February 20, 200224 yr Heres a useless piece of information!!!I was reading an article from a science enquirer, which stated that digital clocks will be in sync with the date line today for the second time in history.A digital clock usually reads in 24hr time....so at 20:02 (8:02 pm)they will be exactly be in sync with todays date and year.so at 20:02 on the 20th day February (20.02) in the year 2002 everything will be in sync. This has happened only once before...so we are now a part of history!!!it was an english magazine so I didnt really put the figure together at first regarding the (20.02) day/mth??
February 20, 200224 yr The first time it happened was at 10:01am on 10th January 1001http://calendar.dmusic.com/2002/02/20
February 21, 200224 yr yes americans put the date the wrong way round,. its confusing and silly. you dont write December 25th 2002, so why do 12/25/02 ?? 25th [b:84eb5fb19f]OF[/b:84eb5fb19f] December 2002 = 25/12/02
February 21, 200224 yr you dont write December 25th 2002, so why do 12/25/02 ?? [/quote:4675dbbc9d] Yes we do Jack. For example, if i were to write an essay today, in the to left corner of the page i would write, Febuary 20th, 2002......DUH-Drew
February 21, 200224 yr [b:e2291a1918]you dont write December 25th 2002, so why do 12/25/02 [/b:e2291a1918] But of course that is how you write it. Today is:Feb. 20, 2002 .... so why wouldn't I write that in short hand..2....20..2002 ----> or 2/20/2002 --->2/20/02You Brits kill me...... :D LS
February 21, 200224 yr Bah, it's happened before, what about this date:January 20, 2001 at approximatly 20:01Or if we're allowed to do it Month/Day, and not Day/Month, how about this:October 10, 1010, at approximatly 10:10OrOctober 21, 1021 at approximatly 10:21.Maybe it's just me, but it seems like this has happened many many times before. Which magaziene was it? Unless it was Scientific American, they may have no clue what they're talking about.
February 21, 200224 yr Author [b:0aeef9e9c3] XxMaNsOnX [/b:0aeef9e9c3] - Im not a scientist so I dont really think much about these kinds of things, check the link that [b:0aeef9e9c3]Reverend[/b:0aeef9e9c3] posted and ask them thereI dont know how they work this out and it was taken from a English science magazine, so to me the date should read mm/dd(02/20), although your query sounds legit to me
February 21, 200224 yr This one works which ever way round you write the day and month.11 minutes past 11am on the 11th of November in the year 1111:time 11:11 - date 11/11 - year 1111
February 21, 200224 yr This one works which ever way round you write the day and month. 00 minutes past 00am on the 00th of (no calendar then) in the year 0000Does that fit the bill?LOLBig Booger
February 22, 200224 yr writting it down the way you do is daft.. al the numbers are at one side wich could be confusing
February 22, 200224 yr Me and my girfriend had this same conversation last nite. It seems that it has happened more then twise, but as i read through the article, i think the reason why it has only happened twise, is because the front and back of the armytime,date and year have to mirror each other. for example.[b:062f26d87b]20:02[/b:062f26d87b] the first part(20) is the oposite of the latter part(02). this also works for [b:062f26d87b]10:01[/b:062f26d87b]. the numbers have to switch order, and match both the date and year. [b:062f26d87b]Ex. AB:BA[/b:062f26d87b]The reason why this cannot continue to happen it beacaue Army time doesnt gopast 24:00........ and thus will never happen in again.-Drew
February 22, 200224 yr Author sounds like a good way of looking at it, I guess thats how they figured itGo Drewdatrip:cool:
February 22, 200224 yr .... in about 100 years. Guess we won't be around to see it, but won't 9:12 PM on the 21st day of December in the year 2112 do it:21:12 21.12.2112hehehehe LS
February 22, 200224 yr Author LS_Dragons - I'II still be here so I will let u know, maybe I will have an answer to this stupid theory by then:D
Create an account or sign in to comment