To include or not?

[Kelsenellenelvian]

http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=49320

A fully functional registry tweaks library app.

Should it be included in the next release?

Edited July 11, 2005 by kelsenellenelvian

[glent]

No these are two very different applications, i dont see the point in increasing the download size when many of us already use the apps or know of its excitense

Just my 2 cents

[Lost Soul]

naa i think just a reference to it should be fine

Edited July 11, 2005 by Lost Soul

[oneless]

@kelsenellenelvian

WPI must be a flexibile structure . this mean options .

if i want sound , is good if i have it .

i dont want sound is bad if i cant disable it.

the point is that after 8 months ,

WPI is enough for me , and in the same time maybe

i need changes , maybe i need few options , something new, i dont know...

of course every thing must evolve in one way or other

but , all or 99% of our request must be options for the others .

about your question : no , if i want it i include it .

this is the beauty part of this nice piece of art called WPI .

[Bâshrat the Sneaky]

Also a "negative" from my side. I agree with the others: if I would want it, I could simply include it myself. For the most of us it would just be something unused, that increases the download size.

[Kelsenellenelvian]

Point taken guys.

[Doc Symbiosis]

Just can accompany to the previous speakers. To integrate this, should be left to the user of WPI.