hougtimo Posted June 19, 2007 Posted June 19, 2007 Hi,I have been commissioned to create a website for my Church. You can see the old site at : HereThe site I have been working on is currently hosted Here and will eventually be transferred to the "proper" church domain.I am looking for opinions on the design of the site and the information contained within it. Any suggestions are welcome, as well as constructive critismThanksHougTimo
IcemanND Posted June 19, 2007 Posted June 19, 2007 Looks nice, much better than the original.Two things I noticed, the scrolling marquee on the home page either need to be longer, or needs to continuously scroll rather then reset to the beginning when the end is reached. And the slideshow brought up a missing link, this may have been due to the site being worked on but I thought I would mention it.
tain Posted June 19, 2007 Posted June 19, 2007 Great work! Simple, classic and understated. Perfect for a church site.
hougtimo Posted June 19, 2007 Author Posted June 19, 2007 Looks nice, much better than the original.Two things I noticed, the scrolling marquee on the home page either need to be longer, or needs to continuously scroll rather then reset to the beginning when the end is reached. And the slideshow brought up a missing link, this may have been due to the site being worked on but I thought I would mention it.Yeah, can you let me know what browser you are using? I know there is an issue with the scrooling marquee in Firefox which I am not sure how to fix ... (anyone have any ideas?)Also I know about the link. We're currently re-writing the slideshow in Movie Maker, so it should be up soon. Maybe I should point that out on the site.Thanks very much for all your comments Tim
IcemanND Posted June 19, 2007 Posted June 19, 2007 FF 2.0.0.4.Just llok at it in IE6, works much better there.
mau-yong Posted June 19, 2007 Posted June 19, 2007 The newer version looks much better than the original !The thing that caught my eye however, is the line Holy Trinity Church is not responsible for the content of external websites on the Online Media Page. In my humble opinion, this is like telling me not to go to these sites, and a little more painful to the eyes. Try to consider to understate it a little bit, or since your background color is white, use a little more grey color or something less than black or #000000 - #C0C0C0 would be nice.
hougtimo Posted June 20, 2007 Author Posted June 20, 2007 The newer version looks much better than the original !The thing that caught my eye however, is the line Holy Trinity Church is not responsible for the content of external websites on the Online Media Page. In my humble opinion, this is like telling me not to go to these sites, and a little more painful to the eyes. Try to consider to understate it a little bit, or since your background color is white, use a little more grey color or something less than black or #000000 - #C0C0C0 would be nice.Thanks for that I will certainly look into changing that thanks for your input!HougTimo
Idontwantspam Posted June 20, 2007 Posted June 20, 2007 My goodness! 56 errors! VALIDATE!!OK then. Other than that, it looks pretty good, though I agree about having the marquee go all the way.
tain Posted June 20, 2007 Posted June 20, 2007 haha, looks like he will need to get use to CSS.I see more (X)HTML errors than CSS errors.
ripken204 Posted June 20, 2007 Posted June 20, 2007 well its both of them. to validate you cant use all of those attributes inside of the tags.
TomcaT Posted June 21, 2007 Posted June 21, 2007 (edited) The site has a nice look and feel to it, the only things I would change about the layout, is the main content area creates another set of scroll bars, even on my 19 inch monitor the main browser pages scrolls (1280 x1024), I feel having 2 sets of scrollbars is unneccessary as the user has to scroll anyway with the amount of content, so I would change the class .overflow in your CSS to this:.overflow{ width: 825px; height: 619px; }Also the validation from W3C is worth doing.Other than that you should be proud of your design. Edit... woke up this morning and thought you could get rid the overflow class completely and take the corresponding <div></div> tags out the html pages. Edited June 21, 2007 by TomcaT
hougtimo Posted June 21, 2007 Author Posted June 21, 2007 haha, looks like he will need to get use to CSS.Sorry but I'm new to web design, so instead of slide comments, how about how i can go about fixing them?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now