Link21 Posted July 12, 2006 Share Posted July 12, 2006 Ohh no Link21 is here we are all going to get stupid ,just kidding!When you say that Windows 9x operating systems don't deserve to get longer support time in comparision to NT based systemsbecause they are worse.Why did then Microsoft stop support for Windows NT 4 and 3.5 if you say they are better than 9x?Windows 98 rulez =) and I'm sorry to say it but Windows NT 4 sucks even Windows 95 had USB support *g* .That is only because Windows NT 3.5 and 4 were released earlier than Windows 98/ME and because of customer demand. But anything Windows 2000 or above has enough customer demand in comparison to Windows NT 3.5 and 4 and it is an NT based OS. Windows ME and Windows 2000 were released around the same time, yet Windows 2000 is so much better so it deserves to be supported a lot longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now