Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Interesting work,I had never read it.
Consider, however, that theoretically Shors' algorithm:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shor's_algorithm

might be able,using a Quantum Computer (such as Google's) to break the 25519 elliptic key implemented in TLS 1.3:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curve25519

Although my personal motivation related to confidentiality seems excessive,in my browser I use a Post Quantum Secure Key.

 

It is also possible to verify the key used at the BrowserLeaks website.
But an easier test is also available.

Edited by Sampei.Nihira

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 1/20/2024 at 2:59 PM, Sampei.Nihira said:

might be able,using a Quantum Computer (such as Google's) to break the 25519 elliptic key implemented in TLS 1.3:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curve25519

Although my personal motivation related to confidentiality seems excessive,in my browser I use a Post Quantum Secure Key.

 

It is also possible to verify the key used at the BrowserLeaks website.
But an easier test is also available.

Quite some time already passed, so it would've been known, yet to this date, the developers declare - it still didn't happen. Will it, ever? We don't know.

"Contrary to popular belief, AES-128 is not broken in practice by quantum computers"

https://blog.cloudflare.com/post-quantum-to-origins/

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Update notification! update.gif

As already reported , the Root Certificates have been updated and are now from 27-02-2024. Here are screenshots of both updaters:

Root-Certificates-27-02-2024-2.png

Root-Certificates-27-02-2024.png

Therefore, my self-created, offline Root Certificate Updaters in the section 11.2.4. Downloads related to Root Certificate Updates (in the first post of this thread) will also be updated as soon as possible. ssuper5sur5.gif

Cheers, AstroSkipper matrix.gif

Edited by AstroSkipper
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 3/1/2024 at 5:06 PM, AstroSkipper said:

Update notification! update.gif

As already reported , the Root Certificates have been updated and are now from 27-02-2024. Here are screenshots of both updaters:

Root-Certificates-27-02-2024-2.png

Root-Certificates-27-02-2024.png

Therefore, my self-created, offline Root Certificate Updaters in the section 11.2.4. Downloads related to Root Certificate Updates (in the first post of this thread) will also be updated as soon as possible. ssuper5sur5.gif

Cheers, AstroSkipper matrix.gif

FYI, due to the fact that the MSFN forum editor is totally broken and hasn't been working properly for months, especially when it comes to inserting of links :realmad:, I wasn't able to edit my main article ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use the last weeks. Unfortunately, I have to revise and to change some content in this article to be hopefully able again to edit it and to add the links for the new offline Root Certificate Updaters. This all is very annoying and time-consuming. :realmad:

Edited by AstroSkipper
Posted

Update notification! update.gif

As already reported , the Root Certificates have been updated and are now from 26-03-2024. Here are screenshots of both updaters:

Root-Certificates-26-03-2024.png

Root-Certificates-26-03-2024-2.png

Therefore, my self-created, offline Root Certificate Updaters in the section 11.2.4. Downloads related to Root Certificate Updates (in the first post of this thread) will also be updated if I can somehow trick this crappy forum post editor. tetecontremur.gif

Cheers, AstroSkipper matrix.gif

Posted
On 3/28/2024 at 10:31 PM, AstroSkipper said:

FYI, due to the fact that the MSFN forum editor is totally broken and hasn't been working properly for months, especially when it comes to inserting of links :realmad:, I wasn't able to edit my main article ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use the last weeks. Unfortunately, I have to revise and to change some content in this article to be hopefully able again to edit it and to add the links for the new offline Root Certificate Updaters. This all is very annoying and time-consuming. :realmad:

After a long and time-consuming editing and fixing of my main article in the form of trial and error, I have been able yet to trick this crappy forum post editor. tetecontremur.gif Once again, many thanks to the causer of the forum post editor breakage and for still not fixing it after a couple of months now! :realmad: Anyway! I will update my self-created, offline Root Certificate Updaters in the section 11.2.4. Downloads related to Root Certificate Updates (in the first post of this thread) as soon as possible.

Cheers, AstroSkipper matrix.gif

Posted
On 4/2/2024 at 12:29 AM, AstroSkipper said:

After a long and time-consuming editing and fixing of my main article in the form of trial and error, I have been able yet to trick this crappy forum post editor. tetecontremur.gif Once again, many thanks to the causer of the forum post editor breakage and for still not fixing it after a couple of months now! :realmad: Anyway! I will update my self-created, offline Root Certificate Updaters in the section 11.2.4. Downloads related to Root Certificate Updates (in the first post of this thread) as soon as possible.

Cheers, AstroSkipper matrix.gif

I have updated my self-created, offline Root Certificate Updaters in the section 11.2.4. Downloads related to Root Certificate Updates (in the first post of this thread). I have created the offline Root Certificate Updaters both from 27.02.2024 and the current ones from 26.03.2024 and added the links to my article.

Cheers, AstroSkipper matrix.gif

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Is there a version of ProxHTTPSProxy that supports http/2 + TLS 1.3? 
Some servers don't work with http/1.1 anymore, such as discord.

 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Anbima said:

If I install ProxHTTSProxy or HTTPSProxy, will the page https://valid-isrgrootx2.letsencrypt.org/ be transmitted encrypted with 360Chrome 13.5.1030?

As I don't use 360Chrome 13.5.1030, I can't judge what your problem is. nimportequoi.gif And only one sentence without a concrete description of your issue is simply too little information. smilie_denk_24.gif BTW, the installation of ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu TLS 1.3 3V3 can be done in minutes. So, just try it! :P

Edited by AstroSkipper
correction
Posted (edited)

We have written about this in the following thread:
https://msfn.org/board/topic/175170-root-certificates-and-revoked-certificates-for-windows-xp/page/42/

Which file do I have to use if I want to install ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu TLS 1.3 3V3?
You have listed so many. Is this “portable” or is it “installed?

Is the whole “menu” required here, or can it also be installed “small”?
If so, what do I need for this?

Edited by Anbima
Posted (edited)
51 minutes ago, Anbima said:

Which file do I have to use if I want to install ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu TLS 1.3 3V3?
You have listed so many. Is this “portable” or is it “installed?

My main article even offers a Table of Contents at the begining of the first post. In your case, read from the section 9. to 9.3.3! Following the table of contents, the download can be found in the section 11.2.2.. The download package contains a short and a detailed documentation. What else is supposed to be needed? I think nothing. :P
To answer your question whether it is installed or portable, it is more portable than installed. To be more detailed, you have to install a certificate and some registry settings to let the ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu TLS 1.3 3V3 run correctly. All has been sufficiently described. But nothing of it is harmful and can easily be removed if necessary. And that's all I'm going to say about it. Read first, then try it out and only if something doesn't work, I'll be happy to help. However, one thing should be clear, I am not a fan of spoon-feeding
bebe23.gif

Edited by AstroSkipper
Update of content
Posted (edited)

It's working now, thank you.

What do I have to install/integrate as a minimum for it to run in the background?
I don't necessarily need the menu.

 

Edited by Anbima
Posted
34 minutes ago, Anbima said:

Error is no longer there.
What setting do I have to make in 360Chrom so that the proxy is used?

 

In Chrome, there should be a setting to use the system proxy which has to be enabled. When starting ProxHTTPSProxy via the PopMenu, my self-created starter programme StartProxy automatically sets the necessary configuration in the system proxy of Windows XP.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...