Kmuland Posted Wednesday at 02:27 PM Posted Wednesday at 02:27 PM Anyone know a way to set timer resolution in XP using a registry key or similar? Currently I use a timer program that needs to be open/active to maintain the desired time, but I was looking for a permanent timer change.
ED_Sln Posted Thursday at 08:01 AM Posted Thursday at 08:01 AM If it were possible to fix it in the registry, they would have done so instead of creating a program. No, in XP, you cannot set a timer without third-party programs.
Kmuland Posted Thursday at 10:22 AM Author Posted Thursday at 10:22 AM 2 hours ago, ED_Sln said: If it were possible to fix it in the registry, they would have done so instead of creating a program. No, in XP, you cannot set a timer without third-party programs. You are true. Lets talk about some of these tools working on XP to set the timer resolution. Currently Im using this one https://timerresolution.net/#download anymore? (better without .Net requirements)
ED_Sln Posted Thursday at 11:49 AM Posted Thursday at 11:49 AM (edited) I use this: https://yadi.sk/d/KpTGDPITsNWn7w the program itself is in the Timer_Fix folder. Brief description: Timer_Fix program with source code written in Visual Studio 6.0. The program has no interface; after launch, it will set the system timer to a period of 1 ms and leave it unchanged. The program will remain in the processes until the OS is rebooted. For convenience, it is best to place this program in “Startup” and completely forget about the problem of time passing. No issues have been found with using this method. Edited Thursday at 11:51 AM by ED_Sln 1
Kmuland Posted Thursday at 02:56 PM Author Posted Thursday at 02:56 PM (edited) Million thanks!!! It was the program that I was looking for. Just a little tool to load at startup without interface!. Thanks for sharing pal!! It will run by default in all my XP machines since now Edited Thursday at 02:57 PM by Kmuland
NotHereToPlayGames Posted Thursday at 04:59 PM Posted Thursday at 04:59 PM I'm not seeing the "advantage". What am I missing? Before/After comparison?
Kmuland Posted Thursday at 05:30 PM Author Posted Thursday at 05:30 PM you cannot "see". Its a feeling. Its similar to CRT times and setting monitor from 60hz to higher refresh rate. Some people didnt notice nothing.... other felt the screen more pleasant in that way
ED_Sln Posted yesterday at 05:04 AM Posted yesterday at 05:04 AM (edited) 12 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: I'm not seeing the "advantage". What am I missing? Before/After comparison? This manifests itself in the fact that the time on the computer starts to rush. This occurs when working with relatively new versions of Chrome-based browsers, such as 360, Chromium 87, and Supermium. They constantly switch the timer mode from 1 to 16 ms, which causes the time to run ahead. This program switches the timer to continuous operation in 1 ms mode, so the time is correct. Edited yesterday at 05:05 AM by ED_Sln 1
Kmuland Posted 11 hours ago Author Posted 11 hours ago (edited) On 10/3/2025 at 8:04 AM, ED_Sln said: This program switches the timer to continuous operation in 1 ms mode, so the time is correct. Could be posible lower the timer with this tool? some command line to enter the desired timer? I wanted to test below 1ms Edited 11 hours ago by Kmuland
ED_Sln Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 1 hour ago, Kmuland said: Could be posible lower the timer with this tool? some command line to enter the desired timer? I wanted to test below 1ms No, you cannot set a different value. As far as I know, these values are hard-coded into the OS kernel, and you cannot set a value lower than 1 ms.
Damnation Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago (edited) Is this the same issue that the XP HAL timer patch addresses? Edited 7 hours ago by Damnation
ED_Sln Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 4 hours ago, Damnation said: Is this the same issue that the XP HAL timer patch addresses? I'm not sure if that's it. It mentions an ACPI timer, but this thread is about HPET, which doesn't depend on the processor frequency and is measured in milliseconds rather than megahertz.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now