laurens Posted September 23, 2005 Posted September 23, 2005 Does XPize take effect at the systemspeed? make XPize it faster/slower?
glent Posted September 23, 2005 Posted September 23, 2005 it should have no affect in system speed or stability
Aaron_ Posted September 23, 2005 Posted September 23, 2005 It just replace resources, system speed should not be affected.
XPero Posted September 23, 2005 Posted September 23, 2005 There is no performance decrease because XPize does not run in the background. It just replace resources, kinda "install and forget".
Martijn Posted September 23, 2005 Posted September 23, 2005 (edited) Maybe read the FAQ on the XPize website?Edit: never mind.... Edited September 23, 2005 by Martijn
gertjanvd Posted December 29, 2005 Posted December 29, 2005 Is it possible to add an option that removes unneeded resources like 128x128, 48x48 icons etc.Ofcourse the sizes aren't the same for everyone (some people like having big icons on their desktop), so with some checkboxes you can select which icons to remove and maybe also remove the 16 colors icons, 256 color icons, etc... or is XPize already doing this?And by removing resources you decrease the file size of the system, which results is less memory usage and so actually speeding up the system? I don't know how many icons XPize replaces .Is this true? Or does windows dynamicly loads the usefull resources in memory instead of all of them? Can someone tell me if this is going to make a difference?
alsiladka Posted December 30, 2005 Posted December 30, 2005 my guess is that 128 x 128 requirs a little more memory. but using the lite pack wont affect the speed. @xpero is the option to select only the icon size which you want?
Nakatomi2010 Posted December 30, 2005 Posted December 30, 2005 Either XPize or something I've been doing actually seems to speed the system I build right up...Though that may be because I'm disabling "Automatically Search for sahred resources" by default....
BoardBabe Posted January 2, 2006 Posted January 2, 2006 If you choose to install TaskSwitchXP this will use some system resources, as it runs as a task in the background.
Kelsenellenelvian Posted January 3, 2006 Posted January 3, 2006 Yeah less than a meg of RAM used by taskswithXP.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now