Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Sampei.Nihira
-
Have you tried the alternative solution provided by Microsoft? https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-0674 For 32-bit systems, enter the following command at an administrative command prompt: For 64-bit systems, enter the following command at an administrative command prompt: It could probably be an elegant solution with Windows Vista.
-
Several malwares have abused legitimate OS executables for their attack. Some more info in the article below: https://blog.talosintelligence.com/2019/11/hunting-for-lolbins.html These executables between which wscript.exe and cscript.exe should also be brought under control. I have no problem running I.E. even with these exe under control of NVT OSA: OSA also has a rule for blocking 2 exes. And as you see I.E.8 it works: What do you need the web page for? Isn't my demonstration enough, what Vistapocalypse, Microsoft, 0-Patch ..... etc wrote about it?
-
My Browser Builds (Part 2)
Sampei.Nihira replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
-
My Browser Builds (Part 2)
Sampei.Nihira replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
@roytam1 For now, 76 infected in Italy, 2 deaths: https://www.grottaglieinrete.it/it/ultimora-coronavirus-emergenza-sanitaria-governo-emana-decreto-legge/ -
https://0patch.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360018881053-Which-operating-systems-are-currently-supported-by-0patch- https://0patch.com/pricing.html https://0patch.com/patches.html 0Patch Agent should work on Windows XP:
-
Attention also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trident_(software) Control.exe nusrmgr.cpl
-
Now that I have some free time I have done a test to check the CVE-2020-0674 vulnerability in my I.E.8. I found the test file thanks to 0Patch: https://blog.0patch.com/2020/01/micropatching-workaround-for-cve-2020.html To make the test after the creation of the HTLM file I had to make 2 changes: but the result is unexceptionable: I.E.8 is vulnerable. I urge users to consider disabling scripts on I.E.8: F12 - Disable script and the block of executables via trick 1803: I don't use I.E.8, so I've also enabled a rule in OSArmor for total browser blocking.
-
My Browser Builds (Part 2)
Sampei.Nihira replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
@LoneCrusader -
Win7 End Of Support - KB4524752 MS Nagging Has Started
Sampei.Nihira replied to WalksInSilence's topic in Windows 7
Has anyone tried if the embedded W7 updates install? Microsoft Update catalog enter in the search box Windows 7 2020-02 -
My Browser Builds (Part 2)
Sampei.Nihira replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Chrome is also moving in the direction of blocking mixed content: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/google/google-chrome-to-block-mixed-content-downloads-prevents-mitm-attacks/ My situation with NM28: test: https://browserleaks.com/ssl I have also enabled images: "security.mixed_content.block_display_content" set to true. -
My Browser Builds (Part 2)
Sampei.Nihira replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
@roytam1 I wrote you an private message. -
YT may not work on old browsers anymore, starting March 2020
Sampei.Nihira replied to reboot12's topic in Windows XP
The latest version of SandboxIE that best suits working with Windows XP is 3.76. Later versions don't work well with W.XP: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/design/sandbox.md Subsequent versions of SBIE at 3.76 are based on these 4 Windows security mechanisms: A restricted token The Windows job object The Windows desktop object Integrity levels This also applies to Chrome based browsers. Consider this info for not having a false sense of security. -
@VistaLover You're right I also have adwCleaner 6.047: https://malwaretips.com/threads/sampei-nihira-security-config-winxp-pos-ready2009-2020.97166/page-9 It is also possible to check it from my security configuration published on MT. FileHippo must have forgotten this build !! VistaLover wrote: Absolutely not. I uninstalled all the versions of the NET FW on my pc with W.XP.
-
My Browser Builds (Part 2)
Sampei.Nihira replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
@roytam1 In a few days the cost of surgical masks has more than doubled: -
My Browser Builds (Part 2)
Sampei.Nihira replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
NM28: -
Latest Version of Software Running on XP
Sampei.Nihira replied to pointertovoid's topic in Windows XP
Potplayer new Version 200206 (February 6, 2020) -
My Browser Builds (Part 2)
Sampei.Nihira replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Roy as soon as my wife returns home we place the order. Which should arrive at my house from 12 to 15 February. Then we agree on the shipment. But my daughter and wife ask me to tell you that we will send you not 50 masks but 47 because 3 we will keep them for any of our needs. My daughter is always on the go. I am sure you will understand. Order executed: -
My Browser Builds (Part 2)
Sampei.Nihira replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Ok let's first think about the order of the surgical masks, then I'll think about the necessary for the shipment. -
My Browser Builds (Part 2)
Sampei.Nihira replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I saw that if I place my order it will now arrive by February 14th. But now I'm not at home, I'm out of town on business, I would place the order on Monday 10 February during the day. Then after the product has arrived we agree privately for the shipment to Hong Kong. Read this, I don't know if there will be problems: https://www.dhl.it/exp-it/express/assistenza_doganale/documentazione_doganale/regolamentazione_doganale_cina.html Translate In some cases the Chinese customs reserve the right to carry out additional checks on the goods, to assess the non-commercial nature of the shipment (otherwise it is sent back to the sender) - goods sent to individuals as a gift: copy of the recipient's ID card; detailed goods list and pro forma invoice. p.s. And then there is also a pro forma invoice, I don't think I can declare false (i.e. cloths). In your country there are too restrictive rules -
My Browser Builds (Part 2)
Sampei.Nihira replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
See if there is something for you: https://www.amazon.it/s?k=maschere+chirurgiche&__mk_it_IT=ÅMÅŽÕÑ&ref=nb_sb_noss_2