Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/11/2024 in all areas

  1. Thanks for the nice compliment and for the tip! There is definitely nothing I wouldn't try to solve these crappy crashes. Strangely, Thorium works perfectly in my Windows XP SP3 POSReady installation, i.e., without any crashes. And there, these DLL files exist from the very first.
    4 points
  2. Old chrome had --user-data-dir="...\data" instead of --user-data-dir="..\data" I don't remember exactly.
    4 points
  3. Hello our dear @Astroskipper, the pillar of wisdom! How do you do? @D.Draker taught me to delete Vulkan, Swiftshader and D3D 47, perhaps try it? Have a nice evening!
    3 points
  4. Dear @D.Draker, could you be so kind to also include the 32-bit option of this one, thank you!
    2 points
  5. Uxpatcher is a bit on the shady side, as it modifies Windows files, I'm afraid people here won't give you the links.
    2 points
  6. Constantly having the same password problem when they reset it whenever they want. It's the same with facebook, btw, my grandma told me.
    2 points
  7. I tried both. The last try was native Thorium without anything. No extensions, no additional flags and no Chrome XP API Adapter from IDA-RE-things, following the main principle to go back to the roots if it doesn't work.
    2 points
  8. That's good to know. In both systems, all runtimes have been installed.
    2 points
  9. Those were the good times when didn't have to give our phone numbers to every bystander. Now I go on vacation, I can't even login to Instagram 'cause their "security" triggers and blocks my account due to "suspicious location". Nothing suspicious in it! I tried log in from the Dutch overseas territories, from a public hotel WiFi spot, so what? I wonder what other people do? How do they live? No one goes on vacations anymore? Everyone is chained to only one location?
    2 points
  10. I use only randomly generated passwords. Change in about 6 months or so.
    2 points
  11. Supermium can work by enabling IPC access, but I'm not sure if it's safe
    1 point
  12. Original documentation: https://g0ul4sh.top/2022/04/22/escaping-sandboxie-classic-5-55-13/ WINXP doesn't have NtGetNextThread API, so Sandboxie under XP might not be affected by CVE-2022-28067
    1 point
  13. https://msfn.org/board/topic/183046-guide-vista-extended-kernel-installation You can copy x64 files manually or replace extended files in syswow64 with original ones after using the installer. I never install 32-bit files because they break some programs that work in vanilla while x64 ones never do. (x64 java control panel is an x64 application, so it shouldn't be affected, but idk),
    1 point
  14. Saxon is being objective. My purely personal opinion regarding updates, especially XP updates, they slow down your PC. I'm not taking sides, and there's no need to do that. I'm not participating in any "formations", or whatever someone earlier tried to insinuate. Does my opinion match yours? Good! It also matches @Gansangriff's, too! My respect to @AstroSkipper is huge, nevertheless.
    1 point
  15. Genuine Windows XP Professional is what I have on my notebook, I'm sorry, I have no plans to install any updates at all. Thorium and Supermium both launch fine.
    1 point
  16. Just for clarification. I am not a self-proclaimed "mathematician" but just a mathematician. I have not announced anything here, but only mentioned it in passing. No more, no less. As part of my search for the cause of the spontaneous Thorium crashes, I formed a lot of hypotheses and had to unfortunately reject them. And I have investigated many things as part of my hypotheses. But so far without success.
    1 point
  17. Yep! A clean, genuine Windows XP Professional. Only the service pack SP3 and all post SP3 updates until 2014. POSReady stuff has never been applied to this partition.
    1 point
  18. @K4sum1 Thank you for doing public releases of lun3r and Hydra. I prefer to use a browser based on Pale Moon, and I build browsers based on Arctic-Fox/Pale Moon 27, so it's nice to have a browser that I can leave running, while testing my own browsers that share the Pale Moon profile.
    1 point
  19. Sometimes high, sometimes low. I can't recognise any particular pattern.
    1 point
  20. Any ideas what can cause these sudden closings of Thorium? My hardware can't be the causer, though. Has anyone had similar problems?
    1 point
  21. @Dave-H If your plan doesn't work, consider my strategy then. The steps are necessary for further steps I wanted to perform. And I don't know whether they work with an old Chrome as default. The Internet Explorer is automatically set as default browser by Windows XP if no other has been set by the user.
    1 point
  22. You can make any other browser, which has already properly been installed in your system, the default, of course. Important is to get rid of everything related to Thorium. When done, check if the old Chromium correctly works as your temporary, default browser.
    1 point
  23. 1 point
  24. Well, a couple of days ago, I up-voted six (or so) of your posts in one day, all because I really liked them, I only place likes on what I like. Just post good, interesting content, people will get you the "likes", including me. As for Vista beta games on XP and this old thread, the bot actually helped me to find it by bumping this old thread. Thanks, dear bot.
    1 point
  25. The name is so generic, really hard to memorise.
    1 point
  26. Yeah, I usually go on vacations in Autumn (The Fall, or whatever you call it), but it's just me. I know a lot of folks that do it during the summer. As for the browser, I agree, it's waaay too old. What about the China fork 115, then? Don't remember the exact name.
    1 point
  27. "I made some Benchmarking for myself, I decided to share them, frankly I doubt there are still many who uses 391.35 drivers, but i believe it's the best Drivers for Pascal cards" D.Draker never advises bad drivers. https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/cbfls3/benchmarking_39135_vs_43136_drivers/
    1 point
  28. There are at least 3 active users that do it very fruequently.
    1 point
  29. With 3.8.2, some "WIN+" keyboard shortcuts are still broken. "WIN + SHIFT + NUM". E.g.: When similar windows are grouped as 1st app on the taskbar, holding "WIN" and then pressing "1" starts cycling through these windows FORWARD. Now DON'T release "WIN" but hold "Win + Shift", and pressing "1" should cycle through these windows BACKWARD. But with 3.8.2, "WIN + SHIFT + NUM" always launches a new instance of the app on that position, which should only be the case when users haven't initiated such cycling. "WIN + CTRL + NUM". Holding "Win + Ctrl" and pressing "Num", this combination should initiate a direct switching through the windows grouped on that position in MRU order (no pop-ups shown above the taskbar), but with 3.8.2, pressing it does the same as pressing only "WIN + NUM", which should only be true if there's only one window on that position. All these are working well with 3.7.11.
    1 point
  30. What do you mean by "first"? There was no any attack from D.Draker's side at all, he merely suggested to listen to the official source (author), instead of someone with no relation to the author's team. I don't use CentBrowser either, it doesn't mean that user can come here with only one purpose - to simply insinuate scandals. By the way. the below text doesn't look like it was written by a "professor", or whomever he always claims to be. Look at the total absence of commas, those long pauses he desperately tried to express with the questionable help of ".........". I'd never, not for once, used any kind of advice from a person like that.
    1 point
  31. 1 point
  32. @lll888, did you study the capitalisation of words?
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...