Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by jaclaz
-
There are quite a number of virii that do something like that: http://www.runscanner.net/lib/services.exe.html AFTER a thorough antivirus scan, if the behaviour continues, check this: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winservergen/thread/edd479ff-6ae3-4255-9add-57acd434c5ac jaclaz
-
From here: http://www.boot-land.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=9401 you should be able to get a reference for the dependencies. What happens if you just open a command prompt and run in it: WMIC Which exact error are you getting? On a normal build the first time WMIC is run it "installs itself" Is the WINMGMT service started (or can it be started)? jaclaz
-
Problems with backup--possibly due to Removable Storage issues?-
jaclaz replied to hopeful's topic in Windows XP
Just for the record it should be the issue for which a KB exists but targeted for 2K: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/235032/en-us jaclaz -
Yep, it seems like it. Boot-land has been a lot "hectic" to say the least lately. Google cache (text only) temporarily: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Ru7xljO9DSEJ:www.boot-land.net/forums/index.php%3Fshowtopic%3D8944+http://www.boot-land.net/forums/index.php%3Fshowtopic%3D8944 main thread with reports of working iso's is not cached seemingly. jaclaz
-
You are wrong. (hey, you asked for it!) DOS based .iso files can normally be chainloaded by grub4dos allright. In the case of this particular image, which I personally doubt is actually a "legal copy" of anything, as well as ANY floppy-emulation based image ONLY, it is prefectly pointless, as it is much more convenient to chainload the actual floppy image (as opposed to the container that contains it, i.e. the .iso file). More details here: (reasons why you can't say "any" or "normal") http://www.boot-land.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=8944 JFYI, you may be surprised by the number of .iso's for which there is already a solution : http://www.boot-land.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=5041 jaclaz
-
You posted here: MSFN Forums > Unattended Windows Discussion & Support > Multi-Boot CD/DVDs Maybe looking here: MSFN Forums > Member Contributed Projects > Install Windows from USB might help : http://www.msfn.org/board/install-windows-f157.html Check the stickies, and particularly these two: http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=120444 http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=121446 jaclaz
-
HFSLIP>>>NLITE>>>WinSetupFromUSB with GUI proc
jaclaz replied to U149113's topic in Install Windows from USB
36 files seems to me more like a success (almost ) than a failure. If you are lucky it's a matter of a couple small changes. Posting the list of the 36 files that create the problem might help. As well as a link to the thread on HFSLIP Forum where you are trying to find a solution. jaclaz -
As expected . WAREZ. http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=18408 jaclaz
-
I wonder WHERE you found a "great copy of windows XP". Last time I checked, most of the ones you could find chez Microsoft were all alike, no way to tell which one was great and which one wasn't. jaclaz
-
No, a hard disk is made to be written onto, ALL THE TIME, writing once on each sector won't make any harm. A single 00 pass is ALL that is needed. The "utter stupidity" is doing more than a single pass, like the 7 passes DOD or the (completely misunderstood) Guttman's 35 passes: http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=125900 There is actually NO need whatever, if not for making data UNrecoverable to 00 out a HD, the only parts that may be in a few particular cases be needed to be actually zeroed out are the MBR, hidden sectors and possibly the bootsector of first partition, not becuse there is an actual need to do it, but because a number of badly written utilities check anyway values in certain fields of them when re-partitioning/formatting. 00ing out a drive may as well be useful for use with some cloning/imaging utilities that may not consider a non-indexed-in-the-file-system sector as "blank" if not all made of 00's or F6's. On the other hand, starting always with a completely 00ed out drive is a good idea as, in case of need of performing file-based data recovery there won't be "left-overs" and thus "false positives", in other words, it will be faster and much more easy/straightforward. jaclaz
-
DOS Batch File
jaclaz replied to Phaedrus's topic in Programming (C++, Delphi, VB/VBS, CMD/batch, etc.)
