Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/21/2024 in all areas
-
4 points
-
32bit NVIDIA GeForce 930MX,NVIDIA Quadro M620,NVIDIA GeForce 940MX https://www.catalog.update.microsoft.com/ScopedViewInline.aspx?updateid=59760e3d-594b-4c78-b534-25a4d06d7a194 points
-
AOMEI Partition Assistant can copy or clone partitions or disks. Here is a versions comparison in German: https://www.aomei.de/partition-manager/comparison.html I personally have installed the Professional Edition of AOMEI Partition Assistant and AOMEI Backupper.3 points
-
The original question and the topic title made a clear emphasis on Windows Vista compatibility, unfortunately, the benchmark is of no relevance since both cards aren't officially supported on Vista, thus we can safely assume that test had been made on Windows 7 (at least).3 points
-
To sell more DX12 graphic cards? I dunno. What I'm sure of, it doesn't need DX12 with those graphics, agree. DX9, at best.3 points
-
NVIDIA - Display - 2/27/2018 12:00:00 AM - 23.21.13.8908 https://catalog.s.download.windowsupdate.com/d/msdownload/update/driver/drvs/2018/05/4ee22897-1c0d-4356-b1a5-974681195416_aeed8c8fc3e795a6cac8c55437660c016c425f97.cab3 points
-
NVIDIA - Display - 26.21.14.3206 https://www.catalog.update.microsoft.com/ScopedViewInline.aspx?updateid=59760e3d-594b-4c78-b534-25a4d06d7a193 points
-
No. Star Wars: Battlefront is a series of classic games that was launched in 2004. (twenty years ago!) In 2024 they just added an artificial block to fend off windows 7 and below. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars:_Battlefront https://store.steampowered.com/app/2446550/STAR_WARS_Battlefront_Classic_Collection/ That's why it makes sense to post here.2 points
-
1 point
-
What I recommend to try - perform "4K alignment" it's known to help XP in some cases. Since Windows XP doesn't support 512e . The procedure was popular some decades ago. https://www.minitool.com/lib/4k-alignment.html "Although 512e solves the compatibility problem and it doesn’t force complicated changes in computing system, it still has some defects. Actually, the translation process of 512e sacrifices its performance to a certain extent, especially in writing performance. When you write a data that is neither a multiple of 4K nor aligned to a 4K boundary (4K misalignment, click 4K alignment to know more), a operation known as read-modify-write (RMW) is performed, which can result in a perceptible impact on writing performance to users." Source: https://www.partitionwizard.com/help/what-is-advanced-format.html1 point
-
STAR WARS: Battlefront Classic Collection Genres: Action, Shooter, First-person, Third-person, 3D Companies: Pandemic Studios, Aspyr Media Requires Windows 8 and above1 point
-
1 point
-
Crisis Core: Final Fantasy VI REUNION, Genres: Action, RPG, Japanese Companies: Square Enix, TOSE CO., LTD. This game requires Windows 10 and up.1 point
-
Is there any progress in fixing the broken MSFN post editor? For months, editing/updating of old posts is definitely a game of chance and in certain cases rather a torture. At this point, I should mention that I have a lot of posts which have to be updated on a regular base. Thus, I am particularly affected.1 point
-
Why should I feel discredited? Such renaming by using the console is elementary and old practice. I already did it that way in the good old DOS days. But if batch renaming other parts of files, I always use the multi-rename tool of Total Commander.1 point
-
Right! This function does not exist in Windows XP SP3 natively but in Total Commander. You can easily open a CMD window in whatever folder you want by clicking onto the entry Open command prompt window. It is located under the menu bar item Commands.1 point
-
I totally agree! All files self-compiled from batch sources are considered to be intrinsically vulnerable by AV scanners. Of course! But these files aren't more or less liked by AV scanners than my other ones. Hope dies last!1 point
-
Using a different compiler I could reduce the false positives of OpenLANSet.exe from 19 to 15. No false positives from Avast and Malwarebytes anymore!1 point
-
A few code changes, and the results are different! Unfortunately, opening and closing of the IE Proxy Settings easily is a wanted function. If I left it out, these two programs would be senseless.1 point
-
Ok, thanks for your opinion! I'll try to reduce these false positives as much as I can. Important for me are only established, well-known AV scanners, the big players in this business.1 point
-
Sorry, you're righr! Confgure PopMenu.exe, of course! Too much proxy in my head! I already know these results, and that wasn't the problem, either. I am interested in your opinion about these results.1 point
-
Thanks again for your tests and observations! Now you may understand what I mean. It's very strange and gets stranger if I modify code or use another compiler. A little change of a code snippet, and my Avast doesn't trigger a warning, and so on. I hate that! Please, try to scan StartProxy.exe, Confgure PopMenu.exe and SetupMin2Tray.exe on VirusTotal! What do you think about the results?1 point
-
I forgot to mention that I referred to compilers which convert batch files to executables. I believe that the real problem lies in code snippets that are often used by script kiddies or hobby hackers. If this code appears in clean programs, then some AV scanners generate these false positives. Any further ideas? And, after some tests using different compilers, it also seems to depend on the compiler itself. Converted files by a frequently used compiler trigger more false positives than those by a less used one. That was kind of to be expected and makes sense!1 point
-
Thanks for your observation! It's all a bit strange. You said Malwarebytes premium didn't trigger any warnings for you, but the Malwarebytes online scanner on VirusTotal does! Check, for example, the file StartProxy.exe, and you'll see what I mean!1 point