Jump to content

Sampei.Nihira

Member
  • Posts

    1,288
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    30
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Italy

Everything posted by Sampei.Nihira

  1. Have you tried the alternative solution provided by Microsoft? https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-0674 For 32-bit systems, enter the following command at an administrative command prompt: For 64-bit systems, enter the following command at an administrative command prompt: It could probably be an elegant solution with Windows Vista.
  2. Several malwares have abused legitimate OS executables for their attack. Some more info in the article below: https://blog.talosintelligence.com/2019/11/hunting-for-lolbins.html These executables between which wscript.exe and cscript.exe should also be brought under control. I have no problem running I.E. even with these exe under control of NVT OSA: OSA also has a rule for blocking 2 exes. And as you see I.E.8 it works: What do you need the web page for? Isn't my demonstration enough, what Vistapocalypse, Microsoft, 0-Patch ..... etc wrote about it?
  3. @roytam1 For now, 76 infected in Italy, 2 deaths: https://www.grottaglieinrete.it/it/ultimora-coronavirus-emergenza-sanitaria-governo-emana-decreto-legge/
  4. https://0patch.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360018881053-Which-operating-systems-are-currently-supported-by-0patch- https://0patch.com/pricing.html https://0patch.com/patches.html 0Patch Agent should work on Windows XP:
  5. It's simple, the developer of UBO Legacy is Just Off. Which carries on the UBO legacy project especially for Pale Moon and Basilisk. UBO 1.17.4 cannot be installed with these browsers. I didn't understand your next question.
  6. Attention also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trident_(software) Control.exe nusrmgr.cpl
  7. The development of UBO 1.17.4 has stopped. The version of UBO Legacy that I and other MSFN users use is still actively developed. @mockingbird In fact, I use New Moon.............
  8. Now that I have some free time I have done a test to check the CVE-2020-0674 vulnerability in my I.E.8. I found the test file thanks to 0Patch: https://blog.0patch.com/2020/01/micropatching-workaround-for-cve-2020.html To make the test after the creation of the HTLM file I had to make 2 changes: but the result is unexceptionable: I.E.8 is vulnerable. I urge users to consider disabling scripts on I.E.8: F12 - Disable script and the block of executables via trick 1803: I don't use I.E.8, so I've also enabled a rule in OSArmor for total browser blocking.
  9. Has anyone tried if the embedded W7 updates install? Microsoft Update catalog enter in the search box Windows 7 2020-02
  10. Chrome is also moving in the direction of blocking mixed content: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/google/google-chrome-to-block-mixed-content-downloads-prevents-mitm-attacks/ My situation with NM28: test: https://browserleaks.com/ssl I have also enabled images: "security.mixed_content.block_display_content" set to true.
  11. Out UBO Legacy v.1.16.4.17 https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock-for-firefox-legacy/releases/tag/firefox-legacy-1.16.4.17
  12. The latest version of SandboxIE that best suits working with Windows XP is 3.76. Later versions don't work well with W.XP: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/design/sandbox.md Subsequent versions of SBIE at 3.76 are based on these 4 Windows security mechanisms: A restricted token The Windows job object The Windows desktop object Integrity levels This also applies to Chrome based browsers. Consider this info for not having a false sense of security.
  13. @VistaLover You're right I also have adwCleaner 6.047: https://malwaretips.com/threads/sampei-nihira-security-config-winxp-pos-ready2009-2020.97166/page-9 It is also possible to check it from my security configuration published on MT. FileHippo must have forgotten this build !! VistaLover wrote: Absolutely not. I uninstalled all the versions of the NET FW on my pc with W.XP.
  14. The latest version of AdwCleaner that works with Windows XP is 6.046. The following ones don't work: https://filehippo.com/download_adwcleaner/history/
  15. @roytam1 In a few days the cost of surgical masks has more than doubled:
  16. Potplayer new Version 200206 (February 6, 2020)
  17. Roy as soon as my wife returns home we place the order. Which should arrive at my house from 12 to 15 February. Then we agree on the shipment. But my daughter and wife ask me to tell you that we will send you not 50 masks but 47 because 3 we will keep them for any of our needs. My daughter is always on the go. I am sure you will understand. Order executed:
  18. Ok let's first think about the order of the surgical masks, then I'll think about the necessary for the shipment.
  19. I saw that if I place my order it will now arrive by February 14th. But now I'm not at home, I'm out of town on business, I would place the order on Monday 10 February during the day. Then after the product has arrived we agree privately for the shipment to Hong Kong. Read this, I don't know if there will be problems: https://www.dhl.it/exp-it/express/assistenza_doganale/documentazione_doganale/regolamentazione_doganale_cina.html Translate In some cases the Chinese customs reserve the right to carry out additional checks on the goods, to assess the non-commercial nature of the shipment (otherwise it is sent back to the sender) - goods sent to individuals as a gift: copy of the recipient's ID card; detailed goods list and pro forma invoice. p.s. And then there is also a pro forma invoice, I don't think I can declare false (i.e. cloths). In your country there are too restrictive rules
  20. See if there is something for you: https://www.amazon.it/s?k=maschere+chirurgiche&__mk_it_IT=ÅMÅŽÕÑ&ref=nb_sb_noss_2
×
×
  • Create New...