Sampei.Nihira Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 (edited) Interesting work,I had never read it. Consider, however, that theoretically Shors' algorithm: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shor's_algorithm might be able,using a Quantum Computer (such as Google's) to break the 25519 elliptic key implemented in TLS 1.3: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curve25519 Although my personal motivation related to confidentiality seems excessive,in my browser I use a Post Quantum Secure Key. It is also possible to verify the key used at the BrowserLeaks website. But an easier test is also available. Edited January 20 by Sampei.Nihira 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstroSkipper Posted January 20 Author Share Posted January 20 7 hours ago, Sampei.Nihira said: Interesting work,I had never read it. Thanks for reading! 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.Draker Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 On 1/20/2024 at 2:59 PM, Sampei.Nihira said: might be able,using a Quantum Computer (such as Google's) to break the 25519 elliptic key implemented in TLS 1.3: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curve25519 Although my personal motivation related to confidentiality seems excessive,in my browser I use a Post Quantum Secure Key. It is also possible to verify the key used at the BrowserLeaks website. But an easier test is also available. Quite some time already passed, so it would've been known, yet to this date, the developers declare - it still didn't happen. Will it, ever? We don't know. "Contrary to popular belief, AES-128 is not broken in practice by quantum computers" https://blog.cloudflare.com/post-quantum-to-origins/ 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstroSkipper Posted March 1 Author Share Posted March 1 (edited) Update notification! As already reported , the Root Certificates have been updated and are now from 27-02-2024. Here are screenshots of both updaters: Therefore, my self-created, offline Root Certificate Updaters in the section 11.2.4. Downloads related to Root Certificate Updates (in the first post of this thread) will also be updated as soon as possible. Cheers, AstroSkipper Edited March 1 by AstroSkipper 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstroSkipper Posted March 28 Author Share Posted March 28 (edited) On 3/1/2024 at 5:06 PM, AstroSkipper said: Update notification! As already reported , the Root Certificates have been updated and are now from 27-02-2024. Here are screenshots of both updaters: Therefore, my self-created, offline Root Certificate Updaters in the section 11.2.4. Downloads related to Root Certificate Updates (in the first post of this thread) will also be updated as soon as possible. Cheers, AstroSkipper FYI, due to the fact that the MSFN forum editor is totally broken and hasn't been working properly for months, especially when it comes to inserting of links , I wasn't able to edit my main article ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use the last weeks. Unfortunately, I have to revise and to change some content in this article to be hopefully able again to edit it and to add the links for the new offline Root Certificate Updaters. This all is very annoying and time-consuming. Edited March 28 by AstroSkipper 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstroSkipper Posted March 28 Author Share Posted March 28 Update notification! As already reported , the Root Certificates have been updated and are now from 26-03-2024. Here are screenshots of both updaters: Therefore, my self-created, offline Root Certificate Updaters in the section 11.2.4. Downloads related to Root Certificate Updates (in the first post of this thread) will also be updated if I can somehow trick this crappy forum post editor. Cheers, AstroSkipper 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstroSkipper Posted April 2 Author Share Posted April 2 On 3/28/2024 at 10:31 PM, AstroSkipper said: FYI, due to the fact that the MSFN forum editor is totally broken and hasn't been working properly for months, especially when it comes to inserting of links , I wasn't able to edit my main article ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use the last weeks. Unfortunately, I have to revise and to change some content in this article to be hopefully able again to edit it and to add the links for the new offline Root Certificate Updaters. This all is very annoying and time-consuming. After a long and time-consuming editing and fixing of my main article in the form of trial and error, I have been able yet to trick this crappy forum post editor. Once again, many thanks to the causer of the forum post editor breakage and for still not fixing it after a couple of months now! Anyway! I will update my self-created, offline Root Certificate Updaters in the section 11.2.4. Downloads related to Root Certificate Updates (in the first post of this thread) as soon as