MSwin98forever Posted October 30, 2021 Posted October 30, 2021 (edited) . Edited February 22, 2022 by MSwin98forever
schwups Posted October 30, 2021 Author Posted October 30, 2021 The registry entries of LZDLL.reg must definitely be removed . API-MS-Win.reg entries shouldn't harm your system.
MSwin98forever Posted October 30, 2021 Posted October 30, 2021 (edited) . Edited February 22, 2022 by MSwin98forever
schwups Posted October 30, 2021 Author Posted October 30, 2021 1 hour ago, MSwin98forever said: Hmm.. I reinstall KernelEx and copy this files without 3party installer, and errors are same, and now error is "mscvr120.dll requires new windows", what a heck is this? I haven't tested the files from sendfile.su/1624653. Files may be corrupted. I always used the original files from sourceforge.net and topics KernelEx 4.5 Core Updates (4.5.2016.17) and Kext: DIY KernelEx extensions.
Goodmaneuver Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 If you are using the uploaded Core.ini then the contents= line under {BASE} is wrong it should be one line and be std,kexbasen,kexbases,kstub823 You also should have Kstub823.ini in the KernelEx folder along with Kstub823.dll. The upload ini file is not named correctly.
schwups Posted October 31, 2021 Author Posted October 31, 2021 Yes, it is important to always use the same name for Kstub823 - Kstub823 or Kexstubs or stubs - and not different names, that doesn't work. But std,kexbasen,kexbases,kstub823 or contents=Kstub823,std,kexbasen,kexbases does not matter in this case. There is no need to overwrite any definitions. I said MSwin98forever contents=Kstub823,std,kexbasen,kexbases before. This is the order I use.
Goodmaneuver Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 Yes it can be swapped around a little but not std last from my memory of such but that is not the main issue. The issue is that the uploaded Core.ini has kstub823 and kstub824 in its contents and 2 kstubs at once does not work.
schwups Posted October 31, 2021 Author Posted October 31, 2021 (edited) [BASE] contents=std,kexbasen,kexbases Kstub824 desc=Base enhancements (api fixes + extensions) That is the unmodified text of the original core.ini file. I never deleted Kstub824 from the next line. It has no function here. I think it is a placeholder or something to switch easy between 823 and the not released version 824 for jumper or simply a remnant. Edited October 31, 2021 by schwups
MSwin98forever Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 (edited) . Edited February 22, 2022 by MSwin98forever
schwups Posted October 31, 2021 Author Posted October 31, 2021 (edited) Install 4.5.2. You see the KernelEx files in the KernelEx folder. CORE.INI KernelEx.dll kexbasen.dll kexbases.dll kexCOM.dll License.txt msimg32.dll pdh.dll psapi.dll Release Notes.txt sheet.dll Uninstall.exe userenv.dll uxtheme.dll verify.exe VKrnlEx.vxd wtsapi32.dll I hope I catched them all. Back it up (copy the folder). Then test functionalty with e.g. Opera 11.64 (Win2000SP4 mode). Only when that works go the next step: Replace the eight named KernelEx files: https://msfn.org/board/topic/181424-firefox-24-52-for-me-and-98/?do=findComment&comment=1181947 Please use these files. I recommend to replace psapi and uxtheme, too. But these aren't required to run Firefox 31. Then test with improved Firefox 31.8 (XPSP2 mode). Only when that works go the next step and add Kext. Edited October 31, 2021 by schwups
MSwin98forever Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 (edited) . Edited February 22, 2022 by MSwin98forever
schwups Posted October 31, 2021 Author Posted October 31, 2021 Sorry, make sure that KernelEx 4.5.2 (2011-11-14) works!!!
MSwin98forever Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 (edited) . Edited February 22, 2022 by MSwin98forever
schwups Posted October 31, 2021 Author Posted October 31, 2021 Hmm, 4.5.2 already supports IsProcessorFeaturePresent. Opera should even start with KernelEx default mode! 2kSP4 avoids some issues. What happens, if you rename this profile folder? Try to run Firefox 9.0.1. Check, if there are running strange processes in the background. I suppose you have sufficient resources.
MSwin98forever Posted October 31, 2021 Posted October 31, 2021 (edited) . Edited February 22, 2022 by MSwin98forever
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now