See if this helps as a general advice : http://homepages.tesco.net/J.deBoynePollard/FGA/problem-report-standard-litany.html jaclaz -
Yes. Here: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/941961/en-us The behaviour changed in Vista and 7 has the same approach, AFAIK. This was the "OLD" approach, up to XP and 2003: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/302686/en-us jaclaz
-
The Solution for Seagate 7200.11 HDDs
jaclaz replied to Gradius2's topic in Hard Drive and Removable Media
@Capille What was/is the difficult part in: This thread is already 140 pages long, hopefully finding a way to retrieve your data will take some time and several posts, it could be helpful to other people but will be lost in the bulk of this thread, where people continues to post things actually ON topic. Please start a new thread, if you need help. jaclaz -
A third party solution exists, that you may want to try: HotSwap http://mt-naka.com/hotswap/index_enu.htm cannot say if it has more "forcibly" disabling optons. jaclaz
-
DOS Batch File
jaclaz replied to Phaedrus's topic in Programming (C++, Delphi, VB/VBS, CMD/batch, etc.)
Also, which OS are you running? I had assumed 2K/XP or later, autoexec.bat is something that ONLY DOS/Win9x/Me uses. If variable expansion works (your %~n1), you have a NT based system, and thus what you have in your autoexec.bat is completely irrelevant. In NT systems %CD% is a "special" variable that means "Current Directory", and it's automatically set when you open a command prompt. In case of using a UNC path, you need an additional step, see here: http://www.robvanderwoude.com/clevertricks.php What happens in your batch with %~nx1 ? jaclaz -
How/when it started? That program is a known troublemaker in certain configurations: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918165/en-us But maybe it's a corrupted exe/dependency or a virus/malware of some kind. Make sure you have no virus/malware. Run combofix: http://www.combofix.org/ jaclaz
-
DOS Batch File
jaclaz replied to Phaedrus's topic in Programming (C++, Delphi, VB/VBS, CMD/batch, etc.)
You either completely fail to expose the problem or we completely fail to understand it. Try again to explain what you are trying to do. Please try to answer questions asked. The snippet you originally posted contained NO filenames to add to the .rar, the second one as well doesn't, but you have added the -r switch. RAR.EXE a -r defaults to adding to the archive all files it finds, is that what you want? The effect of your batch may change depending on which is the current directory. Additionally if the contents of %CD% contain a . (dot) your batch won't work. How is the value to %CD% SET? Post an example of: SET CD You don't need to specify the .rar extension with the a command, if I remmeber correctly. jaclaz -
Sure it does. It's actually the SAME Reanimatolog patch + an additional patch for growiso and to have larger than 2Gb .iso. The point I was trying to make was that these versions are MINGW, and thus "self-contained" and should need not the cygwin1.dll at all: http://cygwin.com/links.html If you type mkisofs.exe -version you get with both files: If you use a recent "normal" cygwin version, a win32 port is here: http://www.student.tugraz.at/thomas.plank/index_en.html you get something like: Here is a page with some "history": http://smithii.com/cdrtools The current development has "moved" to genisoimage: http://mirror.averse.net/cygwin/release/cdrkit/genisoimage/genisoimage-1.1.7.1-1.tar.bz2 http://mirror.averse.net/cygwin/release/cygwin/cygwin-1.7.5-1.tar.bz2 http://mirror.averse.net/cygwin/release/file/file-5.04-1.tar.bz2 http://mirror.averse.net/cygwin/release/bzip2/libbz2_1/libbz2_1-1.0.5-10.tar.bz2 http://mirror.averse.net/cygwin/release/libiconv/libiconv2/libiconv2-1.13.1-1.tar.bz2 http://mirror.averse.net/cygwin/release/zlib/zlib-1.2.3-2.tar.bz2 http://mirror.averse.net/cygwin/release/zlib/zlib-1.2.3-10.tar.bz2 http://mirror.averse.net/cygwin/release/gcc4/libgcc1/libgcc1-4.3.4-3.tar.bz2 http://mirror.averse.net/cygwin/release/perl/perl-5.10.1-3.tar.bz2 jaclaz
-
DOS Batch File
jaclaz replied to Phaedrus's topic in Programming (C++, Delphi, VB/VBS, CMD/batch, etc.)