possible. Cheers, AstroSkipper 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstroSkipper Posted April 4 Author Share Posted April 4 On 4/2/2024 at 12:29 AM, AstroSkipper said: After a long and time-consuming editing and fixing of my main article in the form of trial and error, I have been able yet to trick this crappy forum post editor. Once again, many thanks to the causer of the forum post editor breakage and for still not fixing it after a couple of months now! Anyway! I will update my self-created, offline Root Certificate Updaters in the section 11.2.4. Downloads related to Root Certificate Updates (in the first post of this thread) as soon as possible. Cheers, AstroSkipper I have updated my self-created, offline Root Certificate Updaters in the section 11.2.4. Downloads related to Root Certificate Updates (in the first post of this thread). I have created the offline Root Certificate Updaters both from 27.02.2024 and the current ones from 26.03.2024 and added the links to my article. Cheers, AstroSkipper 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FarmerNFS Posted April 22 Share Posted April 22 Is there a version of ProxHTTPSProxy that supports http/2 + TLS 1.3? Some servers don't work with http/1.1 anymore, such as discord. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anbima Posted Friday at 12:34 PM Share Posted Friday at 12:34 PM If I install ProxHTTSProxy or HTTPSProxy, will the page https://valid-isrgrootx2.letsencrypt.org/ be transmitted encrypted with 360Chrome 13.5.1030? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstroSkipper Posted Friday at 01:31 PM Author Share Posted Friday at 01:31 PM (edited) 1 hour ago, Anbima said: If I install ProxHTTSProxy or HTTPSProxy, will the page https://valid-isrgrootx2.letsencrypt.org/ be transmitted encrypted with 360Chrome 13.5.1030? As I don't use 360Chrome 13.5.1030, I can't judge what your problem is. And only one sentence without a concrete description of your issue is simply too little information. BTW, the installation of ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu TLS 1.3 3V3 can be done in minutes. So, just try it! Edited Friday at 01:35 PM by AstroSkipper correction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anbima Posted Friday at 01:39 PM Share Posted Friday at 01:39 PM (edited) We have written about this in the following thread: https://msfn.org/board/topic/175170-root-certificates-and-revoked-certificates-for-windows-xp/page/42/ Which file do I have to use if I want to install ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu TLS 1.3 3V3? You have listed so many. Is this “portable” or is it “installed? Is the whole “menu” required here, or can it also be installed “small”? If so, what do I need for this? Edited Friday at 01:40 PM by Anbima Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstroSkipper Posted Friday at 01:55 PM Author Share Posted Friday at 01:55 PM (edited) 51 minutes ago, Anbima said: Which file do I have to use if I want to install ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu TLS 1.3 3V3? You have listed so many. Is this “portable” or is it “installed? My main article even offers a Table of Contents at the begining of the first post. In your case, read from the section 9. to 9.3.3! Following the table of contents, the download can be found in the section 11.2.2.. The download package contains a short and a detailed documentation. What else is supposed to be needed? I think nothing. To answer your question whether it is installed or portable, it is more portable than installed. To be more detailed, you have to install a certificate and some registry settings to let the ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu TLS 1.3 3V3 run correctly. All has been sufficiently described. But nothing of it is harmful and can easily be removed if necessary. And that's all I'm going to say about it. Read first, then try it out and only if something doesn't work, I'll be happy to help. However, one thing should be clear, I am not a fan of spoon-feeding. Edited Friday at 02:31 PM by AstroSkipper Update of content 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anbima Posted Friday at 06:24 PM Share Posted Friday at 06:24 PM (edited) It's working now, thank you. What do I have to install/integrate as a minimum for it to run in the background? I don't necessarily need the menu. Edited Friday at 07:04 PM by Anbima Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstroSkipper Posted Friday at 07:09 PM Author Share Posted Friday at 07:09 PM 34 minutes ago, Anbima said: Error is no longer there. What setting do I have to make in 360Chrom so that the proxy is used? In Chrome, there should be a setting to use the system proxy which has to be enabled. When starting ProxHTTPSProxy via the PopMenu, my self-created starter programme StartProxy automatically sets the necessary configuration in the system proxy of Windows XP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now