I ask everyone to read the release notes carefully. I only help solve certain problems, and I created wrappers for DWrite to get it working on XP. All this hard work is thanks to e3k.
Personally, I think his browser is better than Supermium in every way. Especially after restoring WebGL acceleration support for D3D9 on XP and porting DWriteCore from the Win Apps SDK for XP (though users have reported that the browser doesn't work with it under certain conditions - I need to look into that). I also think it’s simply much faster - both on relatively good hardware and on low-end hardware, and it works with processors that only support SSE2.
https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Chromium-for-windows-7-REWORK/issues/65#issuecomment-4357771559
I won't repeat myself, because e3k's post on this issue covers everything there is to know about the differences between Supermium and Chromium for Windows 7.
The x64 version still has a problem with excessive virtual memory usage on XP x64, but fixing it would be pointless, it would take weeks or months of work to restore the behavior of the disabled GigaCage to the code, which was removed between versions 91 and 92, and in the meantime, Chromium has undergone two major changes to its memory allocator.
Supermium, on the other hand, is clearly very low on the author’s list of priorities, after all, he also develops an extended kernel available behind a paywall, so it’s clear which option is more profitable.