Tomcat76 Posted May 28, 2006 Author Share Posted May 28, 2006 Because, as I said, it happens outside of HFSLIP as well. This is the entire code I ran in the "standalone" batch file:MD SOURCE2&XCOPY/DEQ SOURCE SOURCE2MD SPEX\i386&START/WAIT HF\w2ksp51.exe /Q /X:SPEX\START/WAIT SPEX\i386\update\update.exe -u -n -o -q -s:"%~dp0SOURCE\"PAUSE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dziubek Posted May 29, 2006 Share Posted May 29, 2006 http://download.macromedia.com/get/flashpl...r_9_ax_beta.exe slipstream Flash Player 9 *You must only unpack file install_flash_player_9_ax_beta.exe and overwrite these files with files from http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwa...ash/swflash.cabdziubek Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kramy Posted May 29, 2006 Share Posted May 29, 2006 (edited) Because, as I said, it happens outside of HFSLIP as well. This is the entire code I ran in the "standalone" batch file:MD SOURCE2&XCOPY/DEQ SOURCE SOURCE2MD SPEX\i386&START/WAIT HF\w2ksp51.exe /Q /X:SPEX\START/WAIT SPEX\i386\update\update.exe -u -n -o -q -s:"%~dp0SOURCE\"PAUSETry "MD SPEX\SP\I386" Oh, why must you torment me with your brutalizing against my love? You do not consider the fair USP5.x to be of quality equal to MS-SPx, but as I gaze upon her perfect hotfixes and dozens of core features, and then upon your poor bent, twisted, and warped slipstreaming code, I see more...far more, than you ever could. Oh let her frollick with the other SPs, in glory together within SOURCE-patching land! [/fdvinsanity]@ECHO OFFIF EXIST "SLIPSOURCE\" RD "SLIPSOURCE\" /S /QMD SLIPSOURCEXCOPY SOURCE SLIPSOURCE /D /E /QIF NOT EXIST "SPEX\SP\i386" MD SPEX\SP\i386SET SPNAME=FOR /F "TOKENS=1 DELIMS=" %%i in ('DIR /B HF\W2KSP5*.EXE') DO SET SPNAME=%%iREN HF\%SPNAME% W2KSP.EXESTART /WAIT HF\W2KSP.EXE /Q /X:SP\START /WAIT SP\i386\update\update.exe -u -n -o -q -s:"%~dp0SLIPSOURCE\"REN HF\W2KSP.EXE %SPNAME%RMDIR /S /Q SPPAUSE Edited May 29, 2006 by Kramy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted May 29, 2006 Author Share Posted May 29, 2006 Why does it require another dir level?BTW... You MD SPEX\SP but you extract the service pack into SP and the sliptreaming command uses the SP dir as a base without CD'ing into SPEX first.Anyway, I'll check it out. Maybe there's a problem with the folder name "SPEX". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kramy Posted May 29, 2006 Share Posted May 29, 2006 I guess Gurgelmeyer's USP doesn't require the dirs to be made first. Just remove the whole line - the files slipstream properly on my system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted May 29, 2006 Author Share Posted May 29, 2006 (edited) Heh... I think the problem lies elsewhere.Can you do me a favor and try this test release? Just run it and do the first portion of install to see if you get file copy errors.HFSLIP_60529a.7z Edited May 29, 2006 by Tomcat76 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted May 29, 2006 Author Share Posted May 29, 2006 Hahaha... You won't believe this... I tested a USP5-slipstreamed source with 60527b, which had the file copy errors. In 60527c, I fixed another problem related to USP5 and mentioned in the changelog something like "fixed problem with USP5; one more to go". Now I see that that fix actually fixed the main problem, hehe.I got side tracked in investigating this problem because, when you extract the USP5 executable, you can see there are roughly 414 files in that i386 folder which don't end up in the slipstreamed source. This is apparantly normal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiki Burgh Posted May 30, 2006 Share Posted May 30, 2006 (edited) hi sirs!i would just like to ask if these lines have in any way negative factor in SOURCESS?please know though that the final build is working great ... but these are just bits that caught my attention while watching the script do its thing ... i may not have caught everything though that shows 0 files copied ...WindowsXP-KB891070-x86-ENU.EXETEMP\SP2QFE\ntkrnlmp.exeTEMP\SP2QFE\ntkrnlpa.exeTEMP\SP2QFE\ntkrpamp.exeTEMP\SP2QFE\ntoskrnl.exe4 File(s) copied0 File(s) copiedWindowsXP-KB892056-x86-ENU.EXETEMP\SP2QFE\mshtml.dllTEMP\SP2QFE\urlmon.dll2 File(s) copied0 File(s) copiedWindowsXP-KB894179-x86-ENU.EXETEMP\SP2QFE\shdocvw.dll1 File(s) copied0 File(s) copiedWindowsXP-KB898461-x86-ENU.exe0 File(s) copiedWindowsXP-KB901190-x86-ENU.exe0 File(s) copiedTEMP\SP2GDR\LANG\imekr61.ime1 File(s) copied0 File(s) copiedWindowsXP-KB888432-x86-ENU.EXETEMP\SP2QFE\w32time.dll1 File(s) copied0 File(s) copiedWindowsXP-KB890923-x86-ENU.exeTEMP\SP2GDR\browseui.dllTEMP\SP2GDR\cdfview.dllTEMP\SP2GDR\iepeers.dllTEMP\SP2GDR\inseng.dllTEMP\SP2GDR\mshtml.dllTEMP\SP2GDR\msrating.dllTEMP\SP2GDR\shdocvw.dllTEMP\SP2GDR\shlwapi.dllTEMP\SP2GDR\urlmon.dllTEMP\SP2GDR\wininet.dll10 File(s) copied0 File(s) copiedWindowsXP-KB913808-x86-ENU.exe0 File(s) copiedwould it be quite safe to assume that newer files were already present in that is why nothing needs to be overwritten? or HFSLIP does not deal with these updates as all of these are not in our list of updates? btw, these