Tihiy

Well, maybe I should remove that check.

Well, if specified drive have size >128GB, this message will be shown. If it does but it is filled to more than 128GB, this message won't be shown. I'm not sure if it is a right method but it is one of.

Here it is: Scandskw 32-bit replacement, v"1.1" - Do not allows to check >128GB disk if it is not filled by data more than 128GB. - Do not allows to check NTFS drives. Resources can be translated. Why i can't edit my post on 1st page? scandskw.zip

Without a problem!.. Anything more?

I can't see reason... Give me good example, please.

WRONG! As before, it's wrapper over shell functions. Delete scandisk.exe and check if you don't believe.

Yes, hahaha! I'm writing everything on it. That was my secret.

azagahl, where can I get that WINFILE.EXE? I can't find it in 2k distro.

Well, you can if it works OK. My scandisk is bigger, because - Bit more features - Includes more icon variations, including 32-bit ones - PowerBasic compiler sux! You can compress it with UPX executable packer. As for Kernel32.dll, it's because it has hard-coded function offset values - it's difficult to write proper calls for undocumented APIs.

AH FORGOT!!! It works only with KERNEL32.DLL 4.10.2225 (included in SP2RC3 and higher)

Here is my 2 hours of work: 32-bit scandisk. What? No, no! Not really rewrited scan disk 9x function or such. It's just a replacement over standard scandskw and: - As a 32-bit application, it's more stable! - As a 32-bit application, it can talk with other 32-bit extensions - As a 32-bit application, it can be skinned! It supports standard parameters: scandskw.exe [disk list] [parameters] /a Check all your local hard disks. /n Start and quit ScanDisk automatically. /p Prevent ScanDisk from correcting any errors it finds. +additional+ /surface: Force surface scan /custom: Disallow to change your settings /noui: Background (no UI) scanning /min: Minimized scanning Tihiy scandskw.exe

USER.EXE without proper USER32.DLL will cause LOCKUP! Have you deleted USER32.DLL also?

Yes! Take a look at: http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=36123

Why there are different versions for FE and SE?

Wrote my own history - didn't like it: deleted Anything special? Even Office?!

Really, it looks like hexed (even resources aren't changed) file. But why it can't be from MS? It looks like high quality patch anyway.

Really i'm lost... Should i remove or stay with my current check code? As I understand, this patch does not check icon before loading, it removes theoretical exploit possibility, preventing buffer overrun. MDGx, maybe you should add OS checking code? I don't think that it will be good to install it on other OSes.

Yes, and should it should replace MS patch? I believe 2 vulnerabilites meant in article are separated.

Thats OMG! MS made actual new patch for Windows? Where did you find it?! I can't see any info about it on page. Slovenian update still without new KRNL386.EXE...

Any reason?

Lol? Well, Eiger isn't really an OS More, it isn't a customer OS which be worth upgrading. As for me, i'm on XP

Why 32x32x256 and not 1x1x1? No icon, but saves bit more!

Here is the small thingie: Idler is a very old thingie which i've found in the deeps of archives. Its idea is simple: it patches Windows 9x kernel when loaded to provide automatic cpu halt when idle, saving power. It occupies only 4KB and does not stay in memory! I haven't tested it well, but maybe u'll find it useful. IDLER.zip

Not very hard, just don't like them. Maybe sometime.

Webcheck != Web View in any sense. Web View in 9x/Me/2k != "Tasks Panes" in XP/2003/+.