Justas Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 Hello all, I am not sure where this would belong...But here is my problem. I have a system with a SATA (OS installed) and an IDE (Storage drive) HDD. I have the boot priority setup in the BIOS to have the SATA one boot first. However when the system loses power ONLY the HDD priority settings will be reset to default (IDE first, SATA second). This causes problems because the system needs to be up as much as possible. And if it goes to the IDE HDD first it will not boot into Windows until someone gets there to manually change it. I am thinking maybe a new BIOS might help. But, if I have to, I can just move the OS to the IDE drive (But that defeats to purpose of even having the other SATA drive so it would be a last resort)Any advice would be appreciated, and sorry if I posted this in thee wrong section. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puntoMX Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 Welcome to the MSFN forums, you are on the right place .Update your BIOS first. When you don’t have luck with that then replace the battery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmX.Memnoch Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 (edited) What's the system used for that it has to be up all the time? It almost sounds like you're using it as an entry-level file server. I'm asking for a specific reason... Edited September 13, 2007 by nmX.Memnoch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justas Posted September 13, 2007 Author Share Posted September 13, 2007 I build the systems, this one happens to be for a security company. They say they want it to work this way, so I need to make it happen. And yea, I will try the BIOS when I get a chance. Might not get to reply within next hour though. This is first time I have ever seen just 1 setting reset in the BIOS though. Seemed kind of odd, so hopefully a BIOS update/Battery can solve it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmX.Memnoch Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 I guess what I was getting at is...what's the reason for the two drives? Is the data on the IDE drive being constantly updated and the SATA drive is only used for the OS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justas Posted September 13, 2007 Author Share Posted September 13, 2007 They only said they wanted the SATA HDD to have the OS and special partitions. And just to have the IDE as a separate drive for information. I assume they are using it to store data for their security devices. (The SATA HDD has an OS partition and others for different uses.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmX.Memnoch Posted September 14, 2007 Share Posted September 14, 2007 See...I would've talked them out of that. The OS drive doesn't need to be that fast if it's largely going to remain static. The IDE drive is probably plenty fast enough for it. If they're going to be storing dynamic data I would've talked them into using the SATA drive for that (or just put two SATA drives in the system and be done with the conversation). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaclaz Posted September 14, 2007 Share Posted September 14, 2007 But, though not actually the solution to your hardware problem:What prevents you from putting a NTLDR+BOOT.INI+NTDETECT.COM+(NTBOOTDD.SYS) on the IDE drive, with an entry in BOOT.INI to load the OS on the SATA drive? Also, if the data is valuable and expecially it is a security company we are talking about, a UPS is a MUST, as I see it.jaclaz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justas Posted September 14, 2007 Author Share Posted September 14, 2007 Yea I agree they should put it on a UPS, and the single SATA/multiple SATA drives. However the IDE was cheaper so they only wanted the 1 SATA. And I am not sure why they didn't have a UPS on the system to begin with.NTLDR+BOOT.INI+NTDETECT.COM+(NTBOOTDD.SYS)Correct me if I am wrong, but you are just saying to add a path to the NTLDR and other files, of the OS drive, to the BOOT.ini on the IDE drive? I am new to this kind of thing, still lots to learn lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaclaz Posted September 15, 2007 Share Posted September 15, 2007 Correct me if I am wrong, but you are just saying to add a path to the NTLDR and other files, of the OS drive, to the BOOT.ini on the IDE drive? I am new to this kind of thing, still lots to learn lolYes, as I see it there are TWO booting scenarios:1) BIOS is "right" and SATA drive becomes bootdrive, i.e. \\.\PHYSICALDRIVE0, IDE becomes \\.\PHYSICALDRIVE12) BIOS is "wrong" and IDE becomes bootdrive, i.e. \\.\PHYSICALDRIVE0, SATA becomes \\.\PHYSICALDRIVE1Now you have on the SATA drive FIRST ACTIVE PRIMARY PARTITION ROOT:NTLDRNTDETECT.COM(NTBOOTDD.SYS)BOOT.INI with contents similar to:[boot loader]timeout=30default=multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\WINDOWS[operating systems]multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\WINDOWS="Microsoft Windows XP Professional" /fastdetectIf you add to the IDE drive FIRST ACTIVE PRIMARY PARTITION ROOT a copy of:NTLDRNTDETECT.COM(NTBOOTDD.SYS)BOOT.INI with contents similar to:[boot loader]timeout=30default=multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(1)partition(1)\WINDOWS[operating systems]multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(1)partition(1)\WINDOWS="Microsoft Windows XP Professional" /fastdetectWhen scenario 2) happens, machine will boot as well as before.Drive lettering should NOT be affected as it is dependant on drive signatures, so any "normal" program will work as before.If you have programs, batches or whatever that use the other available syntaxes for "low-level" access to the drives, like \\.\PHYSICALDRIVEx or the \device\Harddiskx\Partitiony or the \Device\HarddiskVolumez, those WILL change, and you need to provide some workarounds.Read these to get an idea of what I am talking about:http://www.msfn.org/board/Discovery_Unusua...ery_t33030.htmlhttp://www.msfn.org/board/BOOTINI_hard_drive_t25365.htmlhttp://www.boot-land.net/forums/index.php?...=2425&st=19jaclaz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justas Posted September 16, 2007 Author Share Posted September 16, 2007 Thanks for the info. But after updating BIOS to the new BETA it hasn't happened again. Whatever the problem was, it must have been a BIOS error after all. Still nice to know how to manually redirect drives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puntoMX Posted September 16, 2007 Share Posted September 16, 2007 If you did what I posted the customer would have got your there system 3 days earlier .Good it´s fixed now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now