are unofficial hotfixes WindowsXP-KB891070-x86-ENU.EXEPacket-writing programs for optical media recording devices run slower than expected on Windows XP Service Pack 2-based computersWindowsXP-KB892056-x86-ENU.EXEFIX: You may receive a "Page cannot be displayed" error message when you click a hyperlink to view a Microsoft Office document in Internet Explorer 6 Service Pack 1WindowsXP-KB894179-x86-ENU.EXEFIX: You may receive a "This operation has been canceled due to restrictions in effect on this computer" error message when you try to open the Internet Options dialog box in Internet Explorer 6WindowsXP-KB898461-x86-ENU.exeSoftware update 898461 installs a permanent copy of the Package Installer for Windows version 6.1.22.4WindowsXP-KB888432-x86-ENU.EXEA component that runs in the same process as the Windows Time service is stopped or is disabled unexpectedly in Windows XPWindowsXP-KB890923-x86-ENU.exeMS05-020: Cumulative security update for Internet ExplorerWindowsXP-KB913808-x86-ENU.exeThe embedded resource version of the LIP MUI files is incorrect in Windows XP Starter Editioni know i do not need some of these & i am about to remove them from HF directory i just like to know how these are treated ...thanks! Edited May 30, 2006 by Kiki Burgh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted May 30, 2006 Author Share Posted May 30, 2006 HFSLIP deletes "junk" files, and sometimes hotfixes are given special treatment. In these cases it's possible that no additional files are left to be copied over after a hotfix has been processed completely. So it's normal. I can only get rid of the "0 files copied" message by disabling all copy output, but I think most people would prefer to see the names of the binaries that are processed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiki Burgh Posted May 30, 2006 Share Posted May 30, 2006 thanks for the clarification ... i would too Tomcat ...... prefer to see the names of the binaries that are processed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiki Burgh Posted May 30, 2006 Share Posted May 30, 2006 hi again!may i ask too why this particular part (the lines i italicized) seems to change every now & then?Creating ISO...Warning: creating filesystem that does not conform to ISO-9660.Warning: creating filesystem with (nonstandard) Joliet extensions but without (standard) Rock Ridge extensions. It is highly recommended to add Rock RidgeUsing MSCON000.CP_ for SOURCESS/I386/MSCONFIGx.cp_ (MSCONFIG.cp_)Using SCANS000.EXE for SOURCESS/VALUEADD/MSFT/USMT/SCANSTATE_A.EXE (SCANSTATE.EXE)Size of boot image is 4 sectors -> No emulation 1.31% done, estimate finish Sat May 20 08:43:50 2006 2.63% done, estimate finish Sat May 20 08:45:44 2006 3.94% done, estimate finish Sat May 20 08:48:29 2006Creating ISO...Warning: creating filesystem that does not conform to ISO-9660.Warning: creating filesystem with (nonstandard) Joliet extensions but without (standard) Rock Ridge extensions. It is highly recommended to add Rock RidgeUsing WAVPA000.AX_ for SOURCESS/I386/WavPackDSSplitter.ax_ (WavPackDSDecoder.ax_)Using QUICK000.QT_ for SOURCESS/I386/QuickTimeInternetExtras.qt_ (QuickTimeEssentials.qt_)Using QUICK001.QT_ for SOURCESS/I386/QuickTimeEssentials.qt_ (QuickTime.qt_)Using MSCON000.CP_ for SOURCESS/I386/MSCONFIGx.cp_ (MSCONFIG.cp_)Using DIVX_000.DL_ for SOURCESS/I386/divx_xx0c.dl_ (divx_xx07.dl_)Using SCANS000.EXE for SOURCESS/VALUEADD/MSFT/USMT/SCANSTATE_A.EXE (SCANSTATE.EXE)Size of boot image is 4 sectors -> No emulation 1.30% done, estimate finish Sat May 20 10:53:16 2006 2.60% done, estimate finish Sat May 20 10:55:11 2006 3.89% done, estimate finish Sat May 20 10:57:07 2006thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted May 31, 2006 Author Share Posted May 31, 2006 I can't tell you much about mkisofs. It's renaming files but the question is whether it updates the TOC so any requests for "MSCONFIGx.cp_" (by Windows setup) are redirected to "MSCON000.CP_".Do all those programs install properly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiki Burgh Posted May 31, 2006 Share Posted May 31, 2006 it would seem that the programs install correctly ... the only thing i noticed based on the 2 examples above is that this particular part of the process changes almost everytime i create new builds ... but it's okay ... was just curious ...thanks again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted June 3, 2006 Author Share Posted June 3, 2006 An attempt at .NET 2.0 installation at T-13. It's working on Windows 2000 with RVM's silent installer. I still didn't test it with other Windows versions.Please read the foot note in the main post.Windows XP and Windows 2003 users should just place Aserone's silent installer in the HFSVCPACK folder but I didn't want to exclude these OS's from being able to use installers that don't contain the T-13 fix. The choice is yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted June 4, 2006 Author Share Posted June 4, 2006 Apparantly there are still problems on WinXP/2K3. So here's 60603b...I'll test it myself tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now