Lost Soul

id have to agree with you there on both counts

its looking nice guys very user friendly it seems

lol

thanks for trying to help ripken204 im afraid the components in the pc are just too old and the pc needs a major upgrade like everything new lol, but my friend will have to survive on using the power button to turn there pc off until they can afford to build a new pc, there mobo and the majority of all there pc parts are about 7 years old grrr they have a 300mhz cpu with 64mb pc100 i boosted it up to 190mb pc100 ram now by installing a new ram stick just so they could take the jump on most progs plus it helped out on the transition from 98 to xp once again thanks

ok heres the update so far after enabling the apm, it creates a none turn off pc resulting in when you turn the power off it restarts i tried to fix this by takinga chance on turning off the system restart inccase of an error well the result when powering down was the blue screen of death with the error IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL any body got any ideals

yea i looked there but it dosnt have the answer the pc is apm compliant, but i found this page and it says that some ppl have the restart effect after the enable the apm and then some ppl have the opposite of it http://aumha.org/win5/a/shtdwnxp.php im still not really sure what to do yet,, one thing im gonna try is to disable automatic restarts in case of errors , i cant flash the bios because they dont have any upgrades available for the mobo

hi im just finishing up an upgrade by clean instal from 98se to xp pro and i noticed the pc wasnt powering off correctly, it was poping up to the screen that says "its now safe to turn off your pc" well the normal procedur to fix this is to enable apm in the power managment of the pc, but for some odd reason when i did this, it bypasses the its safe to turn off the pc screen, but then it sets its self in a loop and it just turns back on after youve already hit turn off, so in return you cant ever turn the pc off, because it automatically turns it self backl on like a restart strange problem, does any body know what i should do to fix this one

ok for anybody reading along, i figured out the problem, it seems for this particular network card, the windows default drivers installed and they needed to be uninstalled to update to the real drivers so it wouldnt read realtek but the real network card then the other reason i wasnt able to connect off internet is because i need a router to share off my ip address therefor with out one i was getting the typical 169 response meaning no ip when in actuallity when tested id want some thing to start with a 192 or a 172 for a valid ip

ok so far ive done some research and im not sure about this well the ethernet card that i just installed recently says its compatible with pci bus specification revision 2.2 and later and i believe the revision for the pci's on the mobo are very old about 1.0 or so but it did installed successfully and does show up fine with working status in the device manager would this be the problem on why i cant connect to a DHCP-server to fully register a ip network type connection

man thats sweet totoymola,, can you tell me whats the benifits of doing yours and simons method of pe as compared to ubcd4win ? im just trying to geta better ideal of the differences, i have a ubcd4win already made but i want to be able to have a nicer custom style like yours so im thinking of starting from scratch and learning to do it yours and simons way and i most definatly like the window blinds ideal, silver is nice

hi i just reset a older pc with a fresh instal from 98 to xp pro and i also installed a new ethernet card i installed the drivers for it and i checked it through in device manager and the card is working fine it says but when i try to set up a connection it says limited or no connectivity problem occured because the network did not assign a network address to the computer now i tried testing this out with my cable(internet) because i know my internet is good i just wanted to get the pc up and running to see everything work but i get that problem does any one know how i can try to fix this issue ?

nice thanks for pointing that out i didnt know that,

yea i was thinkiing of testing some thing similar to that im vmware but is there any dills that work with ms paint do you know, im trying to avoid conflict

yea i know how to silent instal it but is there really way to just replace paint with paint.net,, thats tricky i know

lmao

is there any way to actually replace the excisting ms paint with paint.net . id like to try to replace it, but im not really sure how or if its even possible,, has any one ever tried this ?

lol i dont see that working good at all lol

god im a Pentium II

very impressive guys

it seems your getting closer and closer

its already added i posted the beta a while back but it lacked a good refresh rate, and its video confrencing pailed in comparison to cq phone, so far that has the best video confrencing ive seen yet, the video portion is super fast

ive always supported xpize, it adds a nice visual effect to the setup keep up the great work, i look forward to many more releases of xpize

go for it m8, tweak it, improve it, alter it, its all good change it any way you like throws the ball to blinktd, its in your court now

nice you have domain names now

nice tip,