GUI to install them on multiple systems AutoPatcher is ideal for this task - or copy them to another program for slipstreaming. See post #2 for links - read here for a quick intro to getting started using APUP and AutoPatcher Btw, you're preaching to the choir when you mention your slow connect speed, I'm stuck with a dialup connection that runs @ 3.1 KBps - I download everything at this rate including AutoPatcher as well .NET 3.5, Xp's SP3 and so on - you do what you have to do I suppose.
  13. Don't know if these programs will satisfy all your needs but the best feature - they're free I would start with gizmo's Best Free Computer Chess list, or the few offerings from TPFC's chess search.
  14. I had the exact same problem as stated in post #1 when attempting to log in tonight at around 7pm... third time was a charm - using Firefox 4beta7
  15. I'm not sure why some of you feel this is a difficult question, the OP asked for opinions basically. I don't view any forum response as gospel truth, I view it as an appreciated opinion only. Most of us have built a few computers for our own use as well helped others so we should have come in contact with at least three or four different brands. I have had to dink with every board listed in CoffeeFiend's post, less Intel... which I am surprised by the views, I guess I would have expected a unanimous "there greaaaat", the CPUs are (usually) I agree with CoffeeFiend and say use that post as a guide, it is pretty accurate and mentions the important things to keep in mind. ASUS and Gigabyte have always been top notch for me. I have boards right now that have been running mostly around the clock for about 7 years (approaching 60,000 hrs) - the ASUS A7V8X for one. I will add though, this machine stays cool, dust free (as possible), is powered by a name brand stable power supply, and is protected by a quality UPS - this matters when it comes to longevity of a system. It should be said the aforementioned brands do lay an egg once in a while - so do your research. Again, this is my opinion from my experience - take it for what its worth - about $0.02
  16. If anyone is still interested, here's the link direct from Microsoft... I'm on dialup so I can't test again but I know it worked fine a few months ago. ...directx_feb2010_redist.exe Size: 109072752 MD5: 4CF007A355CB5F34A3C5C400113B33C3
  17. This might be old news by now but if isn't, it looks as if with the release of Flash 10.1 the switches have changed. ...More Info!
  18. @morland Have a look at SIW 2010, it may offer most of what you want in a report. The freeware version allows for the creation of an 'html' report only. I wanted a list of all installed updates, I like the final product. The 'html' file is easily edited if you don't like a few of the additional bits of info, including a 'banner ad' and a request for a cup of coffee if you like the program - both as links. The 'Report' list can be modified, go to 'Tools' - 'Options' - 'Report', or click 'Options' and check / uncheck what you would like the report to include. You can see a comparison of features between the free and pro versions. I like the standalone (portable) version - 'siw.exe' - no installer. Anyway, have a look if interested. ...Comparison - Pro vs. Free ...Downloads
  19. I'll start off by saying - I'm not of Elvis' generation but his impact on my household as a child will forever be appreciated. I recall with fondness my early years growing up, how my mom would clean the house while listening to him sing - what a treat. I also remember coming home from junior high one day, my mom was crying her eyes out, I was terrified, my sister said she's crying because Elvis, he's gone. I will admit I didn't cry but, I knew I would miss him, and his contribution to the music business would go on for many years. He was a genuine 'rags to riches' story, uneducated, impoverished, but had a drive likely motivated by what some would term - natural talent, emotional honesty in his voice, and not bad looking to boot. I doubt we will ever see again talents and ground breaking innovation on the level of The Beatles, Wall of Sound, Motown, or Elvis. I am very strange when it comes to my music listening (and playing) habits. I was raised on guitar by the likes of Eddie Van Halen, George Lynch, Michael Schenker, Warren DeMartini, and many others but, I enjoy just as much great songs from those 70s compilation sets, you know, all those folks whose name you don't recognize but the song, don't lie, admit it, you somehow know all the words. Wait, I'm talking about Elvis. There are lots of favorites but 2 I'm really fond of are 'Suspicious Minds' (thanks Francis Zambon) and 'In The Ghetto' (thanks Mac Davis). Anyway, happy birthday Elvis, you're gone but not forgotten.
  20. VSTHost v1.47 - latest Version - still being developed. If you do much with digital audio either recording or editing, and need / want to test out VST instruments or effects before you drop them into your DAW - VSTHost is a great tool for the job (it can do more). The latest version (listed above) runs on the following OSes -> Windows 98, ME, NT4, 2000, and XP. Mike
  21. XP Pro would better suit your system specs as they are now, if you could add more RAM this may benefit Windows 7. You could always run the Windows 7 Upgrade Advisor and see what the software recommends. Windows 7 is the future but XP is a very worthwhile OS - even after all these years.
  22. UFO (Lights Out) - "Lights Out" ...wait, the track is winding down - 3,2,1 - foobar is searching for the next random tune from my flac collection ...nice pick foobar The Endless Summer II Soundtrack - "Escape" by Gary Hoey
  23. I know in the English version SP2 is all that is needed (it includes everything from SP1 that is relevant) so you very well could have more updates than necessary - "update_xxx.v1" from SP1 and "update_xxx.v2" from SP2, or updates no longer needed due to fixes applied by simply running the service pack (registry edits and so on). If you're good to go I wouldn't worry but it may be worth investigating.
  24. I just checked and it looks to be around $60 U.S.. Hopefully you can find a few free videos to watch that may offer a tip or two but I would not pay any money. You might also want to look at youtube as well. I only suggest videos because it may help by actually hearing and watching rather than just reading. You might also look into finding a forum or newsgroup that focuses on C++ - I bet there are a few out there. I forgot to mention The CodeGuru forums - have a look.
  25. There may be a few videos at ShowMeDo Video Tutorials that will be helpful. I believe the Club videos require a membership of some sort. Mike
×
×
  • Create New...