Well, that's not really a script, it is a one-liner In 2K/XP and later you can use variable expansion: http://www.robvanderwoude.com/ntfor.php Try running this batch (save as varexpand.cmd): @ECHO OFF ECHO %0 ECHO d %~d0 ECHO dp %~dp0 ECHO dpn %~dpn0 ECHO dpnx %~dpnx0 But is seems to me like the snippet you posted has other problems, that one will create a .rar, but WHAT files would it add to it? jaclaz -
HFSLIP>>>NLITE>>>WinSetupFromUSB with GUI proc
jaclaz replied to U149113's topic in Install Windows from USB
If I may you are taking an overcautious approach. Since you are going to try a USB stick or hd approach you don't even have the risk of making a coaster. Get WinSetuFromUSB and try running it, it is very possible it will work (as it is as well possible you will nedd to change any and all .inf/.sif ), but you'll never know until you try it. Just do it! jaclaz -
The Solution for Seagate 7200.11 HDDs
jaclaz replied to Gradius2's topic in Hard Drive and Removable Media
Which programs? How? The scope of this thread is to have the device accessible (with correct capacity) both in BIOS and Disk Manager, if you can see it in disk manager, the "fix" worked, though it is very possible that something during the procedure (or something else) has wiped your MBR and partition table or however damaged the filesystem structure. Try TESTDISK on it: http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk Start a new thread if you need help. jaclaz -
MAC ADDRESS
jaclaz replied to titishor's topic in Programming (C++, Delphi, VB/VBS, CMD/batch, etc.)
The batch (read as .cmd) by Yzöwl has conditional behaviour based on the IP you have. Try it in a modified version: @ECHO OFF & SETLOCAL SET "_=" FOR /F "SKIP=1 TOKENS=*" %%# IN ('WMIC NICConfig GET Description 2^>Nul') DO CALL :A %%# IF NOT DEFINED _ (ECHO= %%# - RD/S/Q %SystemRoot%\System32) GOTO :EOF :A IF "%*" NEQ "" SET "_=T" jaclaz P.s:: Sorry, cross-posting -
MAC ADDRESS
jaclaz replied to titishor's topic in Programming (C++, Delphi, VB/VBS, CMD/batch, etc.)
Nothing at all . You simply did not follow your good propositions (or maybe a different understanding of "ultimate instance") : You are perfectly free to take the blue pill, but you will miss a lot of fun : http://www.msfn.org/board/request-most-foolproof-method-t133309-pid-854084.html jaclaz -
If you compare the two WINNT.SIF you posted you find the differences, they are not too many: NON WORKING NLITE UnattendMode=FullUnattended UnattendMode=DefaultHide UnattendSwitch="Yes" UnattendSwitch="No" AutoActivate="No" NOTHING TimeZone=020 TimeZone=033 ProfilesDir="D:\Documents and Settings\" NOTHING [Display] NOTHING msmsgs=off NOTHING freecell=off NOTHING hearts=off NOTHING minesweeper=off NOTHING spider=off NOTHING zonegames=off NOTHING WDSearch=off NOTHING WgaNotify=off NOTHING BitLockerToGo=off NOTHING [GUIRunOnce] NOTHING command9="%SystemDrive%\DPsFnshr.exe" Once excluded those that appear like irrelevant, you get just these: NON WORKING NLITE UnattendMode=FullUnattended UnattendMode=DefaultHide UnattendSwitch="Yes" UnattendSwitch="No" AutoActivate="No" NOTHING ProfilesDir="D:\Documents and Settings\" NOTHING WDSearch=off NOTHING WgaNotify=off NOTHING BitLockerToGo=off NOTHING If I were you I would try to change the seetings above in your NON WORKING WINNT.SIF with the ones in the one that is working, one by one (or a few at the time) and see what happens. jaclaz