jaclaz

Naah, you didn't overstep at all, just having a bit of fun at the way you phrased it, don't worry. coot.ini jaclaz

I cannot say what you are assuming , I would hope that Admins have something more interesting/entertaining to do on a saturday evening. It's not (yet) a DEFCON 1 situation. jaclaz

boo

Confirmed, it is b o o t . i n i that cannot be posted, it makes no sense whatsoever.

oot.ini

ot.ini

t.ini

Yep, but in this specific case it seems like it depends on the contents of a post, is almost like there is a word filter gone astray. jaclaz

.ini

boot

b o o t . i n i I cannot post the above without the spaces. Queer.

IF the bootmgr\bcd in Vista is similar enough to ntldr\

test It is a curious case, I cannot post a given sentence. Here it gives On the original thread gave different errors, initially "saving" forever, then attempting to use EDIT, it said that post was too old or had been deleted.

Interesting. There is something preventing me to post some comment. The disk is anyway MBR, isn't it? (or you have some mod to access GPT in Vista?) Or installing the Windows 10 first allows to install Vista on GPT? (i seem to remember there were issues in attempting to install Vista "directly" on GPT). in older XP, setting a BAUDRATE automatically switches DEBUG on: http://smallvoid.com/article/winnt-boot-ini.html it is probable that also expliciting DEBUGPORT has the same effect of enabling DEBUG automaticallly. Cannot say if it applies to the bootmgr version you are using, but have you tried the LOCAL option? jaclaz

I really don't know what is "hip" (or actually any good) these days, in the good ol'days I would have suggested ping: https://ping.windowsdream.com/ but they want the user to register now, and I am not going to do that. There is (free for non-commercial use) the Paragon software: https://www.paragon-software.com/free/br-free/# but it is windows 7 and up only and I don't seem to remember having ever had it working from a PE (which is how these backup/imaging system should run, offline). Something that would be worth a try is redo rescue: http://redorescue.com/ though I have no real experience with it, I have heard good things about it, though the sheer fact that it advices Balena Etcher[1] to make the USB version, it is NOT a good sign IMHO. jaclaz [1] Balena must be connected to the size of the stupid tool, more than 100 MB for what amounts to a fancy looking dd.

Only for the record, Recuva is a software that essentially undeletes files, it won't fix anyhting if the issues are at filesystem or partitioning level, but here the vhd(x) files are seemingly just fine, and the files are as well all here where they should be, this kind of failure is much more likely connected with the restore process, that finds *something* it doesn't like and freaks out, possibly a teeny-tiny setting in the Registry, the BCD, even in the (same) BIOS or *whatever* (there are reports of similar issues that seemingly were due to some "pending update" at the time of the creation of the image) that prevents from booting the restored system. Dave-H report is typical for something that only sometimes fails (or only sometimes works, if you are a pessimist) the kind of errors that are very difficult to pinpoint and hopefully solve. In typical MS approach, instead of looking for the issues, finding and fixing them, they decided to advise to not use the system backup and restore. You go to your car dealer and tell them that your car hand brake doesn't brake properly, i.e. fails to keep the car blocked when parked on a steep road and they tell you that you should buy a third party rope and anchor jaclaz

Maybe one was a "complete" system image and the other was only the C:? I am not at all familiar with what the (stupid) Windows 10 actually saves, but vhd and vhdx are normally a "whole disk" image, though it is entirely possible that there is a setting to only image the partition where the OS is, cannot say. Anyway if you can mount/access it you should be able to see what is inside those images. jaclaz

As said, if they are vhd(x) you can check them, I don't think it is the container (be it the 2 or 3 TB disk or the vhd), but rather the contents, but of course everything is possible. Anyway, glad that you managed to mostly solve the problem . jaclaz

Which reminds me of the good ol' times: https://boakandbailey.com/2014/04/six-pints-for-less-than-a-fiver-1978/ jaclaz

Is it a system image (i.e. a .vhd or .vhdx file)? If yes it can be normally mounted in the plain (10) OS, like any other vhd(x) disk image: https://www.techrepublic.com/article/how-to-access-a-system-image-and-restore-individual-files-using-windows-10s-native-vhd-support/ jaclaz

No idea, it works from here (Basilisk/Serpent) up to the basket (Warenkorb) and up to the page where you have to give your data/register. There is however a page Versandkosten: https://www.brainzap.de/versandkosten#versandkosten but there are only tariffs for Germany and EU, our friends on the other side of the Mare Britannicum seem to have not been considered. Dave however may look for one on local online shops or on e-bay UK, as an example here is one allegedly shipping from Wisbech, United Kingdom: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/155420573507 jaclaz

Well, I am notoriously cheap (besides old and grumpy) but I find that a a "high end" simple cable (shielded) costing 80-100 Euro (like the Thermaltake one) is "pure folly". Risking a few Euros for an el-cheapo one could be a fun experiment, if it doesn't work you have overpaid a short USB 3.0 cable ...

The "high quality" ones cost one arm and a leg, though. I have seen also some "riser" (that is the term to use in search) cards that (mis-)use a USB cable. They are used (generally) for mining rigs, cannot say if they can be used in this specific scenario, the original idea is being able to use several graphic cards/GPU's, search for "Riser Ver009S", or "riser ver010S" example: https://www.brainzap.de/crypto-mining-equipment/mining-equipment/pci-express-riser-adapter/brainzap-pci-express-riser-ver010s-plus-mining-karte-adapter-x1-auf-x16-usb-3-0-mining-v010s-10240 Here is a comparison between various types: https://videocardz.com/review/pci-express-riser-extender-test They are slower, but eliminate the problem with power lines as they are powered separately. DeLock (to name an usually reliable brand) has many different models on its catalogue: https://www.delock.com/produkte/G_1176_Riser-card.html jaclaz

And are you going to share a link to the actual driver or at least to the specific Reddit post ? jaclaz

If you are completely new about programming, and if it is for 9x I would advice you look into Delphi (basically what everyone else does NOT use). There are lots of (old, which in this case means good) books and manuals for the language that you can find used/second hand and - once you become familiar with it - you can still use your acquired knowledge using Lazarus (which is open source but only early version of it are Windows 9x/Me compatible) on newer OSes. I am not a programmer (at the most I can manage to half-@§§edly put together some scripts) and C and its variants (which are the alternative) are (to me at least) completely incomprehensible, Delphi is usually at least readable. For simple programs it is probably not worth the effort and I would go for some simpler environments, such as Autoit, up to 3.2.something it was windows 95 compatible. jaclaz