Bilou_Gateux Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 @Incroyable HULKTypo error on last Windows 2000/XP Hotfixes. Correct:KB873339 = MS04-043: Vulnerability in HyperTerminal could allow code executionWhat we actually can read:Vulnerabilities in Windows Kernel and LSASS could allow elevation of privilegeErreur de Copier-Coller
Incroyable HULK Posted December 15, 2004 Author Posted December 15, 2004 @ Bilou_Gateuxc'est fait!it's done!
peachy Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 Okay, I must of missed something here. I used the /integrate switch on 3 of the 5 hotfixes last night but Windows Update says I need them installed. Which would indidcate they didn't get installed. I noticed on the first page of the thread a line about using svcpack.inf to run the hotfixes. So, what syntax other than /Q /N /Z would I use? If I follow the method for post SP1 hotfixes I would specify the path to the actual hotfix file. But, logically, if I integrated the hotfixes, why would I need to specify them in the svcpack.inf file, too. Microsoft's website documentation is not too clear on this point. Can someone post what their svcpack.inf now looks like if they use the /integrate switch?
Astalavista Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 My god i just got a update warning.kb885836kb885835kb873339kb886185kb885626that many in one day??? here we go
Incroyable HULK Posted December 15, 2004 Author Posted December 15, 2004 @peachy[CatalogHeader][Version]BuildNumber=2600MinorVersion=1MajorVersion=5Signature="$WINDOWS NT$"[SetupData]CatalogSubDir="\I386\svcpack"[SetupHotfixesToRun]KB886185.exe /q /n /zKB885836.exe /q /n /zKB885835.exe /q /n /zKB873339.exe /q /n /zKB885626.exe /q /n /zKB834707.exe /q /n /z[ProductCatalogsToInstall]KB886185.catKB885836.catKB885835.catKB873339.catKB885626.catKB834707.cat
peachy Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 Thanks, Incroyable HULK. That's what I figured it should look like. However, does this mean I still have to have the hotfix files in the path specified in CatalogSubDir or just the .cat files?
peachy Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 Anyone know where to download KB887797?http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...&DisplayLang=en
peachy Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 Okay, I see what it did. It created a svcpack directory with the .cat files and renamed all the hotfix files. But that should be in the one I did yesterday but the hotfixes didn't integrate. I am trying it again right now.
raduking Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 Have U noticed that the knowledge base article for this update is not available ?http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...&DisplayLang=en
peachy Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 (edited) Okay, it worked this time! The only difference was that I added qchain and update.exe to the directory, but didn't specify them in the svcpack.inf file. This is a nicer way of slipstreaming hotfixes! ---------------Okay, I double checked the directory structure for my unattended build from last night and the the run history of the Start Menu. The reason it didn't work the first time was that I specified the wrong target directory for the /integrate switch so that the directory structure was incorrect for the burned CD. Oops. Edited December 16, 2004 by peachy
mythosaz Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 KB889293 -› Cumulative Security Update for Internet ExplorerDownload -› 2.9 MB (December 1, 2004)Switches: KB889293.exe /passive /norestart /quietShouldn't this be either /passive or /quiet?Unattended installs should probably also include /n (unless you plan on a rollback to the middle of your unattended setup )
RyanVM Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 Have U noticed that the knowledge base article for this update is not available ?http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...&DisplayLang=enYes I did. There's a lag in that sometimes.
mythosaz Posted December 16, 2004 Posted December 16, 2004 Another point about KB889293 -- if you're building a stock corporate build, you might instead need KB889669 to match your 2800.1106 IE.My results showed a 889293 in Add/Remove and in Hotfix /L, but IE failed to show it and V5 windowsupdate still suggested I download it.Anyway, if you're rolling 2800.1106, use the KB889669 replacement.
tkd90 Posted December 16, 2004 Posted December 16, 2004 I'm running windows 2000 professional and wanted to know if 823353 is replaced by 887797, and if I should install 889293 or 889669 seeing IE6 SP1 has a version of 6.0.2800.1106.These are the hotfixes I will be installing 832483329115823182823559826232828741833989835732837001840315840987841356873339885835885836889293 or 889669 ?887797 replaces 823353 ?819639832353Script 5.6 v5.6.0.8825There is some missing because I can use easy work arounds for them, like blocking ports or disalbing services etc.Also is it necessary to install MSXML 4.0 SP2 and MDAC 2.8 ? seeing windows 2000 comes with MDAC 2.5 and IE6 SP1 has MSXML 3.0.
Recommended Posts