
NotHereToPlayGames
MemberContent Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by NotHereToPlayGames
-
The irony there is that I once called up Chase and CLOSED my account with them all on account of Chase.com no longer working in NM28. That would have been about four years ago or so. Little did I know at the time just where the "web" was headed and just how many "no longer working" sites I would encounter in the following years. With Chase, NM28 no longer working was my last straw because that was the THIRD browser in just two short years that "no longer worked" with Chase.
- 2,340 replies
-
1
-
That's because a Win10 "Jump List" is like a programs "Recent File" list. Clearing those lists do not send them to the Recycle Bin because they are all stored in the Windows Registry. A deleted registry key is not sent to the Recycle Bin just like clearing a program's recent file list is not sent to the Recycle Bin.
-
My Browser Builds (Part 4)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
lol Though not sure I'd really brag about three tiny months. Firefox v94 was released on November 2, 2021. Chrome v98 was released on February 1, 2022. I suppose if we want to play that game, shouldn't we dig deep into any other have/have-nots between the two versions? And shouldn't we then call this a "Mozillaism" since everything else is always called a "Googleism"? -
My Browser Builds (Part 4)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
A reminder-link for those that may be interested -- https://msfn.org/board/topic/183484-polyfill-whats-all-this-then/?do=findComment&comment=1216125 Thanks again, @UCyborg -
My Browser Builds (Part 4)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Would you happen to have a breakdown of what polyfills are resolved via your palefill that are newer than Chrome v86? -
It has also been reported on some forums that ECC certs in XP have been FALSIFIED as "secure" by some XP web browsers.
- 2,340 replies
-
1
-
If you are talking about these, I would advise against checkmarking these two options. You essentially INTRODUCE a man-in-the-middle to "check" if you have a man-in-the-middle.
- 2,340 replies
-
1
-
In my opinion, one should NEVER "manually update" certificates. While other MSFN Members would equally swear the exact opposite as their opinion. I've NEVER updated my "certificates" and I have no problem whatsoever with the web site in question. Chrome/Chromium uses XP's "certificate store". I let XP manage that "certificate store". "Opinions are like butts. Everybody has one, not everybody wants to hear them."
- 2,340 replies
-
1
-
That could be your problem. I have never in my entire life "updated" system certificates. How they update "behind the scenes" is unknown, but I have never in my entire life "manually updated" system certificates.
- 2,340 replies
-
Also, unless I'm mistaken, you run XP x86 SP2. XP x86 SP2 was released in August 2004!
- 2,340 replies
-
2
-
Did you try in an INCOGNITO WINDOW? And without setting any extensions to be allowed during Incognito Mode.
- 2,340 replies
-
1
-
Yes. Chrome/Chromium support for CSS 3D pre-dates v86 by over a DECADE. Chromium v86 was released 06/10/2020 (day/month/year, I sure as Hades wish there was a universally-accepted date format!).
- 2,340 replies
-
2
-
Working for me in v13.5 which is the same rendering engine as v13.
- 2,340 replies
-
1