pallavsuri

hi guys ms released a new build of vista sp2 on 30th but its nowhere on the net. build number is 16497. installation is the same way. the same reg key tweak works. i also got the chance of installing windows 7 and had a few program compatibilty issues otherwise it had a lot of new customisation settings which is impressive. for now vista sp2 (16497) is performing a bit better than windows 7 on my machine.

thats true since both r new im wondering if sp2 and win 7 share the same underlying architecture and hence performance?

sure thing but there are many informed people around here. i'm sure its not entirely not of their interest either.

Hi now that both are with testers is there any performance comparison between the two? e.g. boot time, install time, app launch times, so on? couldn't find anything on google for this!

ah yes sf42 that link solved the problem finally

@etso still no go... maybe it has somethin to do with business edition? it doesnt like bus ed? :S

could be the virus scanner. try switching it off

ok tried with a fresh non vlite install the situation is the same. despite the registry update for sp2 windows update is showing that its upto date. ps: ive downloaded he 504 mb psf file and the installer for sp2 but no luck. anyone know what to do with these **** psf files??

ok~! ill try a non vlite vista and see how it goes.

same probem here but i dont think its a vlite issue

great work nuhi

i too have the same setup - integrated sp3 image and use no cd (i use manual installation option within the nlited xpsp3 real installation) to install from one partition to another( i dont use daemon tools or ms virtual cd or any iso.... i just run the setup from the folder which nlite modifies). i face same problems.... start menu shortcuts are missing e.g. no wmp no ie no calc on the start menu, drivers are not integrated properly, unattend file doesnt work so on... also when i run manual setup with an answer file then why do i need to enter cd key etc? i hope there is a solution to this soon!! i hope nuhi is reading this !!

haha there is no paranoia my friend nuhi... the product version shot is attached for your kind perusal as well good job with nlite/vlite despite the good intentions supporting 5503 is supporting piracy dear friend (no insults intended) catch you later

@nuhi my exact point why should anyone bother with "crafty Chinese and Russians resigned the changed SP3 which is actually a virus in some wonder land?" nothing personal or not even trying to insult anyone here but providing official support for pirated releases is supporting what?

1200? i guess u can count that on your fingers... (attachment last column)

argument of being bored holds little water. there are sufficient commercial reasons to do that - bored or not. jumping the gun without any official confirmation is pretty strange - releasing 1.4.5 b2 is supporting piracy imho.

well 3311 to 5503 for starters is a pretty big jump especially since there is nothing different compared to 3311 on the face of it. how difficult is it to hack/change build numbers anyway. insert some malware in 3311, bump up the build number and re-release it. who knows? the only reason for it to be legit is the new integration method needed. btw, offtopic sysinfo and ipconfig commands no longer work in command prompt... what component is responsible? thanks

nuhi could you confirm if this is a legit build and not hacked one? the technet forum link is pretty inconclusive. thanks

congrats for the timely release. good work!!

stick with xp/2003

what are the highlights of the coming release.?

i had this sorted out by enabling UAC and then running the HP application for PSC2600 series

Can Vista Integrator 9.1.1 slipstream the latest SP1 leak?

sometimes uac is the culprit and not the removals. enable/disable it.

yes this is irritating. nuhi kindly make this an option in the next version of vlite. thanks