Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/20/2025 in all areas

  1. Fellows, Recently the copy dialogue stopped showing the white text in the description: I'm not sure if I'm the only one, but I began to get this situation recently. This is my version of Windows: Also, I'm wondering, will this dialogue support the Dark Mode one day? Thanks.
    1 point
  2. I only enabled the one custom theme. I will put making a new theme onto my worklog. Probably won't get to it until Monday at the earliest. If you have a wish about what kind of colors you are looking for, post in the Complaint Department.
    1 point
  3. New build of post-deprecated Serpent/moebius for XP! * Notice: This repo will not be built on regular schedule, and changes are experimental as usual. ** Current moebius patch level should be on par with 52.9, but some security patches can not be applied/ported due to source milestone differences between versions. Test binary: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win32-git-20250719-3577496e0-xpmod.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win64-git-20250719-3577496e0-xpmod.7z repo: https://github.com/roytam1/basilisk55 Repo changes: - import from UXP: Issue #2499 - Part 1: Add overflow: clip support and tests (ad396c6c) (70c17fd4f) - import from UXP: Issue #2499 - Part 2: Fix overflow shorthand serialization for mixed clip values (205ea844) (ec17993dc) - import from UXP: Issue #2499 - Part 3: Add CSS clip overflow support with serialization fixes (5e8e1208) (68ce5c95d) - import from UXP: Issue #2720 - Follow-up: Use temp value for duplicate color stop (07cf2e64) (df0626865) - import from UXP: Issue #2736 - Follow-up: Stop using worker thread-only functions for checking if CSP is enabled (c8608ad5) (c9ee7fc5a) - import from UXP: Issue #2792 -Implements parsing, computed style, and writing mode mapping for overflow-block and overflow-inline properties (0903daca) (7194d6223) - import from UXP: Issue #2691: Implement ParseSupportsSelector (squashed) (3577496e0)
    1 point
  4. No problems here in Thorium. I have just logged into my Google account and Google Drive opens fine here. No crashes to observe. All seems to be normal. And it runs surprisingly quite fast on my old machine.
    1 point
  5. What are you hardware specs? And which version of Thorium and the Chrome XP API Adapter do you use?
    1 point
  6. Which version of the Chrome XP API Adapter do you use for Thorium? The most recent one is 1.2.0.5057.
    1 point
  7. My Thorium installation and configuration is very stable under Windows XP. I use the SSE2 edition which seems to be suitable to my Pentium 4 CPU with SSE2 instruction set at maximum. No browser or tab crashes, no problems with my USB hard disk which is currently connected. At the moment, I am writing this comment from Thorium on my XP machine.
    1 point
  8. @chermany4ever You can't configure much in Thorium's Settings to improve its performance and running behaviour under Windows XP. What I actually meant was to change other things like updating the Chrome XP API Adapter, disabling animations and media autoplay, using a mobile user agent, setting suitable internal and external flags and so on. I did that, and now, this browser is running much better than before. PS: Also very important is a well-configured content blocker. Yesterday, I had to buy some articles on Amazon. Among other browsers, I also tested this website in Thorium. If uBlock Origin is not well-configured, the Amazon website does not load that fluently as it should. At the moment, I use uBlock Origin Lite as it consumes far fewer resources in Thorium and seems to be better suited to this browser.
    1 point
  9. My Thorium browser needs round about 260 MB for one opened tab and eleven enabled extensions. In my opinion, that's really low for a modern Chrome browser running under Windows XP. And don't forget my hardware is very old and weak, Pentium 4 single-core CPU and only 1.5 GB SD-RAM! Here is a screenshot: Personally, I can't confirm that this browser is unstable. Thorium never crashed here and is very stable. And the page loading behaviour is much better than at the beginning of my test phase.
    1 point
  10. Your comment is again offtopic. Read carefully what I have written here: No further discussions about 360Chrome issues in this thread. Post your 360Chrome issues in one of the corresponding Arctifoxie threads! A solution has been provided for you here in detail. And that means use ProxHTTPSProxy! And thus, we are finally on-topic again!
    1 point
  11. Regarding running Supermium under Windows XP on old, weak hardware, I definitely have to agree. This browser does not work properly there. On the other hand, Thorium does, though. But you have to exactly configure it suitable for your hardware. But TBH, my main browsers under Windows XP still remain New Moon 28 and Serpent.
    1 point
  12. Congratulations on your first browser compilation!
    1 point
  13. As far as I have tested until now, the Chromium Web Store extension works really great in Thorium. It indeed allows adding extensions from Chrome Web Store on ungoogled Chromium versions and also enables the extension updating by dragging and dropping. Now, I always get an extension update notification on the Chromium Web Store badge when extension updates are available and can immediately archive the downloaded update files.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...