Dibya Posted December 23, 2017 Share Posted December 23, 2017 3 minutes ago, Dennnn said: I try 32bit noSSE palemoon on Athlon XP /Windows 7. It is so slow, no, it is very very very slow. I can wait for 1 minute before this board has been loaded, and i'm unable to scroll it, it freezes. basilisk/moebius not start at all. Can you make 26.5.0 build with no-sse and Lav codecs support ? Current 26 work ok, but there is no lav codec support out of the box, so no way to browse youtube. Won't you think 7 is too new for that pc . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennnn Posted December 23, 2017 Share Posted December 23, 2017 Why not ? Palemoon 26 work fast, 720/30p video on 1080p monitor is smooth on CPU only via lav codecs/MPC. I have 2gb of Ram, 1gb always free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roytam1 Posted December 23, 2017 Author Share Posted December 23, 2017 32 minutes ago, Dennnn said: Why not ? Palemoon 26 work fast, 720/30p video on 1080p monitor is smooth on CPU only via lav codecs/MPC. I have 2gb of Ram, 1gb always free. Why not trying K-Meleon? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennnn Posted December 23, 2017 Share Posted December 23, 2017 Is there any version with LAV codecs ? Why 27 so slow, compared to 26 ? More than 20-100x slower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roytam1 Posted December 23, 2017 Author Share Posted December 23, 2017 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Dennnn said: Is there any version with LAV codecs ? Why 27 so slow, compared to 26 ? More than 20-100x slower. because 26 is Gecko24 based while 27 is Gecko38 based. for LAV dlls, please see FAQ. Edited December 23, 2017 by roytam1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennnn Posted December 23, 2017 Share Posted December 23, 2017 May be you can add Lav to 26 ? It is more actual for old machines that 27. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roytam1 Posted December 23, 2017 Author Share Posted December 23, 2017 (edited) On 12/23/2017 at 11:11 PM, Dennnn said: May be you can add Lav to 26 ? It is more actual for old machines that 27. not possible. Goanna2(i.e. Gecko24) has no infrastructure to ffmpeg libraries. EDIT: It could be possible, just very hard. MSE, fmp4 and libstagefright has to be backported to get it working, but infrastructure has big differences. Edited December 26, 2017 by roytam1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennnn Posted December 23, 2017 Share Posted December 23, 2017 So there is no K-Meleon with LAV codecs ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roytam1 Posted December 23, 2017 Author Share Posted December 23, 2017 22 minutes ago, Dennnn said: So there is no K-Meleon with LAV codecs ? You can use my build of K-Meleon with LAV codecs! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennnn Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 I try your build of K-Meleon, it is slow as hell too, like palemoon 27. Single page rendered 5 minits and can't scroll at all. p.s. I remember how fast was browsing in 2008 on this setup win W7 and first version of chrome and firefox 3.5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roytam1 Posted December 24, 2017 Author Share Posted December 24, 2017 3 hours ago, Dennnn said: I try your build of K-Meleon, it is slow as hell too, like palemoon 27. Single page rendered 5 minits and can't scroll at all. p.s. I remember how fast was browsing in 2008 on this setup win W7 and first version of chrome and firefox 3.5. maybe you have bad connection and/or bad video drivers? just tried KM76-Goanna on IDT WinChip 240MHz with Win2000, it renders a page within 1minute. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennnn Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 dxdiag say all ok, windows 7 graphic index more than 3.5 (cpu 2.9). 720/30p in MPC very smooth. 100mbit/s. May be I can make some debug ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
curiosil Posted December 28, 2017 Share Posted December 28, 2017 Hi guys, Happy holidays to everyone. I´m giving a try to New Moon, roytam1´s build, and have run into a problem I hope you can help me with. I installed the portable version with the loader, which works fine, but when I set it as default browser with a little proggie which works fine with all browsers tested so far, this one doesn´t work because it uses the loader. If I select the exe to be the default browser, it works, but the profile folder is created in Windows system folders, so it´s not portable anymore, and I don´t want this, I want the portable version with the profile folder in the program´s main folder. So, what can I do to set this portable browser as the default one? Another question... being this a build on the original New Moon by Feodor2, what´s the difference with the original, what does this one improve over the original? I´ve tried this one because it has this support forum, whereas New Moon doesn´t have one, as far as I know... Thanks. Regards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame. Posted December 28, 2017 Share Posted December 28, 2017 1 hour ago, curiosil said: I´m giving a try to New Moon, roytam1´s build, and have run into a problem I hope you can help me with. I installed the portable version with the loader, which works fine, but when I set it as default browser with a little proggie which works fine with all browsers tested so far, this one doesn´t work because it uses the loader. If I select the exe to be the default browser, it works, but the profile folder is created in Windows system folders, so it´s not portable anymore, and I don´t want this, I want the portable version with the profile folder in the program´s main folder. So, what can I do to set this portable browser as the default one? Hi, yep, that's a problem with portable mozillas. Please take a look at this question http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/177125-my-build-of-new-moon-temp-name-aka-pale-moon-for-xp/?do=findComment&comment=1146299 and author's response to it http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/177125-my-build-of-new-moon-temp-name-aka-pale-moon-for-xp/?do=findComment&comment=1146328 Looks like he was not overly happy with this task and, frankly, I don't blame him. So, other workarounds/options could be: 1) Start browser in portable mode beforehand, and then every time you try opening a link with same default browser you will get a new tab in that browser, unless it is started with "-no-remote" option. 2) Use that "proggie" of yours to configure the default browser to be started always with appropriate "-profile" option, or you may need to fiddle with the registry manually to do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
curiosil Posted December 28, 2017 Share Posted December 28, 2017 22 minutes ago, Flame. said: 2) Use that "proggie" of yours to configure the default browser to be started always with appropriate "-profile" option, or you may need to fiddle with the registry manually to do that. Hi, Thanks for your reply. And how would I do these 2 things, adding the argument and tweaking the registry? While waiting for an answer to my post, I´ve installed and tested the original New Moon browser, and this one works fine when as portable set as default browser, it opens the links within my e-mails, but if I try to open a second link it gives an error "Pale Moon is already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing Pale Moon process, or restart your system." d***... how can I fix this problem so New Moon can run multiple instances? I´ve tried the Linux version and it works fine, multiple instances can be opened. Cheers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts