MagicAndre1981 Posted February 16, 2014 Posted February 16, 2014 Changes to Superfetch to make it not as aggressive on RAM usagethis makes Win7 worse. The responsiveness of Vista is better because of the better Superfetch.
Flasche Posted February 16, 2014 Author Posted February 16, 2014 Changes to Superfetch to make it not as aggressive on RAM usagethis makes Win7 worse. The responsiveness of Vista is better because of the better Superfetch.One thing I can say is that vista is much faster on this computer than 7 ever was.
ricktendo Posted February 16, 2014 Posted February 16, 2014 If you give me the hardware id I can find the latest driver that supported vistaHey, if you are happy with Vista, then by all means keep using it
Flasche Posted February 16, 2014 Author Posted February 16, 2014 (edited) If you give me the hardware id I can find the latest driver that supported vistaHey, if you are happy with Vista, then by all means keep using itPCI\VEN_1814&DEV_3090&SUBSYS_663211AD&REV_00PCI\VEN_1814&DEV_3090&SUBSYS_663211ADPCI\VEN_1814&DEV_3090&CC_028000PCI\VEN_1814&DEV_3090&CC_0280Though you dont need to since some guy on the HP forums found the driver. http://h30434.www3.hp.com/t5/Desktop-Hardware/Hp-Pavilion-p6510y-desktop-network-controler-for-Windows/td-p/3530305I'm good to go Edited February 16, 2014 by Flasche
submix8c Posted February 16, 2014 Posted February 16, 2014 (oh, jeez...) That's what I really meant - Trade ya one PID/VID for two VEN/DEV's.
Flasche Posted February 16, 2014 Author Posted February 16, 2014 (oh, jeez...) That's what I really meant - Trade ya one PID/VID for two VEN/DEV's. How about 2 for 4. Seriously though thanks for ya help. OT: curious though do you have some webpage so I can do better google searches. I remember ages ago they taught me in school but no one cared to pay attention, but now I see the importance when finding things like dang drivers.
Jody Thornton Posted February 17, 2014 Posted February 17, 2014 Hey MagicAndre1981:You mention that Windows 7 is worse than Vista because its SuperFetch is less aggressive? I would be cautious with that statement. Both times I have installed Vista, I have found there to be better performance using just conventional prefetch. I have seen other systems showing this as well. Perhaps, the system was slow in relinquishing memory from SuperFetch use to regular application use, thus causing a bottleneck. Who's to say? I would say that in practice, Windows 7 outperforms Windows Vista in this area.
MagicAndre1981 Posted February 17, 2014 Posted February 17, 2014 Superfetch runs in low IO priority in background and doesn't impact other operations with normal or higher IO priorities.
ricktendo Posted February 17, 2014 Posted February 17, 2014 (edited) Though you dont need to since some guy on the HP forums found the driver. http://h30434.www3.hp.com/t5/Desktop-Hardware/Hp-Pavilion-p6510y-desktop-network-controler-for-Windows/td-p/3530305 I'm good to go Here is a newer one with Vista support v5.0.3.0 ftp://ftp.hp.com/pub/softpaq/sp63001-63500/sp63214.exe Edited February 17, 2014 by ricktendo
MagicAndre1981 Posted February 17, 2014 Posted February 17, 2014 VEN_1814 = RalinkDEV_3090 = Ralink RT3090Here are the latest drivers:http://www.station-drivers.com/index.php/10-drivers/54-ralink
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now