dAbReAkA Posted November 29, 2006 Posted November 29, 2006 i've never seen anyone get a higher score than 5.9 for any of the components.. that's the maximum?!
trayne20 Posted November 29, 2006 Posted November 29, 2006 Component Details Subscore Base score Processor AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+ 4.9 4.5 Memory (RAM) 1.00 GB 4.5 Graphics NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS (Microsoft Corporation - WDDM) 5.9 Gaming graphics 511 MB Total available graphics memory 5.8 Primary hard disk 2GB Free (29GB Total) 5.3 Windows Vista Ultimate
kartel Posted November 29, 2006 Posted November 29, 2006 i'm running on vista now so i'm not sure if my results would be so accurate..no clock - 324-181 - 44 fps AVGclocked at 420-216 - 50 fps AVGit has 256mb of memory, so i guess my memory is slower than the "usual" radeon 9600 Ya, it's better than mine.I really want a new video card but the local shops all are scammers and never have quality product.My options are x1300pro256mb or x1600pro 512mb from Future shop.I'm just waiting for the christmas sale or new years blowout.......... B) I would love a x800 or x850xt
jaws75 Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 i've never seen anyone get a higher score than 5.9 for any of the components.. that's the maximum?!This is a line from the Windows Vista Product Guide available hereEach test results in a capability score between 1 and 5.9 for the component. Since a PC’s performance is limited by the lowest performing component, the overall test result, or “base score,” for the PC is determined by the lowest of the five scores. So yes 5.9 is the max.
usasma Posted December 14, 2006 Posted December 14, 2006 The Vista team has reserved scores over 5.9 for future use - so there is a mechanism to raise it. But that'll have to wait on future SP's to achieve.
TravisO Posted December 14, 2006 Posted December 14, 2006 What bugs are you waiting on, specifically?I'm never one to believe a new OS is buggy or flawed at all, nor have I ever seen it proved to me, and this SteveX guy shares that opinion, but he's listed a few bugs that seem very easy to reproduce and affect semi normal operations.http://blog.stevex.net/index.php/2006/12/1...sta-is-buggy-2/Can anybody see if they can re-produce them?
amit_talkin Posted April 14, 2007 Author Posted April 14, 2007 Here is mine with Core 2 Duo ....CPU is overclocked to 3 Ghz...and RAM is @1076 Mhz..
DigeratiPrime Posted September 8, 2008 Posted September 8, 2008 I actually had 2 other computers since the one shown above and my current one Not much change really according to Vista:Yeah I grave dug, should have really posted in the other topic:http://www.msfn.org/board/what-s-your-comp...nce-t81987.htmlProbably should merge these all and sticky one.http://www.msfn.org/board/Vista-System-Rat...ore-t93850.html
Xstyle Posted September 8, 2008 Posted September 8, 2008 (edited) --wrong post i guess--- Edited September 8, 2008 by Xstyle
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now